Tim:
>> I *keep* on using *what* word?
Reindl Harald:
> the word "clearly"?
I disagree. I've only participated in this thread about three or four
times, by now. That's hardly cause for saying I "keep on" saying
anything. Nor do I insist that something is clear in other threads.
The other poste
On 15 Oct 2013 at 17:04, Beartooth wrote:
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Beartooth
Subject: F19 --> F18 feasible?
Date sent: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:04:26 + (UTC)
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
>
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:28:49 +1300 Rolf Turner
wrote:
> On 10/16/13 09:20, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > On 10/15/2013 01:07 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
> >> Please, people: When you give advice, make sure you get the little
> >> details right.
> >> Knowledgeable types and gurus can readily spot and fix minor
On 10/16/13 09:20, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 10/15/2013 01:07 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
Please, people: When you give advice, make sure you get the little
details right.
Knowledgeable types and gurus can readily spot and fix minor
infelicities. But to us
bunnies a minor infelicity can be completely bewi
On 10/15/2013 01:07 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
Please, people: When you give advice, make sure you get the little
details right.
Knowledgeable types and gurus can readily spot and fix minor
infelicities. But to us
bunnies a minor infelicity can be completely bewildering. Test your
code before
send
On 10/16/13 05:37, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
OK, you are missing some packages (not from R):
sudo yum provides */libpng-config
yields:
2:libpng-devel-1.5.13-2.fc19.i686 : Development tools for programs to
manipulate : PNG image format files
Repo: fedora
Matched from:
Filename: /usr/bin/
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:51:53PM +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> The bug was just closed as NOTABUG with the comment "Get the gnome devs to
> blacklist it." Since you obviously understand this stuff much better than
> me, does that sound like a reasonable response?
To explain this in a bit more d
Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
> Olav Vitters vitters.nl> writes:
>
> > Cinnamon bug. It seems cinnamon-screensaver was forked from
> > gnome-screensaver, but they didn't adjust the autostart file. So
> > currently it is configured to start under GNOME and Unity. Breaking
> > things
My old Thinkpad T30 (on which I ran fedup from F18 to F19) is
beginning to seem like more effort than it's worth, ever if eventual
success of the effort were a sure thing. Is there a FedDown lurking out
there somewhere?
Will an install DVD for F18 (preferably one with both gno
OK, you are missing some packages (not from R):
sudo yum provides */libpng-config
yields:
2:libpng-devel-1.5.13-2.fc19.i686 : Development tools for programs to
manipulate : PNG image format files
Repo: fedora
Matched from:
Filename: /usr/bin/libpng-config
So install:
sudo yum inst
Looks to me like you're missing the development headers for libpng.
- Original Message -
| I know they're useless, but the professor used them and, having known
| how to do things without then before class, I have since forgotten
| how
| to get by without them; and under the pressures of t
I know they're useless, but the professor used them and, having known
how to do things without then before class, I have since forgotten how
to get by without them; and under the pressures of the current
classes, it would be far easier using them until the Winter break.
Here's what I get when I go
Olav Vitters vitters.nl> writes:
> Cinnamon bug. It seems cinnamon-screensaver was forked from
> gnome-screensaver, but they didn't adjust the autostart file. So
> currently it is configured to start under GNOME and Unity. Breaking
> things under GNOME.
>
> Please file a bug. Note: the bug is in
On Sat, 12 Oct 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.10.2013 08:54, schrieb Tim:
Tim:
That part of their message was *CLEARLY* humorous.>
Stephen Gallagher
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it
means.
I *keep* on using *what* word?
the word "clearly"?
where do y
W dniu 2013-10-15 15:24, Rich Megginson pisze:
A given solution in this case it does not help, i made (again)
initialization and the effect is exactly the same. What else can be
wrong?
You initialized the server "slave port 389" from the server "master
port 389" and you still get "Replica h
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 03:09:32PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> Please file a bug. Note: the bug is in Cinnamon, because I see the same
> in Mageia.
Checking more, it seems that almost all of the Cinnamon 2.0 packages
have similar bugs. Causing Cinnamon bits to start under GNOME. Plus
Cinnamon spe
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:25:13AM +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Thanks for this, I'll try it next time it happens, and file a bug if it
> works. (BTW, I don't always have the problem - the last time I was locked
> out, I was able to enter password.) I currently have
> cinnamon-screensaver-2.0.0-1
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 01:22:16PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when I do man exp10, it appears that this function should be in the math
> library.
You are clearly missing the
#define _GNU_SOURCE /* See feature_test_macros(7) */
#include
at the beginning of the
zaptac ponschab.de> writes:
> Same here.
