On 02/27/2014 02:38 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/27/14 09:27, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On attempting to install get_iplayer yum gives me:
Error: Package: get_iplayer-2.85-5.fc20.noarch (rpmfusion-free-updates)
Requires: perl(Streamer)
Error: Package: get_iplayer-2.85-5.fc20.noarc
On 02/27/14 09:55, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I am trying by vnc uisng ssh tunnelin,
> It does ask me for the password, and then wait
> connectiong to 196.49. through ssh tunnel for ever.
On the server side. Your user should have a ~/.vnc directory and there should
be a "log" file.
Does that f
> - Original Message -
> From: Ed Greshko
> Sent: 02/27/14 02:38 AM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: vncviewer
>
> On 02/27/14 09:36, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: Ed Greshko
> >> Sent: 02/27/14 02:24 AM
> >> To: Community su
On 02/27/14 09:27, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On attempting to install get_iplayer yum gives me:
>
>
>
> Error: Package: get_iplayer-2.85-5.fc20.noarch (rpmfusion-free-updates)
>Requires: perl(Streamer)
> Error: Package: get_iplayer-2.85-5.fc20.noarch (rpmfusion-free-updates)
>
On 02/27/14 09:36, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Ed Greshko
>> Sent: 02/27/14 02:24 AM
>> To: Community support for Fedora users
>> Subject: Re: vncviewer
>>
>> On 02/27/14 09:13, Patrick Dupre wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ed Greshko
Sen
> - Original Message -
> From: Ed Greshko
> Sent: 02/27/14 02:24 AM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: vncviewer
>
> On 02/27/14 09:13, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: Ed Greshko
> >> Sent: 02/27/14 02:10 AM
> >> To: Community su
On 02/27/14 01:53, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 23:45 +0600, g wrote:
<<<>>>
bob know what it means. :-)
As do I, now that you've said you meant "s/n ratio".
granted, due to s/n also abrivs 'serial number'.
next time i will use the other abriv - s2n. :-)
<<
On attempting to install get_iplayer yum gives me:
Error: Package: get_iplayer-2.85-5.fc20.noarch (rpmfusion-free-updates)
Requires: perl(Streamer)
Error: Package: get_iplayer-2.85-5.fc20.noarch (rpmfusion-free-updates)
Requires: perl(Programme::bbclive)
Error: Package: get
On 02/27/14 09:13, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Ed Greshko
>> Sent: 02/27/14 02:10 AM
>> To: Community support for Fedora users
>> Subject: Re: vncviewer
>>
>> On 02/27/14 09:06, Patrick Dupre wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ed Greshko
Sen
On 02/27/14 09:13, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Ed Greshko
>> Sent: 02/27/14 02:10 AM
>> To: Community support for Fedora users
>> Subject: Re: vncviewer
>>
>> On 02/27/14 09:06, Patrick Dupre wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ed Greshko
Sen
On 02/27/14 09:13, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I just get a text window
> how can I get a graphics window?
The protocol you want is "VNC - Virtual Network Computing".
See
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2H9v1dYNcvpY2VJdTNYcVZpc2M/edit?usp=sharing
and
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2H9v1d
> - Original Message -
> From: Ed Greshko
> Sent: 02/27/14 02:10 AM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: vncviewer
>
> On 02/27/14 09:06, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: Ed Greshko
> >> Sent: 02/27/14 01:56 AM
> >> To: Community su
On 02/27/14 09:06, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Ed Greshko
>> Sent: 02/27/14 01:56 AM
>> To: Community support for Fedora users
>> Subject: Re: vncviewer
>>
>> Oh
>>
>> You said ssh works.
>>
>> You should use vncviewer over an ssh tunnel in that case.
> - Original Message -
> From: Ed Greshko
> Sent: 02/27/14 01:56 AM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: vncviewer
>
> Oh
>
> You said ssh works.
>
> You should use vncviewer over an ssh tunnel in that case.
>
> The "easiest" way to do that would be to u
Oh
You said ssh works.
You should use vncviewer over an ssh tunnel in that case.
The "easiest" way to do that would be to use a graphical client such as
"remmina".
Ed
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.
