Re: rpm option --import

On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:00:55 -0700, jd1008 wrote: > > "man rpmkeys" > > it's an alias for rpmkeys --import > > Thanx. It should still be documented in the rpm man page > because rpm accepts --import as a valid arg. Default aliases are a matter of configuration defaults that have been added out of

Re: Recovering a Crashed Fedora

On 29.01.2015, Mickey wrote: > But what I'm concerned about is that Root will change the owner of the Tar > files. after i do the new install it will have the same user on the crashed > drive. Never ever compress backup data which contains valuable data. One single bit flip will render your who

Re: Wireless can't ping wireless (SOLVED)

For those following this thread I solved the problem by getting a new router. Here's a quick recap: - I found I couldn't ping a wireless device from another wireless device. - I could not ping a wireless device from a wired device unless I pinged the wired device from the wireless device f

Re: Recovering a Crashed Fedora

On 01/28/2015 08:53 PM, Mickey wrote: I have a Fedora 15 hard drive that crashed and I want save the Users files. I have a Fedora 20 Live Cd on the computer and I can read the users home directory. I want to do a tar -cvf on the Users home directory and temporyly store it on my PC until I

Recovering a Crashed Fedora

I have a Fedora 15 hard drive that crashed and I want save the Users files. I have a Fedora 20 Live Cd on the computer and I can read the users home directory. I want to do a tar -cvf on the Users home directory and temporyly store it on my PC until I do a complete install of fedora 20 on th

Re: Anaconda illegal address

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 7:12 PM, CLOSE Dave wrote: > When anaconda complains about an "illegal IP address string passed to > inet_aton", how can I discover what the bad string contains? So far as I > can see, all the configured addresses are perfectly valid. Here's a copy > of the traceback:

Re: What is Ghost i.e security hole in the Linux?

On 01/28/2015 07:17 PM, Tim wrote: Allegedly, on or about 28 January 2015, Doug sent: ... A remote attacker able to call either of these functions could exploit the flaw to execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the user running the application All these security flaws come with th

Re: What is Ghost i.e security hole in the Linux?

Allegedly, on or about 28 January 2015, Doug sent: > ... A remote attacker able to call either of these functions could > exploit the flaw to execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the > user running the application All these security flaws come with the usual "flaw allows escalation o

Anaconda illegal address

When anaconda complains about an "illegal IP address string passed to inet_aton", how can I discover what the bad string contains? So far as I can see, all the configured addresses are perfectly valid. Here's a copy of the traceback: . -- Dave Close, Thales Avionics, Irvine

Re: rpm option --import

On 01/28/2015 02:40 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:29:50 -0700, jd1008 wrote: is not shown in the manpage nor is it displayed when running rpm --help Hope the devs lurking on this list see this and look into other undocumented options and document them in the man page. I

Re: rpm option --import

$ rpm -q rpm rpm-4.12.0.1-4.fc21.x86_64 On 01/28/2015 02:35 PM, Philip Keogh wrote: What is the output of: 'rpm --version' 'yum info rpm' and 'cat /etc/issue' ? On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:29 PM, jd1008 wrote: is not shown in the manpage nor is it displayed when running rpm --help Hope the dev

Re: CurrentPendingSector

Please provide the output from the parted command mentioned previously. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guideli

Re: CurrentPendingSector

Hello, Here is the log file: Complete error log: SMART Error Log Version: 1 ATA Error Count: 2 CR = Command Register [HEX] FR = Features Register [HEX] SC = Sector Count Register [HEX] SN = Sector Number Register [HEX] CL = Cylinder Low Register [HEX]

Re: CurrentPendingSector

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0022 100 100 000Old_age Always > - 1 Right. So just use smartctl -t long on the drive. In the next section you didn't paste in, it'll tell you the LBA for the bad sector and that's what

Re: CurrentPendingSector

=== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12

Re: CurrentPendingSector

On 01/28/2015 03:14 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote: On 01/28/2015 04:06 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, I get: Device: /dev/sdc [SAT], 1 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors How can I manage this issue? Buy a new disk drive? Seriously, pending sectors are disk write errors and the disk has run

Re: CurrentPendingSector

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > I get: > Device: /dev/sdc [SAT], 1 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors > > How can I manage this issue? > You can write over the affected sector, and if it's a genuinely bad sector (persistent write failure) the LBA will be ma

Re: Why does Anaconda overrides user decisions?

