Re: Most Efficient Network File sharing protocol?

2014-03-03 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 20:58:36 -0600 Dan Mossor wrote: > When the DVD is built, I pull the updates across the local network to > my machine and build the DVD there. These <4GiB transfers sometimes > take close to 3 to 4 hours using NFS, and it is a Gigabit network. > rsync appeared to be a bit faster

Re: VEry OT Ruby

2014-03-03 Thread Frank Murphy
On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 11:06:20 +1100 Roger wrote: > Is is possible to run a small web site generated in Ruby on Rails > without having Rails on the server?, or one generated in Laravel for > PHP without Laravel installed. If so how? > Don't know how relevant: http://www.rubyonrailswebhost.com/ _

Re: VEry OT Ruby

2014-03-03 Thread Tim
Allegedly, on or about 04 March 2014, Roger sent: > Changing ISP is not an option. You don't have to use your ISP's webserver. In fact, I'd always advise against it. When you have an independent service, you can have your own domain, and without the extortionate charges that some ISPs demand for

Re: F19: Is this an httpd attack attempt?

2014-03-03 Thread Tim
Allegedly, on or about 03 March 2014, Dan Thurman sent: > It looks to me like a successful indirect connection? > > The following is taken from /var/log/httpd/access_log > > 185.4.227.194 - - [03/Mar/2014:07:27:49 -0800] "GET > http://24x7-allrequestsallowed.com/?PHPSESSID=1rmsxtj500143TRMUTP_OD

Re: Most Efficient Network File sharing protocol?

2014-03-03 Thread Roger Heflin
use nfs...but make sure you *read* from a nfs mount of the data and write to local disk. Note that to make a network filesystem safe during writing that it is going to usually be slower, and because of that reading is significantly faster than writing. And in general if you are using small files

Re: Most Efficient Network File sharing protocol?

2014-03-03 Thread Dan Mossor
On 02/28/2014 01:02 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Mark Haney wrote: On 02/28/14 12:07, Dan Mossor wrote: What do y'all consider the most efficient network file system? NFS? SMB? SFTP? Maybe you should outline your requirements a bit more. For example SFTP

Re: F19: Is this an httpd attack attempt?

2014-03-03 Thread Joe Zeff
On 03/03/2014 05:40 PM, Dan Thurman wrote: # Blacklist order allow,deny allow from all deny from 85.25.196.141 deny from 85.25.226.154 deny from 146.185.239.100 deny from 185.4.227.194 deny from 192.99.2.75 I'm not familiar with this, but I think I spotted a typo. Isn'

Re: F19: Is this an httpd attack attempt?

2014-03-03 Thread Rick Stevens
On 03/03/2014 05:40 PM, Dan Thurman issued this missive: On 03/03/2014 05:11 PM, Dan Thurman wrote: On 03/03/2014 03:25 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 03/03/2014 02:06 PM, eoconno...@gmail.com issued this missive: What's the best way to avoid/prevent this from happening?... Since the IP is part

Re: F19: Is this an httpd attack attempt?

2014-03-03 Thread Dan Thurman
On 03/03/2014 05:11 PM, Dan Thurman wrote: On 03/03/2014 03:25 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 03/03/2014 02:06 PM, eoconno...@gmail.com issued this missive: What's the best way to avoid/prevent this from happening?... Since the IP is part of a Turkish /24 network, odds are it's a hack attempt. If

Re: F19: Is this an httpd attack attempt?

2014-03-03 Thread Dan Thurman
On 03/03/2014 03:25 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 03/03/2014 02:06 PM, eoconno...@gmail.com issued this missive: What's the best way to avoid/prevent this from happening?... Since the IP is part of a Turkish /24 network, odds are it's a hack attempt. If you don't care about servicing Turkey, you

Re: VEry OT Ruby

2014-03-03 Thread Steven Stern
On 03/03/2014 06:06 PM, Roger wrote: > The ISP will not permit any web frameworks at all and will not install > Rails, or Laravel for php. Will not install Ruby 1.9.3 or Ruby 2.n so am > forced to Ruby 1.8.7. > > Is is possible to run a small web site generated in Ruby on Rails > without having Ra

