Does not work for an unrecognized piece of hardware. Alas.
The good news is that although I thought I'd installed all updates, that
apparently was not the case. Hopefully that will resolve the version conflict
that I've discovered from the dmesg output.
On 08/20/2014 05:58:25 PM, Rick Stevens w
On 08/20/2014 04:04 PM, Geoffrey Leach issued this missive:
Here's how to get a MAC address. Assuming (as I do) you have Windows on the
same box, go there and start Windows. Then start wireless. Now go to the router
admin page on Fedora, asn look to see what's attached. Voila!
The bad news: up
Here's how to get a MAC address. Assuming (as I do) you have Windows on the
same box, go there and start Windows. Then start wireless. Now go to the router
admin page on Fedora, asn look to see what's attached. Voila!
The bad news: upgraded the definition for the connection. Still no luck.
How
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Joonas Lehtonen:
> That tells me that dnf parses the same repo files as dnf,
should read:
That tells me that dnf parses the same repo files as yum,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJT9RYNAAoJEG58zmw5nc+v0q8QAM/yXMvqu/gqn9lgjsCVx4C9
X+AhA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
since it has been suggested that I should file bug [1] (CA pinning for
mirrors.fedoraproject.org for yum) also against yum's successor dnf
[2], I'm wondering if sslcacert is also understood by dnf?
from the man page of dnf.conf:
"DNF by defau
Hmmm ... memo to self: always google first.
So, two things. The MAC address that I used was for the ethernet interface. ip
does not show wifi, nor does lspci. The module is loaded.
On 08/20/2014 02:02:48 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> The kernel info at the link is helpful in that it confirms that
The kernel info at the link is helpful in that it confirms that the 7260 is
supported. Your modprobe command is the key. With all of the permutations I
tried, that particular one never occurred :-) Of course, modprobe installed the
firmware with nary a complaint. With this, NetworkManager permit
On 08/20/2014 12:47 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
I'm setting up a laptop with Fedora 19 up-to-date. The wireless chip is an Intel
7260.HMW, and I've confirmed that it works (under windows). The chip was not recognized
by the install, so I did a yum install of iwl7260.firmware.noarch. That did not
On 08/20/2014 03:47 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> I'm setting up a laptop with Fedora 19 up-to-date. The wireless chip is an
> Intel 7260.HMW, and I've confirmed that it works (under windows). The chip
> was not recognized by the install, so I did a yum install of
> iwl7260.firmware.noarch. That d
I'm setting up a laptop with Fedora 19 up-to-date. The wireless chip is an
Intel 7260.HMW, and I've confirmed that it works (under windows). The chip was
not recognized by the install, so I did a yum install of
iwl7260.firmware.noarch. That did not install the module, and insmod refuses to
inst
On 8/20/2014 11:31 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:02:09 -0400
sean darcy wrote:
I've just installed F20 on on an Acer Asprire, A8-7100, R5 Kaveri
graphics.
startx runs, then exits the server.
My errors show /dev/dri/card0 no such file. Is this because the
kernel isn't loa
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:02:09 -0400
sean darcy wrote:
> I've just installed F20 on on an Acer Asprire, A8-7100, R5 Kaveri
> graphics.
>
> startx runs, then exits the server.
>
> My errors show /dev/dri/card0 no such file. Is this because the
> kernel isn't loading the radeon module?
>
> Xorg.0
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:28:46 +0100, "Patrick O'Callaghan"
wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 17:51 -0400, George Avrunin wrote:
> > I wrote to the digikam list about this a few days ago, but haven't
> > gotten any response, so I thought I'd check here before filing a bug.
>
> You might also consider
I've just installed F20 on on an Acer Asprire, A8-7100, R5 Kaveri graphics.
startx runs, then exits the server.
My errors show /dev/dri/card0 no such file. Is this because the kernel
isn't loading the radeon module?
Xorg.0.log shows the radeon driver loaded:
X.Org X Server 1.14.4
Release Da
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 17:51 -0400, George Avrunin wrote:
> I wrote to the digikam list about this a few days ago, but haven't
> gotten any response, so I thought I'd check here before filing a bug.
You might also consider the Fedora-KDE list, which would have a higher
density of Digikam expertise
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 19:18 -0400, Vinny Onelli wrote:
> A couple time I was able to print after going through the printer setup
> and re-installing the printer on computer, but only last for one or two
> print.
You could try using the printing troubleshooter:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to
16 matches
Mail list logo