Re: uefi: What if ...?

On May 26, 2014, at 4:09 PM, lee wrote: > Hi, > > what if I got a new mainboard which uses uefi --- and might not even > support disabling or not using uefi --- and wanted to boot? > > Booting is from a HP smart array P800. Would that work? Would I need > to do something to get it to work, a

grub problem while trying to configure kdump on F20

I I think grub isn't seeing my updated changes when I'm setting up kdump on F-20. First I installed the the packages /kexec-tools/, /crash/, and /kernel-debuginfo/. Next I added crashkernel=128M to /GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX/ the in //etc/default/grub/. Then I rebuild the grub config with: grub

uefi: What if ...?

Hi, what if I got a new mainboard which uses uefi --- and might not even support disabling or not using uefi --- and wanted to boot? Booting is from a HP smart array P800. Would that work? Would I need to do something to get it to work, and if so, what? -- Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug) -- u

Re: [OT] Chrome Notice (Warning)

On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 19:17 +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote: > Then why do we have two options, erase and remove, if they are same? IIRC because it was originally called erase and then changed to remove, but the old name was kept for backwards compatibility. Or maybe it was the other way round. Updat

Re: [OT] Chrome Notice (Warning)

2014-05-26 15:47, Sudhir Khanger skrev: > > On 26-May-2014 5:44 pm, "Patrick O'Callaghan" > wrote: >> >> On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 17:21 +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote: >> > I like the idea of "remove" which removes just the package and "erase" >> > which erases everything

Re: broken dependency in F20 updates

Andre Robatino wrote: > I've seen this both with the previous updates push and the latest one. > AFAIK there is no bug report. Which component should it be reported under? > > [root@compaq-pc ~]# yum --skip-broken update > Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit > updates/20/x86_64/metalink

Re: [OT] Chrome Notice (Warning)

On 26-May-2014 5:44 pm, "Patrick O'Callaghan" wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 17:21 +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote: > > I like the idea of "remove" which removes just the package and "erase" > > which erases everything automatically-created-and-hidden-by-system. > > From time to time software start

Re: [OT] Chrome Notice (Warning)

On 05/26/14 19:51, Sudhir Khanger wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> >> You are confusing things, IMHO, we are not talking about the "prerogative" >> of a system admin but how things are/should work. >> >> You seem to be suggesting that >> >> yum erase google-chrom

Re: printer

On 05/26/14 18:28, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Thank, I installed the plugin and run it but, again after a reboot, I have > to reinstall the printer from hp-setup! I think it is time you file the bugzilla and provide the information requested by Tim Waugh. When you do, please post the bugzilla id her

Re: [OT] Chrome Notice (Warning)

On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 17:21 +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote: > I like the idea of "remove" which removes just the package and "erase" > which erases everything automatically-created-and-hidden-by-system. > From time to time software start misbehaving or an update that brings > huge changes and it won't

Re: [OT] Chrome Notice (Warning)

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/26/14 17:01, Sudhir Khanger wrote: >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> On 05/26/14 15:00, Sudhir Khanger wrote: There is nothing glorifying in ~/.local/share/applications. You may like dead links in your

Re: printer

Hello Ed, Thank, I installed the plugin and run it but, again after a reboot, I have to reinstall the printer from hp-setup! === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physi

Re: [OT] Chrome Notice (Warning)

On 05/26/14 17:01, Sudhir Khanger wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 05/26/14 15:00, Sudhir Khanger wrote: >>> There is nothing glorifying in ~/.local/share/applications. You may like >>> dead links in your application menu. I don't. I like the concept of purging

Re: [OT] Chrome Notice (Warning)

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/26/14 15:00, Sudhir Khanger wrote: >> There is nothing glorifying in ~/.local/share/applications. You may like >> dead links in your application menu. I don't. I like the concept of purging >> everything a package installed. Any time yo

Re: [OT] Chrome Notice (Warning)

On 05/26/14 15:00, Sudhir Khanger wrote: > I like the concept of purging everything a package installed. Also, understand that installing chrome *did not* create/install files in ~/.local/share/applications They were created by the "user" running chrome. -- Do not condemn the judgment of anot

Re: [OT] Chrome Notice (Warning)

On 05/26/14 15:00, Sudhir Khanger wrote: > There is nothing glorifying in ~/.local/share/applications. You may like dead > links in your application menu. I don't. I like the concept of purging > everything a package installed. Any time you reinstall you will have deal > with conflicts. So, for

Re: [OT] Chrome Notice (Warning)

On May 26, 2014 11:16 AM, "Ed Greshko" wrote: > > On 05/26/14 13:30, Sudhir Khanger wrote: > > Has anyone tried uninstalling Chrome? It left a lot of cruft on my system mainly in the /opt/google/* and ~/.local/share/applications folders. > > I've not done an uninstall of Chrome. However, I would