On 11/27/2013 10:15 PM, David wrote:
On 11/27/2013 9:54 PM, g wrote:
<<>>
so just what do you have selected under;
View > Sort by and View > Threads ?
You are searching for errors?
no.
Perhaps I said that incorrectly. AP's
messages, and those of everyone that I have seen that have rep
On 11/27/2013 11:01 PM, poma wrote:
<>
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2013/11/msg01470.html
This dude is obviously a spammer, and for you dgboles it seems to
> be a rather enjoyable.
Good to know.
i believe i would call him a 'troller' more so than a 'spammer'.
any one interested, ha
On 11/28/2013 12:24 AM, poma wrote:
> On 28.11.2013 06:06, David wrote:
>> On 11/28/2013 12:01 AM, poma wrote:
>>> On 28.11.2013 03:02, David wrote:
>>>
As I said... Me - The ordinary user that uses an Email Client has no
problems with what AP and Gmail is/are doing. His posts, for me fal
On 28.11.2013 06:06, David wrote:
> On 11/28/2013 12:01 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 28.11.2013 03:02, David wrote:
>>
>>> As I said... Me - The ordinary user that uses an Email Client has no
>>> problems with what AP and Gmail is/are doing. His posts, for me fall in
>>> the proper place in the thread(s)
On 11/28/2013 12:01 AM, poma wrote:
> On 28.11.2013 03:02, David wrote:
>
>> As I said... Me - The ordinary user that uses an Email Client has no
>> problems with what AP and Gmail is/are doing. His posts, for me fall in
>> the proper place in the thread(s) on this list.
>>
>> So that means?? Mayb
On 28.11.2013 03:02, David wrote:
> As I said... Me - The ordinary user that uses an Email Client has no
> problems with what AP and Gmail is/are doing. His posts, for me fall in
> the proper place in the thread(s) on this list.
>
> So that means?? Maybe you 'Linux geeks' with your 'fancy Linux G
On 11/27/2013 07:17 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 11/27/2013 03:29 PM, poma issued this missive:
>> On 27.11.2013 23:32, Max Pyziur wrote:
>>>
>>> UTF-8 enabled enscript - looking for a way to print UTF-8 text from CLI?
>>
>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/pst/enscript.html
>
> Speci
On 11/27/2013 9:54 PM, g wrote:
>
>
> On 11/27/2013 08:02 PM, David wrote:
> <>
>
>> As I said... Me - The ordinary user that uses an Email Client has
>> no problems with what AP and Gmail is/are doing. His posts, for
>> me fall in the proper place in the thread(s) on this list.
>
> and you use
On 11/27/2013 08:02 PM, David wrote:
<>
As I said... Me - The ordinary user that uses an Email Client has
> no problems with what AP and Gmail is/are doing. His posts, for
> me fall in the proper place in the thread(s) on this list.
and you use "thread(s)", indicating possible plural?
so ju
I haven't been following this discussion thread closely of late but
would like to understand how and what emails, clients, headers, gmail
and faults or not with browsers has to do with "Why some say "rpm
hell". I seem to have missed a step.
Was the rpm issue resolved or explained. Isn't rpm a
On 11/27/2013 5:30 PM, g wrote:
>
>
> On 11/27/2013 12:53 PM, David wrote:
> <>
>
>
>> I don't see any problems with your emails AP. I see the headers and
>> they follow the thread, for me, in Thunderbird. No matter which
>> browser you use.
>
> *NOT*
>
> if you look again, you will not see h
On 11/27/2013 06:20 PM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 27 November 2013, Ian Malone sent:
I'm wondering though if it's related to the fact your posts are
base64 encoded.
The method of encoding the message body really shouldn't affect
headers.
actually, the base64 is done by the "lists.f
On 11/27/2013 06:20 PM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 27 November 2013, g sent:
it is not a fault of browser, it is a fault with gmail when using
web browser to reply to threaded post.
Yet, when I do that with gmail (reply to a message through the web
interface), it works with proper hea
On 11/27/2013 06:20 PM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 27 November 2013, AP sent:
Well, I am replying from Opera browser right now.
And the headers are still missing.
What happens if you don't block scripting while you're doing this?
Enable it before you hit reply, type your reply, then
Allegedly, on or about 27 November 2013, Ian Malone sent:
> I'm wondering though if it's related to the fact your posts are
> base64 encoded.