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 05:15:53AM -0600, Glenn Holmer wrote: >> > Anacoda is the weakest link in Fedora toolchain. The non-linear UI is >> > completely non-intuitive >> +1, the partitioner is the worst I've seen in 20 years of using Linux.

Re: CurrentPendingSector

On 28.01.2015, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Device: /dev/sdc [SAT], 1 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors First, you should backup the whole drive, if it contains important data. Then, you could do a "smartctl -t long /dev/sdc" and see if it completes without error. Most probably, you'll need a n

Re: rpm option --import

On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:29:50 -0700, jd1008 wrote: > is not shown in the manpage nor is it displayed when > running rpm --help > > Hope the devs lurking on this list see this > and look into other undocumented options and > document them in the man page. > > I gamble that there are many *nix* and

Re: rpm option --import

What is the output of: 'rpm --version' 'yum info rpm' and 'cat /etc/issue' ? On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:29 PM, jd1008 wrote: > is not shown in the manpage nor is it displayed when > running rpm --help > > Hope the devs lurking on this list see this > and look into other undocumented options and >

rpm option --import

is not shown in the manpage nor is it displayed when running rpm --help Hope the devs lurking on this list see this and look into other undocumented options and document them in the man page. I gamble that there are many *nix* and *nux* man pages and help menus that have this issue. -- users ma

Re: kded issue

Looks like this is realted to my issue, but updated packages are not yet available, so I'll just wait a few days: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180886 2015-01-28 17:45 GMT-03:00 Martín Marqués : > Hi all, > > I have a laptop with Fedora 20 (IIRC I had F19 and upgraded like 6 or 7

Re: CurrentPendingSector

On 01/28/2015 04:06 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > I get: > Device: /dev/sdc [SAT], 1 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors > > How can I manage this issue? Buy a new disk drive? Seriously, pending sectors are disk write errors and the disk has run out of "extra" blocks to write/re-map

CurrentPendingSector

Hello, I get: Device: /dev/sdc [SAT], 1 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors How can I manage this issue? Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie

Re: What is Ghost i.e security hole in the Linux?

On 01/28/2015 12:29 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Even though you fixed this yourself, F19 has already been EOLed and will therefore not receive even critical security updates such as this one. That's why it's important for people to stay current with the supported versions, or switch to a distr

kded issue

Hi all, I have a laptop with Fedora 20 (IIRC I had F19 and upgraded like 6 or 7 months ago to F20) and everything was working great til a few weeks ago. The problem is that every now and then, when I try to sent the laptop to sleep, by closing the top or pressing Fn+F4, it doesn't full finish the

Re: What is Ghost i.e security hole in the Linux?

On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 13:24 -0500, Kevin Cummings wrote: > On 01/28/2015 01:19 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 02:21:41PM +, Norah Jones wrote: > >> Can someone describe in detail about the Ghost security hole. And is > >> there any patch or a solution to fix it? > > > >

Re: WiFi - Atheros - miniPCIe

On 01/28/2015 09:09 AM, poma wrote: On 27.01.2015 21:42, Stephen Morris wrote: On 01/28/2015 03:17 AM, poma wrote: On 25.01.2015 13:46, poma wrote: On 25.01.2015 00:05, Stephen Morris wrote: ... pci adapter. The only problem I have now is that it is very hard to get devices that support Linux

Re: Suddenly can't get nameserver resolution on FC21 after ...