On 02/27/14 08:45, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Ed Greshko
>> Sent: 02/27/14 01:36 AM
>> To: Community support for Fedora users
>> Subject: Re: vncviewer
>>
>> On 02/27/14 08:33, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>>> Are you sure?
>>>
>>> telnet connections are not accepted on
On 02/27/14 08:33, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> telnet connections are not accepted on the machine.
> telnet machine x (x=0,1) gives No route to host
In your example x should be 5901 not 0 or 1.
In "telnet" the last number is the Port.
In "vncviewer" the last number is the Display number. vncviewer
> - Original Message -
> From: Ed Greshko
> Sent: 02/27/14 01:36 AM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: vncviewer
>
> On 02/27/14 08:33, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Are you sure?
> >
> > telnet connections are not accepted on the machine.
> > telnet machine x (x=0,1) giv
On 02/27/14 08:33, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Are you sure?
>
> telnet connections are not accepted on the machine.
> telnet machine x (x=0,1) gives No route to host
>
> vncviewer 193.49.194.196:0
> or
> vncviewer 193.49.194.196:1
> give
>
> main:unable connect to socket: No route to host (1
> - Original Message -
> From: Ed Greshko
> Sent: 02/27/14 01:15 AM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: vncviewer
>
> On 02/27/14 08:13, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > telnet: connect to address 193.49.194.1xx: No route to host
> > (with the correct IP)
> > ssh works OK!
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Pittigher, Raymond - ES
> Sent: 02/27/14 12:47 AM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: RE: vncviewer
>
> Just do a iptables -F at a command line to see if that is the problem before
> you go crazy with trying to configure the ports.
iptable
On 02/27/14 08:13, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> telnet: connect to address 193.49.194.1xx: No route to host
> (with the correct IP)
> ssh works OK!
> why no route again!
Because you are int specifying the PORT NUMBER!
--
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
--
users maili
> - Original Message -
> From: Ed Greshko
> Sent: 02/27/14 01:05 AM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: vncviewer
>
> On 02/27/14 07:41, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > PORT STATE SERVICE
> > 5900/tcp closed vnc
> > 5901/tcp open vnc-1
> > 5902/tcp closed vnc-2
> > 5903/tcp
One more thing.
When using vncviewer make sure you specify the display #.
vncviewer 192.168.1.227 would attempt to connect to 0 which is port 5900 .
on which you don't have a server running.
You want.
vncviewer 192.168.1.227:1 to connect to port 5901 !
Use the proper IP address, o
On 02/27/14 07:41, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> PORT STATE SERVICE
> 5900/tcp closed vnc
> 5901/tcp open vnc-1
> 5902/tcp closed vnc-2
> 5903/tcp closed vnc-3
> 5904/tcp closed unknown
> 5905/tcp open unknown
> 5906/tcp open unknown
"closed" means the port is not blocked/filtered by the firew
On 02/27/14 05:43, Tom Rivers wrote:
> I'm not sure telnet is the way to go because if memory serves it isn't
> installed by default.
FYI, it is the telnet server that is not installed by default. The client
is
--
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
--
users ma
Just do a iptables -F at a command line to see if that is the problem before
you go crazy with trying to configure the ports.
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] on behalf of Patrick Dupre
[pdu...@gmx.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 6:4
>
> OK, the ports 5905 and 5906 are open and in use locally. Unfortunately,
> your previous scan results didn't show the status of those same ports
> from the remote machine. Try the following command on the remote machine:
>
> nmap -v -n -P0 -p5905-5906 193.49.194.19
>
> If the ports aren't s
On 02/27/14 07:00, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Neither do I. This is the first thing I tried and where I started to get
> confused. The system tray (as I wrote) **used to** have two rows before I
> dinked with
> System Settings->Applications Appearance
> or possible before a system update (bo
On Wed 26 February 2014 14:30:57 Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 22:02 +, Colin J Thomson wrote:
> > On Wed 26 February 2014 12:36:56 Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > > My system tray used to have two rows of small icons. Now it has one
> > > row: items that hide themselves into the
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 06:38 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 02/27/14 06:30, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> >
> > This only makes things worse. The large (native) icons get larger,
> > while the icons put into the tray by applications stay the same size. A
> > screenshot is attached. The tray does not
On 02/27/14 06:30, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> This only makes things worse. The large (native) icons get larger,
> while the icons put into the tray by applications stay the same size. A
> screenshot is attached. The tray does not become two row. Just to be
> clear, I am asking about the *tray*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/27/14 05:50, Dale Dellutri wrote:
> I did this and set selinux back to enforcing. google-chrome
> is now working as it should.
