On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
> Unless you have the drive under raid that means that 15 sectors cannot
> be read and you have lost at least some data.
>
> The drives normally will not move sectors that it cannot successfully read.
>
> You may be able to copy the data off the
Unless you have the drive under raid that means that 15 sectors cannot
be read and you have lost at least some data.
The drives normally will not move sectors that it cannot successfully read.
You may be able to copy the data off the disk, but you may when trying
this find a lot more bad sectors
On 03/12/2015 09:12 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 03/12/2015 05:57 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 03/12/2015 05:16 PM, Jim Lewis wrote:
I have been puzzling through some old posts here on skype. I need it
working for a conference call monday morning.
Subject: No sound in Skype on Fedora 64-b
On 03/12/2015 05:57 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 03/12/2015 05:16 PM, Jim Lewis wrote:
I have been puzzling through some old posts here on skype. I need it
working for a conference call monday morning.
Subject: No sound in Skype on Fedora 64-bit
Seems to be talking about installing lpf-sk
On 03/12/2015 05:16 PM, Jim Lewis wrote:
I have been puzzling through some old posts here on skype. I need it
working for a conference call monday morning.
Subject: No sound in Skype on Fedora 64-bit
Seems to be talking about installing lpf-skype even on an x86_64 system
and it basically wor
Ever since a couple of updates ago, evolution will be stucking in
"filtering mode", as in waiting for all the emails to be filtered and
sent to their respective folders. I have to close, then kill the pid.
Then I can reopen it and it will start filtering with no problems. But
once you leave it op
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Anyway, seeing as this happens on an fsck, that means filesystem
> metadata is affected and if e2fsck -f doesn't fix it then, the fs is
> toast. I honestly would just immediately remount it ro, and back it up
> though before forcing an fsck.
On 12.03.2015, stan wrote:
> So, cgroups seem like another dead end.
It depends on the machine used and the amount of processes.
While cgroups limit more than just CPU power, you could
try with BFS (which does not use cgroups).
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/bfs/3.0/3.19/
--
users mailing list
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:37 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 03/12/2015 03:28 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> smarctl -l scterc /dev/sdb
>
> # smartctl -l scterc /dev/sdb
> smartctl 6.2 2014-07-16 r3952 [x86_64-linux-3.18.8-201.fc21.x86_64] (local
> build)
> Copyright (C) 2002-13, Bruce Allen, Christian
On 03/12/2015 03:33 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 03/12/2015 04:03 PM, jd1008 wrote:
--
On 03/12/2015 01:37 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
smartctl --all /dev/sd
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAGVALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED
WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 20
On 03/12/2015 03:28 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
smarctl -l scterc /dev/sdb
# smartctl -l scterc /dev/sdb
smartctl 6.2 2014-07-16 r3952 [x86_64-linux-3.18.8-201.fc21.x86_64]
(local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-13, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org
SCT Error Recovery Control comm
On 03/12/2015 04:03 PM, jd1008 wrote:
--
On 03/12/2015 01:37 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
smartctl --all /dev/sd
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAGVALUE WORST THRESH TYPEUPDATED
WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail
Always - 0
196 Re
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:21:06 +0100
poma wrote:
> The Devil is in the detail.
>
> Both:
> 1. diff
> -u /boot/config-3.18.8-201.fc21.x86_64
> /boot/config-3.19.0-1.20150211.fc21.x86_64
> 2. dmidecode (as root)
>
> to http://fpaste.org s'il vous plaît.
>
>
You seem to be the last hope for a s
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> What do you get for:
> smarctl -l scterc /dev/sdb
smartctl -l scterc /dev/sdb
Helps to not have typos, and this command likes that additional t.
--
Chris Murphy
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:36:43 +
Ian Malone wrote:
> Since I can't reproduce this problem I'm not sure what's causing it.
> If you really are finding make subprocesses limited to 100% cpu across
> the lot then maybe have a look to see if there are any cgroups limits
> active
> https://access.re
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:20 PM, jd1008 wrote:
> [ 117.660065] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb]
> [ 117.660703] Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error - auto reallocate failed
What is sdb used for? Single drive or is it in some kind of raid?
