Almost as mysteriously as sound stopped working, it
has now started working again. The default pulseaudio
output has always been set to HDMI, but my motherboard
does look like two separate audio devices to linux,
so there were two "profiles".
Apparently some randomly selected collection of apps
st
On Feb 8, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 02/07/2014 06:54 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> And here is a recent thread, just under one year old….
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/23/107
>>
>> Anyway, the fs developers have been speaking about it quite a bit and for a
>> long ti
I've had quite a challenge getting Fedora 20 to work on any of my
machines, but I have finally managed to work through the issues and I
have it running on two of them. The problem I'm having now is that I am
not able to select the Desktop Environment at Login. In the past, I
have always insta
Is there some sort of configuration that needs to be done with the
Radeon Driver to get resolutions higher than 1280 x 1024 ? My system
looks like crap at that resolution but its seems to be the best I can get.
The above is the only question that I have, the below rounds out why I
am asking an
The appearance of gtk (Gnome) applications under KDE is controlled by a
System Settings function:
System Settings->Application Appearance->GTK+ Appearance->Widget
Style
which works as advertised: the theme chosen for the widget style affects
Gnome applications (in particular evolu
On 02/07/2014 06:54 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
And here is a recent thread, just under one year old….
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/23/107
Anyway, the fs developers have been speaking about it quite a bit and for a
long time.
I guess I could have Google'd for this, but after reading over a few o
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 13:08:13 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > # yum install 'libunique-1.0.so.0()(64bit)'
> >
>
> No, that won't work.
Just give it a try. ;-)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
On 02/08/2014 12:22 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 08/02/14 12:30, Michael Schwendt wrote:
# yum whatprovides libunique-1.0.so.0*
Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, langpacks, refresh-packagekit
unique-1.1.6-10.fc20.i686 : Single instance support for applic
On Feb 8, 2014, at 1:52 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>
> Another key element is clicking Update Settings before you click on any other
> mount point.
Or before clicking on Done… Or just click it even if you think you don't need
to, because you can't click it too often.
Chris Murphy
--
user
On Feb 8, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Feb 8, 2014, at 10:51 AM, sam tygier wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to install with an encrypted /home, but unencrypted /. I would also
>> like to use BTRFS.
>>
>> Currently if I try to make 2 BTRFS partitions anaconda actually makes 1
On Feb 8, 2014, at 10:51 AM, sam tygier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to install with an encrypted /home, but unencrypted /. I would also
> like to use BTRFS.
>
> Currently if I try to make 2 BTRFS partitions anaconda actually makes 1
> partition with 2 subvolumes. This means they will share enc
On 08/02/14 12:30, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> This appears to be an exceptional case,
It has always been like that.
> I've done this many times and
> yum has always provided the 64 bit file or at least a file that works.
You likely confuse library package names with library file names
and wit
On 08/02/14 12:30, Frank Murphy wrote:
If you do not want or use i686 rpms,
Skype, grub-efi?
edit /etc/yum.conf
add in the following:
exclude=*i?86*
this will prevent yum returning 32bit matches.
dnf.conf should provide similar for dnf
___
Regards
Frank
That would kill some old applicati
Hi,
I'd like to install with an encrypted /home, but unencrypted /. I would also
like to use BTRFS.
Currently if I try to make 2 BTRFS partitions anaconda actually makes 1
partition with 2 subvolumes. This means they will share encryption options. I
think this is because anaconda considers BT
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:41:13 -0500, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> ># yum install 'libunique-1.0.so.0()(64bit)'
> >…
> >
> >> > Is my
> >> > command wrong, that's what the rpm shows as a missing dependency so I
> >> > just try to yum install that?
> > Yes, it's wrong.;-)
> >
>
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:30:15 -0500
"Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA" wrote:
> And notecase_pro-3.8.7-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm expects x86_64 so will not
> install!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bob
>
If you do not want or use i686 rpms,
Skype, grub-efi?
edit /etc/yum.conf
add in the following:
exclude=*i?86*
On Fri, 07 Feb 2014 13:37:03 -0800, Rick Stevens wrote:
[]
> Probably not clear. As root, run dconf-editor. The left pane will
> probably contain a list of stuff like:
>
> > apps ca desktop org system
>
> There may be some others, too. Anyway, click on the arrow to the left of
On 08/02/14 10:13, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Because you've _not_ asked for the x86_64 lib. That one is marked
differently in the packages:
# repoquery --whatprovides 'libunique-1.0.so.0()(64bit)'
unique-0:1.1.6-10.fc20.x86_64
# yum whatprovides 'libunique-1.0.so.0()(64bit)'Loaded plugi
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:44:51 -0500, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>
> On 08/02/14 08:36, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >> > Am I missing something?
> > Yes. Why do you install an i686 library package manually like that?
> > If you want the x86_64 lib, you need to specify it correctly.
> Ex
On 02/07/2014 01:20 PM, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 07 February 2014, Roger sent:
>> Is it possible, while the pc is switched on during the day to use the
>> CentOS as a server for development without affecting or accessing my
>> working Linux installations?
> Unless you're sharing some
On 08/02/14 08:36, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Am I missing something?
Yes. Why do you install an i686 library package manually like that?
If you want the x86_64 lib, you need to specify it correctly.
Exactly, that is my question, why is it installing the i686? Is my
command wrong, that's what t
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 04:30:10 -0500, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>
> I find Notecase Pro indispensable and it is one of the first things I
> install when setting up a new Fedora Linux system. I just installed
> Fedora-20 and Centos-6.5 on another computer and in both cases the rpm
On 08/02/14 07:04, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 8 February 2014 11:30, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
wrote:
I find Notecase Pro indispensable and it is one of the first
things I install when setting up a new Fedora Linux system. I just
installed Fedora-20 and Centos-6.5 on another c
On 8 February 2014 11:30, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA <
bobgood...@wildblue.net> wrote:
>
> I find Notecase Pro indispensable and it is one of the first things I
> install when setting up a new Fedora Linux system. I just installed
> Fedora-20 and Centos-6.5 on another computer and in both c
Hi, all.
Could anybody tell me where Fedora's Backup program writes its logs to?
Any help appreciated.
Cheers,
Phil...
--
currently (ab)using
Arch Linux, CentOS 6.5, Debian Squeeze & Wheezy, Fedora 19 & 20, OS X
Snow Leopard, RHEL 7, Ubuntu Saucy
GnuGPG Key : http://phildobbin.org/publickey
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Pete Travis wrote:
... snip valuable context related to "sftp" ... :-)
> ... In fact, many RH writers also volunteer their time in Fedora
> Docs, and the maintainers of the System Administrators Guide are
> among the most active Fedora writers. The content is CC-BY-SA both
> w
I find Notecase Pro indispensable and it is one of the first things I
install when setting up a new Fedora Linux system. I just installed
Fedora-20 and Centos-6.5 on another computer and in both cases the rpm
[notecase_pro-3.8.7-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm] would not run due to dependency
problems. Yum
27 matches
Mail list logo
