On 07.05.2014 03:23, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/06/2014 05:02 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
>> On 06/05/14 06:08 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094846
>>
>
> Thank you. Bugzilla was down when I received this, but I've checked it
> out and added myself to the CC
Hi,
I've recently installed the Fedora 20 MATE/Compiz spin. While it mostly
works fine, I'm having a few graphics problems. They seem upstream
related, but perhaps you guys have a few ideas.
1. I can't set the size or theme of the mouse pointer; the setting is
only respected in Firefox.
h
On 2014-05-06 18:18, CS_DBA wrote:
Hi all;
we've just ordered a new server
(http://www.spectrumservers.com/ssproducts/pc/viewPrd.asp?idcategory=26&idproduct=787)
Originally I tried to simply upgrade an older server with more drive
space, I installed 6 4TB drives and did a new OS install but th
On 05/06/2014 05:02 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 06/05/14 06:08 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094846
Thank you. Bugzilla was down when I received this, but I've checked it
out and added myself to the CC list. If I were reporting it, I'd base
it on the f
Hi all;
we've just ordered a new server
(http://www.spectrumservers.com/ssproducts/pc/viewPrd.asp?idcategory=26&idproduct=787)
Originally I tried to simply upgrade an older server with more drive
space, I installed 6 4TB drives and did a new OS install but the OS
would not allow me to config
On 06/05/14 06:08 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/06/2014 03:00 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 06/05/14 05:40 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 06/05/14 04:37 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/06/2014 12:49 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Shouldn't yum/rpm refuse to install if the MD5 checksum is wrong ?
Yes, I'd th
On 05/06/2014 03:00 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 06/05/14 05:40 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 06/05/14 04:37 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/06/2014 12:49 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Shouldn't yum/rpm refuse to install if the MD5 checksum is wrong ?
Yes, I'd think that it should. Open a Bugzilla.
On 06/05/14 05:40 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 06/05/14 04:37 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/06/2014 12:49 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Shouldn't yum/rpm refuse to install if the MD5 checksum is wrong ?
Yes, I'd think that it should. Open a Bugzilla.
One has been opened already.
Just in case y
On 06/05/14 04:37 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/06/2014 12:49 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Shouldn't yum/rpm refuse to install if the MD5 checksum is wrong ?
Yes, I'd think that it should. Open a Bugzilla.
One has been opened already.
--
When the rich get richer they get more powerful
and that pu
On 05/06/2014 12:49 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Shouldn't yum/rpm refuse to install if the MD5 checksum is wrong ?
Yes, I'd think that it should. Open a Bugzilla.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
On or about 05/05/2014 08:33 AM, Franklin McCormick stated for us to ponder:
> This morning update of Fedora 19 included a new Thunderbird.
> It failed and now T'bird won't run.
>
> These are the details:
>
> Updating:
> thunderbird i686 24.5.0-1.fc19
> updates
On 05/06/2014 08:02 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/06/2014 12:26 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Hasn't anyone else come across the problem with a corrupted
current thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc19.i686.rpm package in the updates
repository ?
Yeah. It's an inconvenience, but as long as yumex handles the rest of
Reposted from
http://fedoramagazine.org/five-things-in-fedora-this-week-2014-05-06/
Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to follow it all. This series
highlights interesting happenings in five different areas every week.
It isn’t comprehensive news coverage — just quick summaries with links
to e
On 05/06/2014 12:26 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Hasn't anyone else come across the problem with a corrupted
current thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc19.i686.rpm package in the updates
repository ?
Yeah. It's an inconvenience, but as long as yumex handles the rest of
the daily updates correctly, I'm not to
On 06.05.2014 15:35, Franklin McCormick wrote:
> On 06/05/14 03:26 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
>> Hasn't anyone else come across the problem with a corrupted
>> current thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc19.i686.rpm package in the updates
>> repository ?
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093927
>
On 06/05/14 03:26 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Hasn't anyone else come across the problem with a corrupted
current thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc19.i686.rpm package in the updates
repository ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093927
Big issue here is that it has a duff MD5 checksum but
yum/rpm
On 05/06/2014 12:03 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 5/5/14, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> Simplest would be to just use
>> # grep usbDataCollector /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M myhttp
>> # semodule -i myhttp.pp
>>
>> This would allot httpd_t processes the ability to use usb_device_t.
>>
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 00:21 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Every time that I reboot, I lost the queue configuration of my printer.
> I have to remove the printer and add it again.
> How can I avoid this disfunctioning in fedora 20?
Every so often someone reports this bug, but I have never been able
Bonjour,
Does anyone experienced the use of catalyst driver on Dell latitude
E6540 with video card AMD RADEON HD 8790M under fedora?
Thank you for attention.
--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints Pèr
Hasn't anyone else come across the problem with a corrupted
current thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc19.i686.rpm package in the updates
repository ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093927
Big issue here is that it has a duff MD5 checksum but
yum/rpm still tries to install it ...
--
users mail
20 matches
Mail list logo
