On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 07:57 +0200, lee wrote:
> are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without
> restrictions management,
Care to clarify that double negative? You want something with
restrictions?
--
tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.14.3-200.fc20.i686 #1 SMP Tue May
On 05/17/14 12:52, Doug wrote:
> I get a large number of messages every day, in addition to those I filter out
> and don't see. Unfortunately, some of these
> messages seem to come in out of time sync, for one reason or another. I
> don't send everything on the incoming list to
> trash as soon
I didn't know what list to send this to, but since there has been some
discussion about Mozilla products here, I'll try this one.
I get a large number of messages every day, in addition to those I
filter out and don't see. Unfortunately, some of these
messages seem to come in out of time sync,
Fernando Cassia writes:
Yes Seamonkey suite was born first as Mozilla. But it isn't "old". I mean,
it incoporates the latest technologies and Firefox Gecko engine
And as I understand it, this conversation shouldn't *just* be about
Seamonkey. Since Mozilla is doing the dirty deed, that implic
On 05/16/2014 03:56 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>
> If you look at the "Downloads" page, you'd find a link to:
>
> http://www.palemoon.org/contributed-builds.shtml
>
> and on that page, "PM4Linux".
if you hoover over the downloads tab, THEN scroll past Pale Moon &
language packs, you get to OTHER.
On 05/16/2014 12:56 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On 05/16/2014 03:52 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
See: http://www.palemoon.org/contributed-builds.shtml
thanks, got it, installed it! when I finished it opened up a web page &
said:
You have successfully installed the Pale Moon web browser for Windows.
On 05/16/2014 12:34 PM, Paul Cartwright issued this missive:
On 05/16/2014 02:43 PM, Doug wrote:
You haven't read the right pages, I guess. It runs on Windows and
Linux, and I thik even on Mac.
I have a copy running right here on PCLinuxOS-32 KDE. I have another
copy running on Windows 8.1. (
On 05/16/2014 03:52 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
>>
> See: http://www.palemoon.org/contributed-builds.shtml
thanks, got it, installed it! when I finished it opened up a web page &
said:
You have successfully installed the Pale Moon web browser for Windows.
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux User #36
On 05/16/2014 12:34 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On 05/16/2014 02:43 PM, Doug wrote:
You haven't read the right pages, I guess. It runs on Windows and
Linux, and I thik even on Mac.
I have a copy running right here on PCLinuxOS-32 KDE. I have another
copy running on Windows 8.1. (64-bit.)
This
On 05/16/2014 02:43 PM, Doug wrote:
You haven't read the right pages, I guess. It runs on Windows and
Linux, and I thik even on Mac.
I have a copy running right here on PCLinuxOS-32 KDE. I have
another copy running on Windows 8.1. (
On 05/16/2014 12:29 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On 05/16/2014 11:50 AM, Doug wrote:
If Seamonkey is the thing you call Firefox (pffft!) then go get Pale
Moon.
--doug
according to the Pale Moon website it requires:
* Windows Vista x64/Windows 7 x64/Windows 8 x64/Server 2008 x64 or later
Yo
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Fred Smith
wrote:
> Seamonkey is the name given to the old Mozilla browser/email/kitchen-sink
> suite that was developed by Mozilla prior to firefox. (Not the
> older/original
> Netscape.
>
Yes Seamonkey suite was born first as Mozilla. But it isn't "old". I mean,
I'm trying to test Intel's SNA acceleration on Haswell, but Xorg is
not loading my settings. All of the documentation on enabling SNA is
basically the same. Create /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-intel.conf
containing
Section "Device"
Identifier "Intel Graphics"
Driver "intel"
Option
On 05/16/2014 11:50 AM, Doug wrote:
> If Seamonkey is the thing you call Firefox (pffft!) then go get Pale
> Moon.
> --doug
according to the Pale Moon website it requires:
* Windows Vista x64/Windows 7 x64/Windows 8 x64/Server 2008 x64 or later
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux User #3678
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 13:19 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> I personally use Seamonkey suite and prefer it to Firefox. But while I
> have
> no issues with DRM, maybe the SM devs can put the DRM bits in an
> optional
> package or at least make it user-configurable to disable the feature.
AFAIK that
Hi,
After running my FC19 laptop without rebooting for many months,
I rebooted and of course things had changed (due to updates) so
the system failed to come up correctly. Specifically the login
screen was fine but the KDE background is now all black except
for the cursor which has a white outline
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:57 AM, lee wrote:
> are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without
> restrictions management, and will there be one in Fedora?
>
Take your concerns to the Seamonkey Council
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/about#contact
I personally use Seamonkey
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:50:50AM -0400, Doug wrote:
>
> On 05/16/2014 01:57 AM, lee wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without
> >restrictions management, and will there be one in Fedora?
> >
> >
> If Seamonkey is the thing you call Firefox (pffft!)
On 05/16/2014 01:57 AM, lee wrote:
Hi,
are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without
restrictions management, and will there be one in Fedora?
If Seamonkey is the thing you call Firefox (pffft!) then go get Pale Moon.
--doug
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproj
19 matches
Mail list logo