The method of encoding the message body really shouldn't affect headers.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.8.13-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon May 13
Allegedly, on or about 27 November 2013, g sent:
> it is not a fault of browser, it is a fault with gmail when using
> web browser to reply to threaded post.
Yet, when I do that with gmail (reply to a message through the web
interface), it works with proper headers.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname
Allegedly, on or about 27 November 2013, AP sent:
> Well, I am replying from Opera browser right now.
And the headers are still missing.
What happens if you don't block scripting while you're doing this?
Enable it before you hit reply, type your reply, then send it.
My thinking reckons that if i
On 11/27/2013 03:29 PM, poma issued this missive:
On 27.11.2013 23:32, Max Pyziur wrote:
UTF-8 enabled enscript - looking for a way to print UTF-8 text from CLI?
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/pst/enscript.html
Specifically, enscript can't do UTF-8 encodings. Use paps instead
On 28.11.2013 00:47, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/28/13 07:36, Richard Vickery wrote:
>> Being on the test kernel - or, more likely, using a more stable one from the
>> list that is compiled - is probably the answer to the issue: how am I to
>> watch a VOB file?
>>
>> Linux 3.11.9-300.fc20.x86_64 #1
On 11/28/13 07:36, Richard Vickery wrote:
> Being on the test kernel - or, more likely, using a more stable one from the
> list that is compiled - is probably the answer to the issue: how am I to
> watch a VOB file?
>
> Linux 3.11.9-300.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Nov 20 22:23:25 UTC 2013 x86_64
>
>
Being on the test kernel - or, more likely, using a more stable one from
the list that is compiled - is probably the answer to the issue: how am I
to watch a VOB file?
Linux 3.11.9-300.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Nov 20 22:23:25 UTC 2013 x86_64
Thanks
--
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedo
On 27.11.2013 23:32, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
> UTF-8 enabled enscript - looking for a way to print UTF-8 text from CLI?
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/pst/enscript.html
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://
On 27 November 2013 19:01, AP wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:23 AM, David wrote:
>
>> Frankly I find it hard to comprehend just how the browser and any of
>> it's settings, would have any interaction with an email written on the
>> Gmail Web interface, or any email interface.
>
> I wonder to
On 27.11.2013 21:15, GervanDijck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an Dell Inspiron 17 R with a card Radeon 8730M .
>
> Is there a way to configure this hardware with driver software so it
> functionates on a proper way and does not come in the fall back mode ?
$ uname -r
$ su -c "lspci -nnv | grep VGA
UTF-8 enabled enscript - looking for a way to print UTF-8 text from CLI?
Whenever I to use enscript to print a text file with characters out of
base ASCII range, the results are garbled. gedit works well, but I'm
looking for something like enscript where you can control things quickly:
rotat
On 11/27/2013 12:53 PM, David wrote:
<>
I don't see any problems with your emails AP. I see the headers and
they follow the thread, for me, in Thunderbird. No matter which
browser you use.
*NOT*
if you look again, you will not see headers;
In-Reply-To:
or
References:
Frankly I fi
On Nov 27, 2013, at 1:58 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> It can't be used if /boot is on XFS or LVM or md RAID, all of which lack
>> boot loader padding areas, so fewer configurations are supported.
>>
>
> Okay. I don't want to put separate /boot partitions on XFS, LVM or RAID.
> Certainly no
On 11/27/2013 01:38 PM, Beartooth wrote:
Could these things be case-sensitive??
Why not? Everything else in Linux is.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of
On Nov 26, 2013, at 10:17 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 11/27/2013 04:24 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 26, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/26/2013 11:56 PM, poma wrote:
On 26.11.2013 23:18, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> That's because your setup is wron
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 13:08:11 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
> The default browser *on the computer running the program* is the one
> that gets opened. Unless you can change the default on the remote host,
> Alpine's behavior won't change.
Much as I wish, that can't be right: Alpine on the remote
Hi,
I have an Dell Inspiron 17 R with a card Radeon 8730M .
Is there a way to configure this hardware with driver software so it
functionates on a proper way and does not come in the fall back mode ?
Help woulde be usefull .
Kind regards ,
Ger van Dijck.
--
Using Opera's mail client: http
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:23 AM, David wrote:
> Frankly I find it hard to comprehend just how the browser and any of
> it's settings, would have any interaction with an email written on the
> Gmail Web interface, or any email interface.
