On 12/23/13 06:54, John Aldrich wrote:
> And now running "yum distro-sync" results in the system trying to roll back
> everything. When I look in YUMEX it shows all the repos as F18, not F20. How
> do I fix that???
What does "cat /etc/os-release" reveal?
--
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussi
On 12/22/2013 02:54 PM, John Aldrich wrote:
And now running "yum distro-sync" results in the system trying to roll back
everything. When I look in YUMEX it shows all the repos as F18, not F20. How
do I fix that???
Try running package-cleanup --dupes and look for the F18 version of
releasever.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
> At some point I'd like to move away from depending on Oracle
You might want to remove all the Oracle contributed patches to the Linux
kernel too, and btrfs, and OpenJDK... *rolleyes*
http://goo.gl/u3dOk7
FC
--
During times of Universal Dec
On Dec 22, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Sam Varshavchik writes:
>
>> Trying to upgrade F19-F20 using fedup --iso with luks-encrypted partitions.
>>
>> The upgrade stops after "Mounted /boot", and does not proceed, no further
>> errors. Nothing appears to be running.
>>
>> I di
Hello, Everyone
I just ran "yum update" and rebooted. Some time not long after that
reboot, I started getting message like this:
Dec 22 20:11:26 afolkey2 kernel: [ 4130.161465] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck
for 22s! [httpd:1889]
I ran "grep -i "soft lockup"" with the following results:
[root@a
"Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:"
>
> On 22.12.2013 22:49, David Highley wrote:
> > "David Highley wrote:"
> >>
> >> "Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:"
> >>>
> >>> On 21.12.2013 20:40, David Highley wrote:
> We upgraded a test system to Fedora 20 using the fedup process. There
> were 60 packages
On Dec 22, 2013, at 8:30 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Trying to upgrade F19-F20 using fedup --iso with luks-encrypted partitions.
I suggest posting the results of lsblk.
Chris Murphy
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://ad
On 12/22/2013 6:07 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 12/23/13 06:40, David wrote:
>> You guys are making this much, much more difficult than it is.
>
> Not really.
>
> The OP is using VBox from the Oracle site on F19 and is wanting to run F20 in
> a VM and he can't get it to install. Others, including
On 12/22/2013 9:01 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 12/23/13 09:57, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> The last significant post from the OP would indicate he has it running under
>> virt-manager and is not concentrating on trying to find a method to convert
>> VBox VM's to run under virt-manager
>
> Should read...
On 12/23/13 09:57, Ed Greshko wrote:
> The last significant post from the OP would indicate he has it running under
> virt-manager and is not concentrating on trying to find a method to convert
> VBox VM's to run under virt-manager
Should read
The last significant post from the OP would ind
On 12/23/13 07:58, David wrote:
> On 12/22/2013 6:07 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 12/23/13 06:40, David wrote:
>>> You guys are making this much, much more difficult than it is.
>> Not really.
>>
>> The OP is using VBox from the Oracle site on F19 and is wanting to run F20
>> in a VM and he can't g
On 12-22-13 18:24:25 John Aldrich wrote:
> Can I just do a "yum remove *.fc18.*" to remove those packages since
> I should have the F20 versions now?
You want to run
package-cleanup --dupes
This will print the F18 packages that also have F20 installed. Erase
only those (which could easily b
On 12/22/2013 6:07 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 12/23/13 06:40, David wrote:
>> You guys are making this much, much more difficult than it is.
>
> Not really.
>
> The OP is using VBox from the Oracle site on F19 and is wanting to run F20 in
> a VM and he can't get it to install. Others, including
Trying again...
I used FedUp to upgrade to F20 from F18, however the first time I tried, I
switched the display (I'm on a KVM switch) to another computer and when I
switched back it looked like the display had not updated and that FedUp was
hung, so I rebooted, cleaned everything out and tried
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 18:24:25 -0500
John Aldrich wrote:
> Can I just do a "yum remove *.fc18.*" to remove those packages since
> I should have the F20 versions now?
I'd advise against blindly doing so.
First, try a 'yum distro-sync'. This will make sure you have the newest
versions of those pack
Can I just do a "yum remove *.fc18.*" to remove those packages since I should
have the F20 versions now?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedorap
On 12/23/13 06:40, David wrote:
> You guys are making this much, much more difficult than it is.
Not really.
The OP is using VBox from the Oracle site on F19 and is wanting to run F20 in a
VM and he can't get it to install. Others, including myself, have had no
problems. So.trying to help
On 22.12.2013 22:49, David Highley wrote:
> "David Highley wrote:"
>>
>> "Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:"
>>>
>>> On 21.12.2013 20:40, David Highley wrote:
We upgraded a test system to Fedora 20 using the fedup process. There
were 60 packages that were left from Fedora 19 after the upgrade t
On 22.12.2013 23:54, John Aldrich wrote:
> And now running "yum distro-sync" results in the system trying to roll back
> everything. When I look in YUMEX it shows all the repos as F18, not F20. How
> do I fix that???