>
> If you're locked out: Change to a virtual terminal (ctrl f2), login
> there and run "killall cinnamon-screensaver".
Thanks for this, I'll try it next time it happens, and file a bug if it
works. (BTW, I don't always have the problem - the last time
Hello,
when I do man exp10, it appears that this function should be in the math
library.
However, when I look inside /usr/include/math.h, there is no function like
exp10!
Where is the declaration of this function?
Wihtout, I get:
error: implicit declaration of function ‘exp10’
[-Werror=implici
On 10/15/2013 12:58 PM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 12:52 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> No update for cups-filters-libs-1.0.38-2.fc19.x86_64 and
>> cups-filters-1.0.38-2.fc19.x86_64
>>
>>
>> *Result: Document is still printed well!*
> [...]
>> 2. Trying to update cups-filters* from u
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 12:52 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> No update for cups-filters-libs-1.0.38-2.fc19.x86_64 and
> cups-filters-1.0.38-2.fc19.x86_64
>
>
> *Result: Document is still printed well!*
[...]
> 2. Trying to update cups-filters* from updates-testing repo:
> --
On 10/15/2013 12:42 PM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 12:24 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> *Now, the document is printed well!*
>
> Great! Now it should be possible to upgrade each of those (ghostscript,
> cups-filters, and cups) one by one to see what makes the difference.
>
> Tim.
>
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 12:24 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> *Now, the document is printed well!*
Great! Now it should be possible to upgrade each of those (ghostscript,
cups-filters, and cups) one by one to see what makes the difference.
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally si
On 10/15/2013 11:47 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 10:36 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> having a problem since having updated to
>>
>> cups.x86_64 1:1.6.4-2.fc19
>> cups-filters.x86_64 0:1.0.38-2.fc19
>> cups-filters-libs.x86_64 0:1.0.38-2.fc19
>> cups-devel.x86_64 1:1.6.4-2.fc19
>>
Am 15.10.2013 12:17, schrieb Joachim Backes:
On 10/15/2013 11:21 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
Joachim Backes rhrk.uni-kl.de> writes:
I had this problem after having updated the cinnamon pkgs, though I see
no releationship.
I currently have 5 DEs installed (GNOME/KDE/MATE/Cinnamon/Basic), but w
On 10/15/2013 11:21 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Joachim Backes rhrk.uni-kl.de> writes:
>
>> I had this problem after having updated the cinnamon pkgs, though I see
>> no releationship.
>
> I currently have 5 DEs installed (GNOME/KDE/MATE/Cinnamon/Basic), but was
> using GNOME at the time.
>
>
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 10:36 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> having a problem since having updated to
>
> cups.x86_64 1:1.6.4-2.fc19
> cups-filters.x86_64 0:1.0.38-2.fc19
> cups-filters-libs.x86_64 0:1.0.38-2.fc19
> cups-devel.x86_64 1:1.6.4-2.fc19
> cups-filesystem.noarch 1:1.6.4-2.fc19
> cups-libs
On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 13:01 -0700, Jack Craig wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Rick Stevens
> wrote:
> On 10/14/2013 12:16 PM, Carlos "casep" Sepulveda issued this
> missive:
>
> On 14 October 2013 16:07, Jack Craig
> wro
Joachim Backes rhrk.uni-kl.de> writes:
> I had this problem after having updated the cinnamon pkgs, though I see
> no releationship.
I currently have 5 DEs installed (GNOME/KDE/MATE/Cinnamon/Basic), but was
using GNOME at the time.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
On 10/15/2013 11:03 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
>
>> Has anyone else noticed that in F19 GNOME, even with Screen Lock turned off,
>> lately the screen will lock anyway? Is there an existing bug, and if not,
>> which component should it be filed under?
>
Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
> Has anyone else noticed that in F19 GNOME, even with Screen Lock turned off,
> lately the screen will lock anyway? Is there an existing bug, and if not,
> which component should it be filed under?
The problem is worse than I thought. My screen just loc
Hi all,
having a problem since having updated to
cups.x86_64 1:1.6.4-2.fc19
cups-filters.x86_64 0:1.0.38-2.fc19
cups-filters-libs.x86_64 0:1.0.38-2.fc19
cups-devel.x86_64 1:1.6.4-2.fc19
cups-filesystem.noarch 1:1.6.4-2.fc19
cups-libs.i686 1:1.6.4-2.fc19
cups-libs.x86_64 1:1.6.4-2.fc19
I use some
Has anyone else noticed that in F19 GNOME, even with Screen Lock turned off,
lately the screen will lock anyway? Is there an existing bug, and if not,
which component should it be filed under?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https
34 matches
Mail list logo
