On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 04:27:28 am Steven Stern wrote:
> On 01/25/2014 04:48 AM, Roger wrote:
> > Hello
> > I have several very lengthy pdf documents which I need to adjust.
> > I need to remove the first 30-50 pages of cruft and the last 5-20 pages
> > and several middle pages then save the altered d
> $ rpm -qip
>
> | grep Signature
> Signature : DSA/SHA1, Thu 21 Nov 2013 01:00:01 AM CET, Key ID
> 6d124fa1f5421236
Btw, forgot to mention that:
yum install
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/SeaEagle1/Fedora_19/x86_64/sylfilter-0.8-12.1.x86_64.rpm
installs sylfilter. No need fo
On 01/25/2014 05:37 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Hmm, so this isn't working for me for some reason. Even though I've got it
disabled, it's still sucking down updates if gnome-shell runs. So I'm actually
not sure what this service does, or what I need to disable to prevent them from
being downloaded
> - Original Message -
> From: Ed Greshko
> Sent: 01/26/14 12:49 AM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: texlive
>
> On 01/26/14 07:44, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> It looks like that in the fedora20, in the package texlive-babel
> >> the following fi
On 01/26/14 07:44, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> It looks like that in the fedora20, in the package texlive-babel
>> the following file:
>> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/babelbib/french.ldf
>> has been replaced by:
>> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/babelbib/francais.ldf
>
> Hello,
>
> It looks like that in the fedora20, in the package texlive-babel
> the following file:
> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/babelbib/french.ldf
> has been replaced by:
> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/babelbib/francais.ldf
>
> which becomes incompatible with lyx wh
On Jan 23, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> systemctl disable packagekit-offline-update.service
> systemctl stop packagekit-offline-update.service
Hmm, so this isn't working for me for some reason. Even though I've got it
disabled, it's still sucking down updates if gnome-shell runs.
Hello,
It looks like that in the fedora20, in the package texlive-babel
the following file:
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/babelbib/french.ldf
has been replaced by:
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/babelbib/francais.ldf
which becomes incompatible with lyx which only manages french
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:33:40 -0800
Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 01/25/2014 12:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 01/25/14 22:00, Tom Horsley wrote:
> >> It seems pretty clear no testing of systemd has been
> >> done on systems that are up 24/7 and need to survive
> >> a run of cron.daily
> >
> > My system ru
On 01/25/2014 12:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/25/14 22:00, Tom Horsley wrote:
It seems pretty clear no testing of systemd has been
done on systems that are up 24/7 and need to survive
a run of cron.daily
My system runs 24/7. I've got 0 problems.
Yup! Running projects for WCG and Einstei
On 01/25/14 22:00, Tom Horsley wrote:
> It seems pretty clear no testing of systemd has been
> done on systems that are up 24/7 and need to survive
> a run of cron.daily
My system runs 24/7. I've got 0 problems.
--
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
--
users mailing
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 09:00:49 -0500
Tom Horsley wrote:
> This bugzilla is absurd:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043212
>
> I've just added a new entry to it because last night's
> disruption corrupted the binary format journal files
> and sent rsyslogd into a 100% cpu loop eve
> > Enterprise customers are gonna love RHEL 7...
>
> But Tom, surely most desktop users of Fedora don't leave their systems up
> 24x7. The easy solution is to remove cron.d daily. After all, the scripts
> it runs will probably just try to e-mail the results and there's no MTA
> since desktop us
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 06:13:18PM +, David G. Miller wrote:
> Tom Horsley gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > This bugzilla is absurd:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043212
> >
> > I've just added a new entry to it because last night's
> > disruption corrupted the binary fo
Tom Horsley gmail.com> writes:
>
> This bugzilla is absurd:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043212
>
> I've just added a new entry to it because last night's
> disruption corrupted the binary format journal files
> and sent rsyslogd into a 100% cpu loop even after
> a reboot.
On 25/01/14 10:52, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 23.01.2014 22:14, poma wrote:
1.
Log in
2.
Print the file name of the terminal:
$ tty
/dev/tty1
3.
Log in as root:
$ su -
4.
Set the default target to boot into:
# systemctl set-default multi-user.target
5.
Check the default
On 01/25/2014 04:48 AM, Roger wrote:
> Hello
> I have several very lengthy pdf documents which I need to adjust.
> I need to remove the first 30-50 pages of cruft and the last 5-20 pages
> and several middle pages then save the altered document either as pdf or
> something else.
> Can this be done
Quoting Roger :
Hello
I have several very lengthy pdf documents which I need to adjust.
I need to remove the first 30-50 pages of cruft and the last 5-20
pages and several middle pages then save the altered document either
as pdf or something else.
Can this be done with convert or is there
Since I upgraded to kernel-3.12.8-300.fc20.x86_64 a couple of days ago (I
have never seen this with any other Fx or kernel), I am getting this message
appearing in the notifications applet in the systray.