>
Please use fedup for upgrading from f18 to f20.
[1] https://fedoraproject.o
And now running "yum distro-sync" results in the system trying to roll back
everything. When I look in YUMEX it shows all the repos as F18, not F20. How
do I fix that???
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject
On 12/22/2013 5:27 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 12/22/13 22:53, Greg Woods wrote:
>> The RPM I have installed is VirtualBox-4.3-4.3.6_91406_fedora18-1.x86_64
>> (they don't seem to have one for Fedora 19).
>
> Yes, but the download is labeled for "Fedora 18 ("Spherical Cow") / 19
> ("Schrödingers C
hi guys.
question regarding how to remotely auto boot/install into a system..
normal operation:
-1 drive/1 OS
machine gets turned on, boots/starts the OS
but if I want to do a remote/auto/programtic install of a new OS, on
top of the current OS, how the heck can this be accomplished.
I was init
On 12/22/13 22:53, Greg Woods wrote:
> The RPM I have installed is VirtualBox-4.3-4.3.6_91406_fedora18-1.x86_64
> (they don't seem to have one for Fedora 19).
Yes, but the download is labeled for "Fedora 18 ("Spherical Cow") / 19
("Schrödingers Cat")"
--
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 22:47:05 +0100 Michael Schwendt
wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:26:32 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > I removed the new kernel, updated grub2-mkconfig and rebooted into the
> > old kernel. Does this not bring it back to the old setup (before
> > installation of the new kern
"David Highley wrote:"
>
> "Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:"
> >
> > On 21.12.2013 20:40, David Highley wrote:
> > > We upgraded a test system to Fedora 20 using the fedup process. There
> > > were 60 packages that were left from Fedora 19 after the upgrade that
> > > were subsequently fixed by doing
bruce writes:
> However you can also mod the ssh_config (i believe) to have it auto
> use the keyFile with the pub/private key to negotiate the user/passwd
> process for the ssh cmd. This is useful when remotely/programatically
> accessing the ssh cmdline process for running remote apps, xferring
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:26:32 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> I removed the new kernel, updated grub2-mkconfig and rebooted into the
> old kernel. Does this not bring it back to the old setup (before
> installation of the new kernel). Or if your question was if the problem
> is reproducible in the se
Thanks!
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 21:08:05 +0100 Michael Schwendt
wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 14:03:08 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > OK, I have downdated the kernel, run grub2-mkconfig so we should be
> > back on the same plane as before.
>
> "Should be"? Do you mean the problem is reproducible
On 12/22/2013 03:15 PM, "Germán A. Racca" wrote:
On 12/22/2013 05:08 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/20/2013 10:28 PM, "Germán A. Racca" wrote:
On 12/20/2013 05:07 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/20/2013 02:47 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 13:46 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wr
On 12/20/2013 10:32 PM, "Germán A. Racca" wrote:
On 12/20/2013 05:09 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/20/2013 01:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On f17 I can move a window or dialog box by holding down and
and moving the window where I want. This is very
valuable on reduced screen devices
On 12/22/2013 05:08 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/20/2013 10:28 PM, "Germán A. Racca" wrote:
On 12/20/2013 05:07 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/20/2013 02:47 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 13:46 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
How do I get these available somewhere? I wo
On 12/20/2013 10:28 PM, "Germán A. Racca" wrote:
On 12/20/2013 05:07 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/20/2013 02:47 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 13:46 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
How do I get these available somewhere? I would assume on that top
bar
pulldown that has pow
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 14:03:08 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> OK, I have downdated the kernel, run grub2-mkconfig so we should be
> back on the same plane as before.
"Should be"? Do you mean the problem is reproducible after simple
downgrade of the kernel package?
> An important thing to note is th
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 20:14:27 +0100 Michael Schwendt
wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 08:54:54 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I updated using yum last night and while the new 3.12.5 kernel was
> > installed, it does not show up on grub. So, I did the following:
> >
> > sudo grub2-mkc
On 12/20/2013 03:58 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 15:07 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
gnome-tweak-tool you can select Shell Extensions, then turn on
"Alternate Status Menu".
I don't see Shell Extensions. Only Extensions. There is an 'Install
Shell Extension' option there, but
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 08:54:54 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I updated using yum last night and while the new 3.12.5 kernel was
> installed, it does not show up on grub. So, I did the following:
>
> sudo grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
> Generating grub.cfg ...
> Found linux image:
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Trying to upgrade F19-F20 using fedup --iso with luks-encrypted partitions.
The upgrade stops after "Mounted /boot", and does not proceed, no further
errors. Nothing appears to be running.
I did run into bug 1043981, and applied the patch to fix fedup barfing.