Good to see it is OK now. FWIW, I have a fully updated F20 system. I'm using
KDE and google chrome and I am not s
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 22:02 +, Colin J Thomson wrote:
> On Wed 26 February 2014 12:36:56 Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > My system tray used to have two rows of small icons. Now it has one
> > row: items that hide themselves into the tray are small and not
> > resizeable (Thunderbird, Qalculate, K
> - Original Message -
> From: Tom Rivers
> Sent: 02/26/14 11:08 PM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: vncviewer
>
> On 2/26/2014 17:01, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > # nmap -v -n -P0 -p5900-5910 localhost
> >
> > Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-02-26 23:00
On 2/26/2014 17:01, Patrick Dupre wrote:
# nmap -v -n -P0 -p5900-5910 localhost
Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-02-26 23:00 CET
Initiating SYN Stealth Scan at 23:00
Scanning localhost (127.0.0.1) [11 ports]
Discovered open port 5905/tcp on 127.0.0.1
Discovered open port 5906/tcp o
On Wed 26 February 2014 12:36:56 Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> My system tray used to have two rows of small icons. Now it has one
> row: items that hide themselves into the tray are small and not
> resizeable (Thunderbird, Qalculate, Knemo); native widgets are large and
> resizeable (Klipper, Kmix, D
> - Original Message -
> From: Tom Rivers
> Sent: 02/26/14 10:56 PM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: vncviewer
>
> On 2/26/2014 16:49, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Starting Nmap 6.01 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-02-26 22:47 CET
> > Initiating SYN Stealth Scan at 22:47
>
On 2/26/2014 16:49, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Starting Nmap 6.01 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-02-26 22:47 CET
Initiating SYN Stealth Scan at 22:47
Scanning 193.49.194.19 [4 ports]
Completed SYN Stealth Scan at 22:47, 3.01s elapsed (4 total ports)
Nmap scan report for 193.49.194.19
Host is up.
PORT
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/26/2014 02:00 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
>> I've got a Fedora 20 XFCE desktop. I installed google-chrome. It fails to
>> display some text on many web sites if selinux is set to enforc
> >> Can you telnet to the VNC port on the server?
> > How I do it?
>
> I'm not sure telnet is the way to go because if memory serves it isn't
> installed by default. The best way to check is to use a port scanner to
> see the status of the port on the target system. The tool I use is
> called
On 2/26/2014 16:25, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Can you telnet to the VNC port on the server?
How I do it?
I'm not sure telnet is the way to go because if memory serves it isn't
installed by default. The best way to check is to use a port scanner to
see the status of the port on the target system.
> - Original Message -
> From: Mark Haney
> Sent: 02/26/14 10:20 PM
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: vncviewer
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 02/26/14 16:07, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >
> >> Turn it off and see if it works.
> >
> > It d
> > Hello,
> >
> > vncviewer gives me:
> > unable connect socket: No route to host (113) fedora
> >
> > I browsed the web, and tried sevral options without succes!
> >
>
> It is probable a firewall issue on the machine running the server. I have
> vncserver running on my classroom machines, a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/26/14 16:07, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
>> Turn it off and see if it works.
>
> It does not change anything, still unable connect to socket: No
> route to host (113)
>
> ssh works fine
>
Can you telnet to the VNC port on the server?
- --
Mark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/26/2014 02:00 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
> I've got a Fedora 20 XFCE desktop. I installed google-chrome. It fails to
> display some text on many web sites if selinux is set to enforcing, but
> shows the text with selinux set to permissive.
>
> Fo
> Turn it off and see if it works.