This is a URE with failed reallocation which means the data and
checks
On 03/12/2015 01:42 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have been puzzling through some old posts here on skype. I need it
working for a conference call monday morning.
Subject: No sound in Skype on Fedora 64-bit
Seems to be talking about installing lpf-skype even on an x86_64 system
and it basicall
> I have been puzzling through some old posts here on skype. I need it
> working for a conference call monday morning.
>
> Subject: No sound in Skype on Fedora 64-bit
>
> Seems to be talking about installing lpf-skype even on an x86_64 system
> and it basically works? Some sound problems but wor
On 03/12/2015 01:52 PM, jd1008 wrote:
But... but now I have to back up what I can
and send it in for warranty.
True, but isn't that better than not having the warranty at all? And,
with some of the diagnostics others have suggested, you might not need
to send it back at all. Still, if you d
--
On 03/12/2015 01:37 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
smartctl --all /dev/sd
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAGVALUE WORST THRESH TYPEUPDATED
WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail
Always - 0
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200
On 03/12/2015 01:54 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote:
On 03/12/2015 03:40 PM, stan wrote:
Are you sure you don't want to know what I had for breakfast today? :-D
No! That's what Facebook is for! B^)
Article tagline from the Orange County Register this morning:
A study co-authored by a C
On 03/12/2015 03:40 PM, stan wrote:
> Are you sure you don't want to know what I had for breakfast today? :-D
No! That's what Facebook is for! B^)
--
Kevin J. Cummings
kjch...@verizon.net
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net
cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us
Registered Linux User #1232 (http://www.lin
But... but now I have to back up what I can
and send it in for warranty.
My point was more about how could I run out of spare
sectors when I have had no prior reports of hard sector
errors prior to this fsck?
On 03/12/2015 01:29 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 03/12/2015 12:20 PM, jd1008 wrote:
So, I
I have been puzzling through some old posts here on skype. I need it
working for a conference call monday morning.
Subject: No sound in Skype on Fedora 64-bit
Seems to be talking about installing lpf-skype even on an x86_64 system
and it basically works? Some sound problems but work around t
On 12.03.2015, stan wrote:
> When I build firefox nightly with -j6, just at the end of the export
> phase, and before the compile starts, I see all 6 cores maxed out.
> Once the compile starts, it is back to a single core equivalent. The
> Gentoo users seemed to suggest that this was a flaw in t
Install the smartmon tools.
Run smartctl -a on the drive. It may tell you something. Has the disk ever been
dropped? Is the "on time" in smart too high compared to when you bought it
(have they sold you a second hand drive)?
Sendt fra min Sony Xperia™-smarttelefon
jd1008 skrev
>Hi al
Hi all, couldn't answer earlier, thanks for hooking on the thread.
@billo:
Yeah, my answer to most of these "how do I do this complex reconfiguration
Why should it be 'complex'? It's certainly complex here - or it's just me
as I'm not used to Fedora's way.
I've been using Arch & Gentoo for the la
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:21:06 +0100
poma wrote:
> Both:
> 1. diff
> -u /boot/config-3.18.8-201.fc21.x86_64
> /boot/config-3.19.0-1.20150211.fc21.x86_64
> 2. dmidecode (as root)
>
> to http://fpaste.org s'il vous plaît.
1 week
http://fpaste.org/197315/88936142/
The config is now for kernel-4
smartctl --all /dev/sdX and see how many are reallocated.
From my experience how many spare sectors there are depends on the
size and brand.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 03/12/2015 12:20 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>>
>> So, I am puzzled as to how quickly were the spare sectors c
On 03/12/2015 12:20 PM, jd1008 wrote:
So, I am puzzled as to how quickly were the spare sectors consumed so that
automatic sector forwarding ran out os spare sectors? So quickly on a
brand new drive??
This is what warranties are for.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
Hi all,
on a new drive, installed about 3 months ago ... fsck shows:
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
[ 117.650425] ata5.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0xc0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
[ 117.650678] ata5.00: irq_stat 0x4008
[ 117.650840] ata5.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED
[ 117.