On 01/28/2015 07:02 AM, William W. Austin wrote: I have checked my ifcfg-* files under/etc/sysconfig/ (all 3 links of each of the 2 nics) and they are unchanged. My /etc/hosts file is unchanged DNS is configured in /etc/resolv.conf. Look there. Attempt to ping your DNS servers to verify they

Re: Net install of Fedora 21: use local "installation source"

On 01/27/2015 08:24 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote: Thank you very much for the reply. However I am asking about which URL I should place in the "installation source" field when installing a fresh copy of Fedora 21 server. this is when I am installing fedora before I have a proper file system. Use

Re: top command question

On 01/27/2015 05:51 PM, jd1008 wrote: Is there a version of top that will show per cpu loads? Press '1' on your keyboard to see per-CPU utilization in the standard 'top' application. Note that "load" is not a measure of CPU utilization. Load is simply the average number of processes in a n

Re: What is Ghost i.e security hole in the Linux?

On 01/28/2015 01:19 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 02:21:41PM +, Norah Jones wrote: >> Can someone describe in detail about the Ghost security hole. And is >> there any patch or a solution to fix it? > > This was a problem fixed in glibc 2.18, so that version, as shipped i

Re: What is Ghost i.e security hole in the Linux?

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 02:21:41PM +, Norah Jones wrote: > Can someone describe in detail about the Ghost security hole. And is > there any patch or a solution to fix it? This was a problem fixed in glibc 2.18, so that version, as shipped in F20, and 2.20, as we have in F21, are not vulnerable

Re: What is Ghost i.e security hole in the Linux?

On 01/28/2015 09:21 AM, Norah Jones wrote: Hi, Can someone describe in detail about the Ghost security hole. And is there any patch or a solution to fix it? Thanks, Norah Jones The following is repeated verbatim from the PCLinuxOS Forum: (Posted by jzakiya) glibc vulnerbility « on: Yest

Re: End of 32-bit support?

On 28.01.2015 17:17, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 08:37:59AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> Hatters, or from Red Hatters working in their spare time. (Of course, >>> as RH often does, many of the high-output contributors end up applying >>> for and getting RH jobs, skewing the

Re: Does anyone have fake flash drives?

On 28.01.2015 17:37, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 28 January 2015 at 16:30, poma wrote: >> (gnome-multi-writer-probe:11677): GnomeMultiWriter-DEBUG: Disk reports to be >> 14762MB in size >> Device is FAKE: Failed to verify data at 1248MB > > Do you still get this if you unmount the drive before ru

SMS VMG reader

Greetings, Is there a Linux-based RPM-distributed reader of VMG files. From what I can tell, SMS messages are stored in VMG files, a text file that is marked-up similarly to VCF files. Much thanks! Max Pyziur p...@brama.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Does anyone have fake flash drives?

On 28 January 2015 at 16:30, poma wrote: > (gnome-multi-writer-probe:11677): GnomeMultiWriter-DEBUG: Disk reports to be > 14762MB in size > Device is FAKE: Failed to verify data at 1248MB Do you still get this if you unmount the drive before running the test? We should probably do that anyway I

Re: Does anyone have fake flash drives?

On 28.01.2015 17:26, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 28 January 2015 at 16:05, poma wrote: >> # gnome-multi-writer-probe --verbose /dev/sde >> Failed to scan device: Failed to open /dev/sde > > Hmm, you're root -- do you have any SELinux messages? I'm basically > trying to do "open(block_dev, O_RDWR |

Re: Does anyone have fake flash drives?

# udisksctl info --block-device /dev/sde /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/block_devices/sde: org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Block: Configuration: [] CryptoBackingDevice:'/' Device: /dev/sde DeviceNumber: 2112 Drive:

Re: Does anyone have fake flash drives?

On 28 January 2015 at 16:05, poma wrote: > # gnome-multi-writer-probe --verbose /dev/sde > Failed to scan device: Failed to open /dev/sde Hmm, you're root -- do you have any SELinux messages? I'm basically trying to do "open(block_dev, O_RDWR | O_SYNC)" Richard -- users mailing list users@lists

Re: Why does Anaconda overrides user decisions?

