On 05/23/2014 05:43 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried the following this morning on Firefox (updated from F20 repos):
>
> https://www.fortify.net/sslcheck.html
>
> and came up with 128-bit encryption. I could swear that at least the
> last time I checked it, it used to report 256-bit en
2014-05-23 9:27 GMT+03:00 Joe Zeff :
> On 05/22/2014 11:00 PM, Alchemist wrote:
>
>> Check about:config for disabled security.ssl3 fields, however mostly
>> it's about server's chosen cipher from your ClientHello preferable
>> cipher suite list.
>>
>
> I'm getting the same thing on FF 20 and F19.
On 05/22/2014 11:00 PM, Alchemist wrote:
Check about:config for disabled security.ssl3 fields, however mostly
it's about server's chosen cipher from your ClientHello preferable
cipher suite list.
I'm getting the same thing on FF 20 and F19. Which fields need to be
enabled?
--
users mailing l
2014-05-23 6:43 GMT+03:00 Ranjan Maitra :
> Hi,
>
> I tried the following this morning on Firefox (updated from F20 repos):
>
> https://www.fortify.net/sslcheck.html
>
> and came up with 128-bit encryption. I could swear that at least the
> last time I checked it, it used to report 256-bit encrypt
Hi,
I tried the following this morning on Firefox (updated from F20 repos):
https://www.fortify.net/sslcheck.html
and came up with 128-bit encryption. I could swear that at least the
last time I checked it, it used to report 256-bit encryption. I wonder
if/why this no longer holds.
I am using
Hi
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
>
> I wonder how long before some bright hacker creates a "pepper-to-npapi"
> shim??
>
Unlikely. NPAPI provides full OS access while Pepper is much more limited
by design for security reasons
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedora
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:51:32AM +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> On 22/05/14 21:34, Steven Stern wrote:
> >On 05/22/2014 02:28 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> >>After a recent fedora 20 update probably to google-chrome-stable the
> >>IcedTeaPlugin was no longer a plugin. How do I get it back again? And
On 22/05/14 21:34, Steven Stern wrote:
On 05/22/2014 02:28 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
After a recent fedora 20 update probably to google-chrome-stable the
IcedTeaPlugin was no longer a plugin. How do I get it back again? And
where does google-chrome load its plugins from?
It's a "feature" of C
On 05/22/2014 02:28 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> After a recent fedora 20 update probably to google-chrome-stable the
> IcedTeaPlugin was no longer a plugin. How do I get it back again? And
> where does google-chrome load its plugins from?
>
It's a "feature" of Chrome 35. They removed the NPAPI in
After a recent fedora 20 update probably to google-chrome-stable the
IcedTeaPlugin was no longer a plugin. How do I get it back again? And where does
google-chrome load its plugins from?
--
Erik
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
Update...
On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 22:56 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2014 16:36:13 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > I'm kind of at a loss here. I recently (yesterday, May 12) updated my
> > Fedora 20 laptop (originally a fresh install of F20 a couple of months
> > ago, no u
Tim:
>> What is wrong with the Fedora 20 CUPS client?
Rex Dieter:
> See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/CUPS1.6
>
> Sounds like you may want to install/configure cups-browsed
Thanks for the link, but the problem has been resolved. All I had to do
was *start* that service going. Neither
On Thu, 22 May 2014, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 09:50 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > bit of a beginner WRT to ACPI so i want to install the "appropriate"
> > packages on my fedora rawhide system to play with ACP, and there
> > appear to be a number of them:
>
> Please
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 09:50 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> bit of a beginner WRT to ACPI so i want to install the "appropriate"
> packages on my fedora rawhide system to play with ACP, and there
> appear to be a number of them:
Please take Rawhide questions to the Fedora Test list. The Users l
Tim wrote:
> For many years, now, I've run a CUPS server on my LAN, that any distro
> of Linux I've switched on has managed to find the printers it publishes,
> without me having to do any client configuration on the PC, other than
> making sure the firewall isn't in the way.
>
> The CUPS server
Pal, Laszlo (private) wrote:
> After a quick google it seems there is no "central" cache used anymore
> (previously nscd service maintained a central cache, but it is not
> installed by default). If this is installed at you, you may want to
> restart the relevant service
>
> nscd.x86_64 : A Name
bit of a beginner WRT to ACPI so i want to install the "appropriate"
packages on my fedora rawhide system to play with ACP, and there
appear to be a number of them:
$ yum search acpi
acpi.x86_64 : Command-line ACPI client
acpica-tools.x86_64 : ACPICA tools for the development and debug of ACPI
I do hope someone can help me here.
Running Fedora 20 fully updated. Installed JDK8 with netbeans this
evening. All good but when I select the Categories section
has only 5 java selections, no HTML or PHP, nothing.
I have been googling for hours but there's nothing of any help.
Does anyone ou
On 22 May 2014 05:27, dwoody1 wrote:
>> (3.11) and sound worked.
>> I then did a full upgrade, reboot and retested using the same program
>> (aplay) and the same sound file.
>>
>> NO SOUND.
>>
>> It would seem to me that one of the sound modules is the cause of the
>> problem. The sound modules
19 matches
Mail list logo