I wonder to think this but I never earlier noted all this
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:23 AM, David wrote:
> https://www.box.com/shared/78msc32ktf0k6oed51wq
Almost everything is technical
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Co
On 11/27/2013 11:59 AM, AP wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Tim wrote:
>
>> It's still missing the headers. Give the other browser a try, and we'll
>> see if that change things. Likewise, you could try changing some of the
>> privacy settings.
>
> Well, I am replying from Opera brows
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
> I think this is the right attitude, adblock, noscript etc. are things
> you use to protect you online, not for protection of your emails. E.g.
> it's your gmail account rather than the emails you're sending with it
> that you are trying to pro
On 27 November 2013 16:59, AP wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Tim wrote:
>
>> It's still missing the headers. Give the other browser a try, and we'll
>> see if that change things. Likewise, you could try changing some of the
>> privacy settings.
>
> Well, I am replying from Opera bro
On 27 November 2013 12:18, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
> but is wrong with evince.
> The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong character for me
> is \Phi.
>
> Would you know what is wrong?
Do you've a screenshoot of what shoul
On 11/27/2013 03:45 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 18:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:18:37 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
but is wrong with evince.
The correct character is a \D
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 18:20:35 +0100, poma wrote:
> On 27.11.2013 18:12, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > It's a delta symbol here.
> >
> > $ rpm -q evince
> > evince-3.10.3-1.fc20.x86_64
>
> U2 should know better after years of use.
> F20 ain't an official, so
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 17:20 +0100, lee wrote:
> poma writes:
>
> > On 26.11.2013 21:04, lee wrote:
> >
> >> Since the device in question supports TWAIN and TWAIN, iirc, was
> >> supposed to be some sort of standard for scanners, isn't there some
> >> software, like sane, that supports scanning ov
On 27.11.2013 18:45, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> FWIW, on Fedora 19+updates, it's a phi symbol. I'm running the standard
> Gnome 3 desktop.
>
> $ rpm -q evince
> evince-3.8.3-2.fc19.x86_64
Here's become rare to see f19.
You're the man!
LoL!
Bee awesome.:!
poma
--
users mailing list
users@list
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 18:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:18:37 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
> > but is wrong with evince.
> > The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong charact
On 27.11.2013 18:38, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> The document shows up correctly for me, in both evince and okular.
>
Can we finally agree on anything!?
LoL!
Bee awesome.:!
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorap
On 27.11.2013, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
> but is wrong with evince.
> The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong character for me
> is \Phi.
The document shows up correctly for me, in both evince and okular.
--
users maili
On 27.11.2013 18:19, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> OK, in fedora 18, it is
> evince-3.6.1-2.fc18.x86_64.
> Is it the reason?
Now you're breaking a thread, too.
LoL!
Bee awesome.:!
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.
On 27.11.2013 18:12, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> It's a delta symbol here.
>
> $ rpm -q evince
> evince-3.10.3-1.fc20.x86_64
U2 should know better after years of use.
F20 ain't an official, so
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fed
> - Original Message -
> From: Michael Schwendt
> Sent: 11/27/13 06:12 PM
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: evince
>
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:18:37 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
> >
>
> What are you. Asking.. I am not getting
Should I set up something to have the correct viewing?
I cannot use it with "wrong" character while I think that
evince would be helpfull for some purpose.
In one word I would like to use evince, but because the
displaying is wrong, I just cannot use
On 27.11.2013 16:58, Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
> Hello folks, I've gotten Fedora 19, and I love what I've
> experienced thus far. I have two important questions about
> post-installation: will Orca start up after I reboot the system,
> and does Fedora 19 use Gnome 3.10?
Bummer, doesn't work with t
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:18:37 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
> but is wrong with evince.
> The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong character for me
> is \Phi.
>
> Would you know what is wrong?
It's a delta sym
On 27.11.2013 17:59, AP wrote:
> Well, I am replying from Opera browser right now.
LoL!
Bee awesome.:!
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http:
On 27.11.2013 17:20, lee wrote:
> The documentation there assumes that the scanner is connected to a
> computer through USB, SCSI or a parallel port, which is *not* the case.
>
I agree with you *if* that *is* the case, I mean *if* it is *not* the case.
Period
poma
--
users mailing list
user
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Tim wrote:
> It's still missing the headers. Give the other browser a try, and we'll
> see if that change things. Likewise, you could try changing some of the
> privacy settings.
Well, I am replying from Opera browser right now.