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 18:01:07 -0400 (EDT)
ergodic wrote:
> Frankly I never check the loading, just use -j with no argument,
> but I always do other processes in parallel with no problem.
Then I think you must be having the same behavior as me. Because, as
Ian found, if a compile grabs all the cp
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:14:39 -0400
Kevin Cummings wrote:
> We're thinking in terms of one machine with multiple cores here. What
> about an environment with multiple machines (each possibly with
> multiple cores). Now you have *many* more possibilities of where to
> run compiles with -j. Consi
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 20:56:37 +0100
Heinz Diehl wrote:
> Haven't looked into this for some time, but take a look into
> /usr/src/linux/kernel/sched/fair.c.
> (The CFS code is complex and difficult to understand, though - at
> least for me).
Took a quick look at this. Only ~8000 lines of well doc
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:36:43 +
Ian Malone wrote:
> You may want to check the .NOTPARALLEL directive is not present
> http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Parallel though I
> think that would simply prevent multiple processes.
This sounded like exactly the problem, but when I che
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> If you go to:
> admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
> and type in kernel, you'll see kernel-3.18.9-200.fc21 is in "testing"
> which translates into
>
> # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing kernel-3.18.9-200.fc21'
>
> If that doesn't wo
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Meikel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> in bugzilla I found a bug
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197842) that adresses an issue
> I have. In a comment from Fedora Update System I can see that
> "kernel-3.18.9-200.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedo
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 04:22:00PM +0100, Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen
wrote:
> I am trying to build a rpm but now I got a perl problem ?
> It looks like my perl installation is somehow broken currently.
> Pleas advise.
> This is perl 5, version 18, subversion 4 (v5.18.4) built for
> x
On 03/12/2015 04:22 PM, Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build a rpm but now I got a perl problem ?
It looks like my perl installation is somehow broken currently.
$ perl --version
This is perl 5, version 18, subversion 4 (v5.18.4) built for
x86_64-linux-thre
> [root at frontserver ~]# systemctl is-enabled cups.path abrt-ccpp.service abrt-oops.service abrt-vmcore.service abrt-xorg.service abrtd.service accounts-daemon.service atd.service auditd.service avahi-daemon.service bluetooth.service chronyd.service crond.service cups.service dbus-org.
Hi,
I am trying to build a rpm but now I got a perl problem ?
It looks like my perl installation is somehow broken currently.
Pleas advise.
Thanks a lot.
Regards
Martin
$ perl --version
This is perl 5, version 18, subversion 4 (v5.18.4) built for
x86_64-linux-thread-multi
(with 23 regist
/dev/sda6 =-->is the new partition that I recently created with file
system type ext4
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Angelo Moreschini <
mrangelo.fed...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi David,
>
> I would like to know if the memory configuration must be done (this causes
> me confusion)
>
>- be
On 03/12/2015 03:51 PM, Meikel wrote:
Hi folks,
in bugzilla I found a bug
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197842) that adresses an
issue I have. In a comment from Fedora Update System I can see that
"kernel-3.18.9-200.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.".
Can som
hi David,
I would like to know if the memory configuration must be done (this causes
me confusion)
- before starting the installation process,
- or be made during the installation process
- or, finally, if it can be done in both cases
Are you preparing to install Fedora 21 ? Yes I am i
Hi folks,
in bugzilla I found a bug
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197842) that adresses an
issue I have. In a comment from Fedora Update System I can see that
"kernel-3.18.9-200.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.".
I would like to verify if that kernel fixes
On 12/03/15 21:22, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
...
> I do not see a chance to interact with the program to implement the
> required choices.
Are you preparing to install Fedora 21 ?
500 GB is way large enough, for example my current installation of the
system partitions is: df -h
Filesystem
I prefer to put OS on internal HD, I am custom to use external HDs only
for data
We should need to know very well also what is the environment of the
commercial products... [?]but this will be for the next time ...
Now I have problem with the memory configuration, doing the installation.
47 matches
Mail list logo