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 05:15:53AM -0600, Glenn Holmer wrote: > > Anacoda is the weakest link in Fedora toolchain. The non-linear UI is > > completely non-intuitive > +1, the partitioner is the worst I've seen in 20 years of using Linux. It also covers more cases more simply than any other storage

Re: End of 32-bit support?

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 08:37:59AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >Hatters, or from Red Hatters working in their spare time. (Of course, > >as RH often does, many of the high-output contributors end up applying > >for and getting RH jobs, skewing the picture.) > Well, I am observing quite a few peo

Re: Does anyone have fake flash drives?

On 28.01.2015 16:48, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 28 January 2015 at 15:40, poma wrote: >> "my repo" is actually what? > > Fixed, thanks! It's actually pointing to > http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/fedora/21/x86_64/ > > Richard > # udisksctl info --block-device /dev/sde /org/freedeskt

Re: Does anyone have fake flash drives?

On 28.01.2015 15:50, Richard Hughes wrote: > Hi all, > > I've added some initial functionality to gnome-multi-writer yesterday > to detect fake flash drives. If anyone has any USB storage drives that > they know misreport their true capacity, or that they suspect might be > counterfeit, I'd apprec

Re: Does anyone have fake flash drives?

On 28 January 2015 at 15:40, poma wrote: > "my repo" is actually what? Fixed, thanks! It's actually pointing to http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/fedora/21/x86_64/ Richard -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fed

Re: Suddenly can't get nameserver resolution on FC21 after ...

On 28.01.2015 16:02, William W. Austin wrote: > ... I did have to system-config-network-gui to set the network parameters > correctly and for two days it ran fine. $ repoquery --whatprovides system-config-network-gui -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change

Re: Latest Java-openjdk upgrade [SOLVED?]

On 01/27/2015 12:55 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote: > On 01/27/2015 10:49 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 12:09 -0200, Fernando Lozano wrote: >>> I do heavy Java development and never had issues with OpenJDK on >>> Fedora. >>> And I have OpenJDK on RHEL at many production sites. S

Suddenly can't get nameserver resolution on FC21 after ...

I have a Linux workstation with 2 network cards - one to get to the internet (so that I can work remotely from my home office) and one for my local lan (other machines, printers, etc.) About a week ago I updated it from FC20 to FC21 and had absolutely no problems. Everything was working smoothl

Does anyone have fake flash drives?

Hi all, I've added some initial functionality to gnome-multi-writer yesterday to detect fake flash drives. If anyone has any USB storage drives that they know misreport their true capacity, or that they suspect might be counterfeit, I'd appreciate some testing of a new command line tool. See http

Re: What is Ghost i.e security hole in the Linux?

On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:21:41 + Norah Jones wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone describe in detail about the Ghost security hole. And is there > any patch or a solution to fix it? You should read https://community.qualys.com/blogs/laws-of-vulnerabilities/2015/01/27/the-ghost-vulnerability --Fra

What is Ghost i.e security hole in the Linux?

Hi, Can someone describe in detail about the Ghost security hole. And is there any patch or a solution to fix it? Thanks, Norah Jones -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedo

Re: Linux and Skype Video

Can you stop posting this at the top of your replies: > This message is probably spam > > Symbol: ONCE_RECEIVED(1.00) > > X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at mcbain0012 > X-Virus-Status: Clean The spam indication is obviously wrong, something declaring that it's not a vir

Re: No sound in Skype on Fedora 20 64-bit

On 28 January 2015 at 02:53, Jim Lewis wrote: > >> >> On 01/27/2015 06:37 PM, Jim Lewis wrote: >>> Okay, so I installed lpf-skype on Fedora 20 and also got the no sound >>> problem. When I tried to fix it by doing what I did on F21: >>> >>> yum -y install pulseaudio-libs.i686 alsa-plugins-pulse