It does not change anything, still
unable connect to socket: No route to host (113)
ssh works fine
> -
>
>
> From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> [users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] on behalf of Patrick
On 26 Feb 2014 at 19:46, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:46:59 +0100
From: "Patrick Dupre"
Subject:vncviewer
To: fedora
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
> Hello,
>
> vncvi
My system tray used to have two rows of small icons. Now it has one
row: items that hide themselves into the tray are small and not
resizeable (Thunderbird, Qalculate, Knemo); native widgets are large and
resizeable (Klipper, Kmix, Device Notifier, Network Management). The
Pager and Task Manager
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/26/14 14:57, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Subject: RE: vncviewer
>>
>> Is the firewall running?
>
> Yes, but I checked public/vnc-server (and ssh)
>
>>
Since you're not really giving us much to go on, here's what I would do.
Make sure the vnc s
Turn it off and see if it works.
-
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] on behalf of Patrick Dupre
[pdu...@gmx.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 2:57 PM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: R
Subject: RE: vncviewer
>
> Is the firewall running?
Yes, but I checked public/vnc-server (and ssh)
>
>
> From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> [users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] on behalf of Mark Haney
> [mha...@practichem.com]
> Sent: We
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 23:45 +0600, g wrote:
> > I've a feeling we're talking at cross purposes, but here goes:
>
> not sure what you mean by "cross purposes", but, that is ok with
> me. ;-)
>
> >> now that the s/n has dropped, and i have finished playing with
> >> '.bashrc', 'alias', and a script
Is the firewall running?
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] on behalf of Mark Haney
[mha...@practichem.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 2:00 PM
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: vncviewe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/26/14 13:46, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> vncviewer gives me: unable connect socket: No route to host (113)
> fedora
>
> I browsed the web, and tried sevral options without succes!
>
Could you be slightly less specific?
In all honesty
I've got a Fedora 20 XFCE desktop. I installed google-chrome.
It fails to display some text on many web sites if selinux is
set to enforcing, but shows the text with selinux set to permissive.
For example, with selinux set to enforcing, my web site:
http://www.DaleDellutri.com
only shows the ic
Hello,
vncviewer gives me:
unable connect socket: No route to host (113) fedora
I browsed the web, and tried sevral options without succes!
Thank
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
"Lars E. Pettersson" writes:
> The syslog daemon writes whatever systemd sends to it. On one of my
> systems systemd decided to send the whole systemd journal to the
> syslog daemon, by doing so starting to write log lines from last year
> in my /var/log/messages.
What is the purpose of this log
hello poco,
On 02/26/14 16:43, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 14:07 +0600, g wrote:
<<<>>>
<>
>>
ok, all.
I've a feeling we're talking at cross purposes, but here goes:
not sure what you mean by "cross purposes", but, that is ok with
me. ;-)
now that the s/n h
On 24.02.2014 13:43, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> For a long time I have been doing:
>
> /etc/locale.confchange:LANG="en_US.UTF-8"
>
> LANG="en_GB.UTF-8"
>
> To make Thunderbird list messages with 24 hour time.
>
> Can someone suggest a better way to accomplish this?
>
> Bob
>
/usr/bin/th
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 14:07 +0600, g wrote:
>
> On 02/25/14 20:52, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Joachim Backes
> > wrote:
> >>> That will have absolutely no effect on any currently running program,
> >>> including the desktop you're working in. Processes inher
To correct the 'file' output, instead
$ file -b *
RPM v3.0 bin noarch kdenetwork-devel-7:4.12.2-1.fc20
RPM v3.0 bin ARM mdds-devel-0.10.2-1.fc20
we can drive something like this,
$ rpm -qp --qf "RPM v%{RPMVERSION} %{ARCH}\
%{NAME}-%{VERSION}.%{RELEASE}\n" *
RPM v4.11.1 noarch kdenetwork-devel-4.1
On 26.02.2014 08:50, Jan Kaluža wrote:
> On 02/26/2014 03:08 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 24.02.2014 23:52, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 02/25/14 01:02, poma wrote:
$ file *
autocorr-en-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin ARM
autocorr-en-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libcmis-0.4.1-
On 02/25/14 20:52, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Joachim Backes
wrote:
That will have absolutely no effect on any currently running program,
including the desktop you're working in. Processes inherit external
variables from the process that executed them, so onl
64 matches
Mail list logo
