Allegedly, on or about 19 September 2013, Mark Haney sent:
> Does this trigger a thought with anyone on what the problem could be?
"failed... queued... timed out..." sounds like hardware trouble... But
it would have been better if you'd not edited the log.
> I know the drive is good since I can
Hi,
My first tests using virsh from
http://teuf.fedorapeople.org/virt-viewer-msi/ were based on the 64-bit
(x86_64) binaries. I'll try the 32-bit binaries and report on the
results.
The 32-bit binaries needed the same DLLs (of course the 32-bit ones) and
gave the same results: virsh works with
Hi Marc,
C:\Program Files\VirtViewer\bin>virsh -c qemu+tcp://kvmhost/system
error: failed to connect to the hypervisor
error: authentication failed: unsupported authentication type 1
It looks like the windows port can't do SASL auth over TCP. So I changed
libvirtd.conf to allow unauthenticated c
Hi,
My first tests using virsh from
http://teuf.fedorapeople.org/virt-viewer-msi/ were based on the 64-bit
(x86_64) binaries. I'll try the 32-bit binaries and report on the results.
After having success with a few comands using virsh, I decided to try
virt-viewer.
It reported missing libss
Hi Christophe,
If someone provides newer windows binaries -- which aren't missing
dlls, like the ones at http://teuf.fedorapeople.org/virt-viewer-msi/
-- I will test then.
I gave you links to RPMs containing the missing dlls (rpm2cpio foo.dll
| cpio -id will unpack them on linux) in
https://ww
I hate top posting, but I have more information that Ihope might help. I tried
the steps in:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2#Encountering_the_dreaded_GRUB_2_boot_prompt
and maybe got closer to a good boot, but I'm still seeing that at some step in
the boot process, it wants to find the
antonio montagnani ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on
19/09/2013 17:16:
I have installed a F19 on an old laptop with Nvidia G72M (Quadro NVS
110M/ Geforce Go 7300).
Installed Gnome 3 but when I want to see all application instead of more
frequent, nothing appears.I noticed also some
On 09/19/2013 06:30 AM, Mark Haney issued this missive:
I posted an issue I was having booting a new install of F19 on my
Samsung netbook. It seems that my system cannot find the disks by UUID
for some reason. The way I fixed this before was to edit grub to use
the device name /dev/sda5 (which
I hate top posting, but I have more information that Ihope might help. I tried
the steps in:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2#Encountering_the_dreaded_GRUB_2_boot_prompt
and maybe got closer to a good boot, but I'm still seeing that at some step in
the boot process, it wants to find the pa
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Shelby, James wrote:
> I believe the syntax is: firewall-cmd --permanent --add-port 5002/udp
>From what I can tell that's the equivalent of --dport, not --sport...
Otherwise it would work from firewall-config.
Thanks,
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists.
I have installed a F19 on an old laptop with Nvidia G72M (Quadro NVS
110M/ Geforce Go 7300).
Installed Gnome 3 but when I want to see all application instead of more
frequent, nothing appears.I noticed also some artifacts on some windows.
No problem when user starts LXDE instead of Gnome 3.
Tnx
I believe the syntax is: firewall-cmd --permanent --add-port 5002/udp
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Richard Shaw
[hobbes1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 7:40 AM
To: Comm
I have a HDHomeRun (network based TV tuner) on my home network. In order to
get it to work I had to add the following to my iptables config:
-A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --sport 5002 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --sport 5004 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m state --sta
I posted an issue I was having booting a new install of F19 on my Samsung
netbook. It seems that my system cannot find the disks by UUID for some
reason. The way I fixed this before was to edit grub to use the device name
/dev/sda5 (which is /boot) instead of UUID. Some people replied that I
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 11:34 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > Ok, not complaining to anyone on this thread, but I would love to see
> > the rational for per application printer discovery! That makes
> > absolutely no sense to me.
>
> It's not that
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 11:34 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Ok, not complaining to anyone on this thread, but I would love to see
> the rational for per application printer discovery! That makes
> absolutely no sense to me.
It's not that it's per-application -- rather, it's done in the client
libra
16 matches
Mail list logo