It appears every time I resume the computer from suspend. I have never seen
it from a stra
On 01/20/2014 10:13 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Robert Moskowitz said:
>> On 01/20/2014 06:47 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>> On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 06:45:54 -0800
>>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>>
> The day will come when all OS providers,
> will give cutoff for 32bit hardware\code
> IIUC, the alternatives/symlinks are broken on your installation because they
> weren't updated when java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60*-2.4.4.1.fc20.x86_64 were
> updated due to the selinux bug; if you now have the fixed selinux package,
> reinstalling java-1.7.0-openjdk-headless should fix the issue as
On 24/01/14 16:58, poma wrote:
On 24.01.2014 17:16, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 23/01/14 17:26, poma wrote:
On 23.01.2014 22:14, poma wrote:
On 22.01.2014 18:55, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
Now I have another problem where user "bobg" is not authorized!
…
If I
On 25 January 2014 14:29, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> > I guess you'd need to reinstall java-1.7.0-openjdk-headless, this the
> > package that sets the alternatives as part of its postinstall scripts.
>
> I already tested that but the package seems corrupted according to
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 02:40:47PM +0100, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> pdftk A=long.pdf cat A51-60 output short.pdf
I use pdftk too; quite simple to use. But for the sake of completeness
I should mention gs (Ghostscript); not so easy to use, but provides more
control.
--
Suvayu
Open source is the fu
This bugzilla is absurd:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043212
I've just added a new entry to it because last night's
disruption corrupted the binary format journal files
and sent rsyslogd into a 100% cpu loop even after
a reboot.
It seems highly likely that all these bugs are also
pdftk A=long.pdf cat A51-60 output short.pdf
Frédéric
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedor
> I guess you'd need to reinstall java-1.7.0-openjdk-headless, this the
> package that sets the alternatives as part of its postinstall scripts.
I already tested that but the package seems corrupted according to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056187
Frédéric
--
users mailing list
u
On 25 January 2014 14:24, Ahmad Samir wrote:
> On 25 January 2014 09:51, Frédéric Bron wrote:
>
>> > Thanks, this looked to be useful. However, I still do not have java
>> > working. I reinstalled java-1.7.0-openjdk. The package
>> > java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc20.x86_64 is installed.
On 25 January 2014 09:51, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> > Thanks, this looked to be useful. However, I still do not have java
> > working. I reinstalled java-1.7.0-openjdk. The package
> > java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.fc20.x86_64 is installed.
> >
> > However the link in alternative is
> > /usr/l
I ran 'yum distro-sync --setopt=deltarpm=0' and got 2 downgrades which
is fine as now 'yum check' does not report any error anymore.
The downgrade where: python-urlgrabber and xorg-x11-drv-modesetting.
Thanks,
Frédéric
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change su
I am under KDE and I can see the sound icon which is not disabled.
Internal analog stereo audio is at 100% but no sound when I listen to
mp3 in VLC or in DragonPlayer or anything else.
I upgraded from F18 using fedup and everything was fine apart from this.
What can I do to find what's the issue?
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014, Rami Rosen wrote:
> Hi Roger,
> This can be done with pdtk tool (which can be installed simply by: yum
> -y install pdftk).
>
> see:
> http://www.linux.com/learn/tutorials/442414-manipulating-pdfs-with-the-pdf-toolkit
yup, i use pdftk for this all the time.
rday
--
Hi Roger,
This can be done with pdtk tool (which can be installed simply by: yum
-y install pdftk).
see:
http://www.linux.com/learn/tutorials/442414-manipulating-pdfs-with-the-pdf-toolkit
Best Regards,
Rami Rosen
http://ramirose.wix.com/ramirosen
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Roger wr
Hello
I have several very lengthy pdf documents which I need to adjust.
I need to remove the first 30-50 pages of cruft and the last 5-20 pages
and several middle pages then save the altered document either as pdf or
something else.
Can this be done with convert or is there another suitable tool
On 25 January 2014 11:39, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 01/25/14 16:45, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> > I am running F20. I first installed F18 I guessed or F17, I do not
> > remember well and used fedup to update my installation.
> >
> > However, when I can see that packages with .fc17 .fc18 and .fc19 in
> >
On 01/25/14 16:45, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> I am running F20. I first installed F18 I guessed or F17, I do not
> remember well and used fedup to update my installation.
>
> However, when I can see that packages with .fc17 .fc18 and .fc19 in
> there name are still installed (see below). Is that normal
I am running F20. I first installed F18 I guessed or F17, I do not
remember well and used fedup to update my installation.
However, when I can see that packages with .fc17 .fc18 and .fc19 in
there name are still installed (see below). Is that normal?
Frédéric
# yum list installed|grep "\(fc17\|f
37 matches
Mail list logo
