On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:18:30 -0600 jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 14.04.2015 22:51, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> > There are enough Fedora's kernels for narrow down the search, prior to
> > bisect.
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/kernel
> >
> >
> >
>
> I booted 3.18.5-101.fc20.x86_64
>
> and
On 04/16/2015 12:58 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 09:32 -0600, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
If you believe that chrome-sandbox should be allowed write access on
the oom_score_adj file by default.
Then you should report this as a bug.
Did you?
My thoughts exactly. Putting
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 09:32 -0600, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> If you believe that chrome-sandbox should be allowed write access on
> the oom_score_adj file by default.
> Then you should report this as a bug.
Did you?
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or chan
On 14.04.2015 22:51, Heinz Diehl wrote:
There are enough Fedora's kernels for narrow down the search, prior to bisect.
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/kernel
I booted 3.18.5-101.fc20.x86_64
and hibernation still does not work.
But when I was still running f20, it was working
SELinux is preventing chrome-sandbox from write access on the file
oom_score_adj.
* Plugin chrome (98.5 confidence) suggests
If you want to use the plugin package
Then you must turn off SELinux controls on the Chrome plugins.
Do
# setsebool -P unconfined_chrome_
On 04/16/2015 07:19 AM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
I'm looking for Fedora 20 dkim-milter package (which was in F19 and
lower), but it seems as it isn't available - probably not even in
the F21). Know anyone?
It was retired. You should switch to opendkim.
Where can I see the fate of the packages
I'm looking for Fedora 20 dkim-milter package (which was in F19 and
lower), but it seems as it isn't available - probably not even in
the F21). Know anyone?
Where can I see the fate of the packages that were formerly and now
are not it (e.g. LTSP and others) ?
--
TIA, Franta Hanzlik
--
users mai
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 21:18:07 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> It appears that i may have accidentally (and completely) messed up my spec
> file. Without the original spec file, the problem is no longer reproducible.
> Though the two rpms were successfully created and had the oddity with the
> spec