… aa
Wolfgang,
Right in what you wrote. And what you wrote allows for ssh commands to
be used where you specify the keyFile.
However you can also mod the ssh_config (i believe) to have it auto
use the keyFile with the pub/private key to negotiate the user/passwd
process for the ssh cmd. This is useful
Trying to upgrade F19-F20 using fedup --iso with luks-encrypted partitions.
The upgrade stops after "Mounted /boot", and does not proceed, no further
errors. Nothing appears to be running.
I did run into bug 1043981, and applied the patch to fix fedup barfing.
pgpug_17KnCEH.pgp
Description
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 09:55:20 -0500
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I have selinux turned off, I don't need it. The update script is
> turning it on, and relabeling everything. I'm just going to turn it
> off again, when the update finishes.
>
> Is there any way to avoid wasting all this time.
The relab
With all the NSA building in back doors into everything maybe SElinux
should be pulled from the Fedora distros permanently. Just a thought.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Sam Varshavchik
wrote:
After I started a fedup update to F20, it burned up a lot of time
relabeling the entire filesy
If you want if off temporarily, till the next reboot or till you turn
it on, this:
sudo setenforce 0
should also work, correct?
1 in place of 0 switches it back on, no?
Unless I am not understanding the question.
Many thanks,
Ranjan
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 09:01:50 -0600 Roger
Heflin wrote:
> a
add selinux=0 on all of the kernel lines in grub.conf...I believe this
disables it completely...and cannot be turned back on without removing
that line and rebooting...obviously if you want to enable it and got
back and use it again relabeling would need to be done.
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 8:55 AM
Hi,
I updated using yum last night and while the new 3.12.5 kernel was
installed, it does not show up on grub. So, I did the following:
sudo grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
Generating grub.cfg ...
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64
Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3
After I started a fedup update to F20, it burned up a lot of time relabeling
the entire filesystem, then rebooted again. On the second reboot there were
a couple of "failed to mount update media" errors; however it looks like the
update rpm transaction is running. We'll see.
I have selinux
On Sat, 2013-12-21 at 22:41 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
> > Something may be more fundamentally wrong than I thought. I don't see
> > "64 bit" as a choice anywhere in Vbox Manager.
> Which repo is your virtualbox from?
I'm not using a repo for it, I just downloaded it from the
virtualbox.org web
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 08:39:47 -0500, John Aldrich wrote:
> I use KMOD-NVIDIA on my system, and I ran FEDUP to upgrade to F20 overnight
> and when I came to my computer this morning, there were several warnings:
> WARNING: problems were encountered during transaction test:
> broken dependencies
>
On Sat, 2013-12-21 at 17:14 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>
> > And what about our certificates? Are they more or less useless now?
>
> There are no vulnerabilities related to X.509 certificates generated
> by OpenSSL (on Fedora or otherwise) that I am aware of.
The big vulnerability in the
On 12/22/13 21:39, John Aldrich wrote:
> I use KMOD-NVIDIA on my system, and I ran FEDUP to upgrade to F20 overnight
> and when I came to my computer this morning, there were several warnings:
> WARNING: problems were encountered during transaction test:
> broken dependencies
> kmod-nvidia-3
I use KMOD-NVIDIA on my system, and I ran FEDUP to upgrade to F20 overnight
and when I came to my computer this morning, there were several warnings:
WARNING: problems were encountered during transaction test:
broken dependencies
kmod-nvidia-304xx-3.11.7-100.fc18.x86_64-304.88-4.fc18.x86_64
bruce writes:
> And regarding the ssh/remote access, you specify public/private keys,
> and you have the key process run from the key file. This allows a user
> to be able to ssh into the box without having to use the ssh passwd,
> but only from the corresponding box that has the associated public
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:36:26 -0500, bruce wrote:
> For sake of discussion, assume a fresh base desktop install of the OS
> (Fed/RHEL/Centos).
>
> After doing the install from the iso(s), you install :
> -rkhunter
> -chkconfig
Did you mean "chkrootkit"? If so, it's only for experienced users (who
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 2:12 AM, bruce wrote:
> since this has been hijacked to be a thread regarding passwds..
>
> why don't you relabel the topic...
>
Maybe, if it goes on much longer. However I would hardly call this
hijacking. It has drifted a little from the original topic, but hijacking
i
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-12-21 at 10:22 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > Keepass and friends are worthy alternatives, but AFAIK they aren't
> > usable from phones.
>
> I use Keepassdroid on an Android phone and it works just fine. It's a
> bit clunk
On 22.12.2013, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Is there no loop device in the new 3.12.5 kernel by
> default?
In 3.12.6 vanilla, it definitely is.
[htd@kiera ~]$ uname -a
Linux kiera.fritha.org 3.12.6-rc1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Dec 19 16:55:38 CET 2013
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
users mailing list
55 matches
Mail list logo
