Re: Have you registered for Flock?

On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 00:03:41 -0400 Doug wrote: > > On 07/18/2014 12:06 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:05:35AM +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Paul W. Frields > >> wrote: > >> > >> > I don't know, and don't want to know what Floc

Re: Have you registered for Flock?

On 07/18/2014 12:06 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:05:35AM +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: I don't know, and don't want to know what Flock is and I don't want to register for it. Please UNSUBSCRIBE me! -- user

Re: wanted: performance laptop, no windoze tax

On 07/17/2014 02:41 PM, poma wrote: <<>> Absolutely all the recommended machines are flagrantly overpriced. Come back down to earth. "flagrantly overpriced" is flagrantly understated. -- peace out. in a world with out fences, who needs gates. tc.hago. g . -- users mailing list users@l

Re: wanted: performance laptop, no windoze tax

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Lists wrote: > I buy laptop with Windows, then buy a second SSD for Linux. When I want to > play a game or take advantage of support, I use the Windows drive. When I > want to get work done, I swap and use the Linux HDD. Just make sure the > laptop has an externall

Re: hbk file

On 07/18/2014 08:31 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote: On 18.07.2014, Kostas Sfakiotakis wrote: > >> Best result i have had so far was to upload the hbk back to my cell >> phone and then back it up with another application that would >> export the data i wanted in another format > > This one's free, witho

Re: Have you registered for Flock?

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:05:35AM +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Paul W. Frields > > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 08:48:06PM +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 201

Re: Is this proof that systemd is completely broken?

On 14/07/14 01:23, Tom Horsley wrote: On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 19:18:35 +0200 Timothy Murphy wrote: I'm afraid it does not reassure me at all when Dan Williams says he will be "granting every wish you dream of". Yea, and my wish and dream is that NetworkManager goes away, and network simply gets b

Re: Have you registered for Flock?

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:05:35AM +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Paul W. Frields > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 08:48:06PM +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Harald Hoyer > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On 17.07.2014

Re: ping now impossible?

On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 20:56:53 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote: > I'm running F20, of course, and I didn't even see a new iputils in > updates-testing. You're right. I misread the date on the rpm -i output. I have no idea where the capabilities went, but they are back now :-). -- users mailing list users@

Re: ping now impossible?

On 07/18/14 20:47, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:42:11 +0200 > Harald Hoyer wrote: > >> $ getcap /usr/bin/ping >> /usr/bin/ping = cap_net_admin,cap_net_raw+ep > Yep. If I use setcap to put those back on /usr/bin/ping > it starts working again. > > Did the iputils update today remove t

Re: ping now impossible?

On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:42:11 +0200 Harald Hoyer wrote: > $ getcap /usr/bin/ping > /usr/bin/ping = cap_net_admin,cap_net_raw+ep Yep. If I use setcap to put those back on /usr/bin/ping it starts working again. Did the iputils update today remove them somehow I wonder? -- users mailing list users@

Re: ping now impossible?

On 18.07.2014 14:22, Tom Horsley wrote: > Yesterday, I could run ping. This morning I installed updates > which came with a new kernel, and all attempts to ping > generate this: > > tomh> ping marmot > ping: icmp open socket: Operation not permitted > > I now have to use sudo in front of ping to

ping now impossible?

Yesterday, I could run ping. This morning I installed updates which came with a new kernel, and all attempts to ping generate this: tomh> ping marmot ping: icmp open socket: Operation not permitted I now have to use sudo in front of ping to make it work. What the heck happened with this round of

Re: Asus Transformer

On 07/17/2014 10:15 PM, Robin Laing wrote: On 2014-07-17 20:44, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I just saw a colleagues Asus Transformer. Has anyone got one and put Fedora on it? What model(s)? And any other answers I did not think to question :) I have used two different ASUS computers with Lin

Re: dhcpd and systemd

On 17/07/14 20:34, Sam Varshavchik wrote: how systemd chooses, more or less, at random, the order in which to fork off services it thinks should be started at the same time; in combination with the time it takes each individual service to start. That's the hardest thing I find to get my head a

Re: dhcpd and systemd

On 17/07/14 20:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote: boot, it doesn't respond to clients resolution requests until I manually restart the service after boot. I'll look a bit deeper into that one too and consider a bug report. I already reported the bind problem yesterday: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh

Re: openconnect (2 issues)

On 18.07.2014 04:03, Ranjan Maitra wrote: Hi, I have been using the openconnect option to Cisco's Anyconnect VPN, but have noticed two shortcomings. 1. When I lose connection for whatever reason, I have to manually restart the anyconnect plugin everytime. Is there a possibility to have it recon

RE: Taking the BTRFS plunge

FYI, i'm using BTRFS for over a year, Even though it is not a fedora machine, the upstream code remains the same I guess. I don't use advanced features of btrfs, (I stil use lvm on top of softraid) but it has proven for me (in this order) - reliable enough (never data loss, even after power incid