Re: VEry OT Ruby

2014-03-03 Thread Roger
On 03/04/2014 11:06 AM, Roger wrote: The ISP will not permit any web frameworks at all and will not install Rails, or Laravel for php. Will not install Ruby 1.9.3 or Ruby 2.n so am forced to Ruby 1.8.7. Is is possible to run a small web site generated in Ruby on Rails without having Rails on

VEry OT Ruby

2014-03-03 Thread Roger
The ISP will not permit any web frameworks at all and will not install Rails, or Laravel for php. Will not install Ruby 1.9.3 or Ruby 2.n so am forced to Ruby 1.8.7. Is is possible to run a small web site generated in Ruby on Rails without having Rails on the server?, or one generated in Larav

Re: F19: Is this an httpd attack attempt?

2014-03-03 Thread Rick Stevens
On 03/03/2014 02:06 PM, eoconno...@gmail.com issued this missive: What's the best way to avoid/prevent this from happening?... Since the IP is part of a Turkish /24 network, odds are it's a hack attempt. If you don't care about servicing Turkey, you could block that IP space in your firewall. P

Re: F19: Is this an httpd attack attempt?

2014-03-03 Thread eoconno...@gmail.com
What's the best way to avoid/prevent this from happening?... - Reply message - From: "Mark Haney" To: Subject: F19: Is this an httpd attack attempt? Date: Mon, Mar 3, 2014 11:59 am -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/03/14 11:42, Dan Thurman wrote: > > It looks to m

Re: F19: Is this an httpd attack attempt?

2014-03-03 Thread Mark Haney
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/03/14 11:42, Dan Thurman wrote: > > It looks to me like a successful indirect connection? > > The following is taken from /var/log/httpd/access_log > > 185.4.227.194 - - [03/Mar/2014:07:27:49 -0800] "GET > http://24x7-allrequestsallowed.com

Re: Pacman game availability for Fedora

2014-03-03 Thread Paul Smith
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: >> I thank Fernando and the other two respondents. I have tried >> ArcadeFlex (after 'yum install icedtea-web'), but all I get is a white >> square... The OpenJDK version does not work well on my F19, as the >> board is too big for the availab

F19: Is this an httpd attack attempt?

2014-03-03 Thread Dan Thurman
It looks to me like a successful indirect connection? The following is taken from /var/log/httpd/access_log 185.4.227.194 - - [03/Mar/2014:07:27:49 -0800] "GET http://24x7-allrequestsallowed.com/?PHPSESSID=1rmsxtj500143TRMUTP_ODZZWA HTTP/1.1" 200 5264 "-" "-" -- users mailing list users@lis

Re: vtnr? seat0? What does this gibberish mean?

2014-03-03 Thread poma
On 03.03.2014 15:18, Tom Horsley wrote: > I've started getting lots of these in my logs: > > crond: pam_systemd(crond:session): Ignoring vtnr 0 for which is not seat0 > pam_systemd(sshd:session): Ignoring vtnr 0 for which is not seat0 > > I'm sure I can just ignore them, but what the heck do th

vtnr? seat0? What does this gibberish mean?

2014-03-03 Thread Tom Horsley
I've started getting lots of these in my logs: crond: pam_systemd(crond:session): Ignoring vtnr 0 for which is not seat0 pam_systemd(sshd:session): Ignoring vtnr 0 for which is not seat0 I'm sure I can just ignore them, but what the heck do they mean? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedorapr

Re: anyone playing with nftables on fedora 20? thoughts?

2014-03-03 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Mon, 3 Mar 2014, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > someone asked me to take a look at nftables running on fedora 20, so > google was very helpful: > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.netfilter.devel/50827 > > etc, etc. this would be strictly on a test machine, so i can affor

anyone playing with nftables on fedora 20? thoughts?

2014-03-03 Thread Robert P. J. Day
someone asked me to take a look at nftables running on fedora 20, so google was very helpful: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.netfilter.devel/50827 etc, etc. this would be strictly on a test machine, so i can afford to goof around and make mistakes. it's a fuly-updated