> There's little point in tryi
Doug writes:
> On 11/26/2013 03:04 PM, lee wrote:
>> Mateusz Marzantowicz writes:
>>
>>> On 23.11.2013 20:04, lee wrote:
Hi,
how would I go about accessing a scanning device that is connected via
network?
>>>
> /snip/
>
>> Since the device in question supports TWAIN and
poma writes:
> On 26.11.2013 21:04, lee wrote:
>
>> Since the device in question supports TWAIN and TWAIN, iirc, was
>> supposed to be some sort of standard for scanners, isn't there some
>> software, like sane, that supports scanning over the network?
>
> http://sane-project.meier-geinitz.de/
T
What are you. Asking.. I am not getting
-Original Message-
From: "Patrick Dupre"
Sent: 27-11-2013 08:48 PM
To: "fedora"
Subject: evince
Hello,
The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
but is wrong with evince.
The correct character is a \Delta with the wr
On 27.11.2013 16:18, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
> but is wrong with evince.
> The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong character for me
> is \Phi.
>
> Would you know what is wrong?
https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evin
Hello folks, I've gotten Fedora 19, and I love what I've
experienced thus far. I have two important questions about
post-installation: will Orca start up after I reboot the system,
and does Fedora 19 use Gnome 3.10?
Thanks,
Hunter
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
Hello,
The viewing ot the attached file is correct with xpsd and acroread,
but is wrong with evince.
The correct character is a \Delta with the wrong character for me
is \Phi.
Would you know what is wrong?
Thank.
===
Patri
David:
>> Congratulations! You went from a reasonably safe Firefox feature to a
>> known buggy and security unsecured Adobe Reader.
>>
>> Google search for "Adobe Reader Security Breach".
Doug:
> Probably the reason that Adobe won't make anything more for Linux is
> that so many people like this
On 11/27/2013 12:58 AM, Dan Thurman wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 07:13 PM, David wrote:
> Why is the latest foxit release FC-9?
>
I don't know but I would think a licensing problem would be a good guess.
I use the Firefox built in feature myself. I only offered Foxit Reader
as an option since the OP
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Javier Perez wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
>> On Nov 26, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Javier Perez wrote:
>>
>> In theory, Ubuntu and Fedora will have their own partitions inside the
>> SDD.
>>
>> My question is, can I share the /boot parti
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Javier Perez wrote:
>
> For some reason, Fedora seems to find the kernels of the Ubuntu partitions
> each time I update the Fedora Kernel. I do not have them explicitly mounted
> as far as I remember. I'd have to check next time I boot in Fedora. Probably
> they ar
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Richard Sewill wrote:
>
> I hesitate trying to answer this question because what I am doing may be
> wrong.
>
> I tried the following on F18.
>
> I edited the line, found in file /etc/default/grub, which starts
> GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rd.md=0 ... rhgb quiet"
> append
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> Frank Murphy wrote:
>> On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 12:37:03 +0100
>> Patrick Lists wrote:
>>>
>>> I meant the transmission of the log to another log server. Not the
>>> log itself. Anyway, here is Lennart Poettering's rationale behind
>>> journ
On 11/27/2013 08:10 PM, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
2013-11-22 22:16 keltezéssel, Joe Zeff írta:
On 11/22/2013 12:54 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
Why can't computer geeks learn to write English correctly?
What I'd like to know is where is Henry Higgins when we need him?
You must have meant 'enry 'i
On 11/27/2013 09:56 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:02:33 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 11/26/2013 02:00 PM, Javier Perez wrote:
For some reason, Ubuntu does not find out Fedora unless I mount the disk
each time I update ubuntu kernel.
How do you expect Ubuntu to find a kernel
2013-11-22 22:16 keltezéssel, Joe Zeff írta:
On 11/22/2013 12:54 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
Why can't computer geeks learn to write English correctly?
What I'd like to know is where is Henry Higgins when we need him?
You must have meant 'enry 'iggins... ;-)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fed
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:24:32 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Well it's not a good recommendation to do what is explicitly not recommended
> by GRUB devs. grub-install spits out a warning if you try to do this, by the
> way. It requires the user pass --force for it to work.
>
No problem. So far I c
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:02:33 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 02:00 PM, Javier Perez wrote:
> > For some reason, Ubuntu does not find out Fedora unless I mount the disk
> > each time I update ubuntu kernel.
>
> How do you expect Ubuntu to find a kernel on an unmounted partition?
You may be
70 matches
Mail list logo
