Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> g wrote:
>>
>> greets,
>>
>> what is needed to convert .wmv file to mp4 or what ever?
>>
>>
>> tia.
>
> fmpeg or mencoder should both did it.
Excuse for typo - 'ffmpeg' is right.
Both these packages are in rpmfusion repository.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorap
On 09/07/2013 10:30 PM, g wrote:
greets,
what is needed to convert .wmv file to mp4 or what ever?
The program you want, oddly enough, is named convert. It's part of the
ImageMagic package. As it happens, I just used it today to change some
Microsoft icon files (.ico) into .png because Xfc
g wrote:
>
> greets,
>
> what is needed to convert .wmv file to mp4 or what ever?
>
>
> tia.
fmpeg or mencoder should both did it.
Franta
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> what is needed to convert .wmv file to mp4 or what ever?
try that: http://www.radioactivepages.com/asfbin.aspx
I have done it recently under windows but it says it works also on linux.
Frédéric
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
ht
greets,
what is needed to convert .wmv file to mp4 or what ever?
tia.
--
peace out.
in a world with out fences, who needs gates.
sl6.3 linux
tc.hago.
g
.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> This may interest you,
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RawhideKernelNodebug
Thanks Rex!. Looks like a good way to try recent kernels without compiling.
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act
- G
Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> A few questions considering the nice improvements [1] in Kernel 3.11
>
> 1. Is there a kernel spec file for Fedora 19 that could be used to compile
> a 3.11 kernel with the same build parameters as the F19 one?
This may interest you,
https://fedoraproject.
On 09/07/2013 04:30 PM, g wrote:
not really. it was what wikipedia found in search. i guess wikipedia does
not know all the general answers. :=)
Odd. I put Easter Offensive into the search bar and got exactly what I
was looking for. What search term did you use?
BTW, if you want to discus
On 09/07/2013 06:01 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 09/07/2013 03:25 PM, g wrote:
ok. i looked it up;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARVN
another fine example of how screwed up things can get with lack of good
communications.
Try looking here instead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter_Offensive
be
On 09/07/2013 03:25 PM, g wrote:
ok. i looked it up;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARVN
another fine example of how screwed up things can get with lack of good
communications.
Try looking here instead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter_Offensive
because it deals with the offensive in quest
On 09/07/2013 04:20 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
<>
No. The Easter Offensive was in '72, when the NVA poured across the
border with 150,000 men and more armor than the Germans sent to the
Kursk Salient. They ended up with a few positions south of the border,
and got back 50,000 men on foot. ARVN did
On 09/07/2013 02:00 PM, g wrote:
On 09/07/2013 03:01 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 09/07/2013 03:31 AM, g wrote:
"Tonkin Gulf" sounded familiar, so i ran a search.
you were there around the time of 'delimitation'. had it been 1964. it
would
not have been so "Boring!".
Steaming in and out of
On 09/07/2013 03:01 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 09/07/2013 03:31 AM, g wrote:
"Tonkin Gulf" sounded familiar, so i ran a search.
you were there around the time of 'delimitation'. had it been 1964. it
would
not have been so "Boring!".
Steaming in and out of a fog bank was boring. I suggest
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Note though, that this feature will not minimize the writes to the SSD.
> Quite the opposite
Thanks for the heads up... ok, then Il'll put a HDD to cache writes to
the SSD that caches writes to the HDD... no,wait..
joke,joke...
FC
--
D
On 09/07/2013 03:31 AM, g wrote:
"Tonkin Gulf" sounded familiar, so i ran a search.
you were there around the time of 'delimitation'. had it been 1964. it
would
not have been so "Boring!".
Steaming in and out of a fog bank was boring. I suggest that you read
up on the Easter Offensive,
> - Original Message -
> From: Mike Wright
> Sent: 09/07/13 08:11 PM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: tls
>
> 09/07/2013 11:07 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > HELLO,
> >
> > I may have make some progress.
> > I can SSL/TLS on a local machine but it does not work on a
On 07/09/13 14:02, Mike Wright wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anybody know of a free CA (Certificate Authority) that is
> recognized by common browsers? I have some very low volume
> non-commercial sites and cannot justify spending $100/year on
> certificates for them.
>
> I tried CAcert by no matter
09/07/2013 11:02 AM, Mike Wright wrote:
Hi all,
Does anybody know of a free CA (Certificate Authority) that is
recognized by common browsers? I have some very low volume
non-commercial sites and cannot justify spending $100/year on
certificates for them.
Timing is everything...
http://cert.s
On 09/07/2013 01:02 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anybody know of a free CA (Certificate Authority) that is
> recognized by common browsers? I have some very low volume
> non-commercial sites and cannot justify spending $100/year on
> certificates for them.
>
> I tried CAcert by no m
09/07/2013 11:07 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
HELLO,
I may have make some progress.
I can SSL/TLS on a local machine but it does not work on a remote.
I get (filezilla):
Disconnected from server
Status: Resolving address of homere
Status: Connecting to 193.49.194.196:21...
Status: Connection attem
HELLO,
I may have make some progress.
I can SSL/TLS on a local machine but it does not work on a remote.
I get (filezilla):
Disconnected from server
Status: Resolving address of homere
Status: Connecting to 193.49.194.196:21...
Status: Connection attempt failed with "EHOSTUNREACH - No route to ho
Hi all,
Does anybody know of a free CA (Certificate Authority) that is
recognized by common browsers? I have some very low volume
non-commercial sites and cannot justify spending $100/year on
certificates for them.
I tried CAcert by no matter what I did they said they could not contact
my
On 09/07/2013 03:40 AM, Walter Cazzola wrote:
Dear Fedora experts,
I was going to install the new Fedora 19 on a old desktop computer but
it hangs after "starting Live Fedora" message. I have tried both x64 and
x32 version without any luck.
My computer is an Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8200 @ 2
On Thursday, September 05, 2013 05:45:49 AM Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
irrelevant,
Not irrelevant, I was responding to Martin's comment that said "as it would
report 21.0
already installed". I wanted for Martin to understand I asked fo
On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 10:15:32 -0500
g wrote:
> sure would be nice if fedoraproject would create a 'general' list like
> mozilla did. then reminiscing would not be a thread unraveler. ;=)
Well, to get back on topic then, I'll just point out
for the tin foil hat folks that the selinux libraries
are
On 09/07/2013 06:39 AM, Tim wrote:
<>
I can remember the lovely lilac corona you could get when you poked the
end of a screwdriver *near* the tripler in a CRT set. Tens of thousands
of volts going *almost* through you (more like around the outside of
you, rather than through your innards), bu
Hello,
Thank.
Port 990, is the default (filezilla).
By the way, using firewall-config.
In public zone service ssh is check but not ftp. Am I supposed to check ftp?
The port for ftp is 21 (I guess default).
There is no service ftps, do I need to create it?
I can easy create port 990, but I not know
On 07.09.2013, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Btw, what is the default for this option in Fedora, on or off? If the
> default is on, how to turn it off in the cleanest possible way?
Enabling CONFIG_BCACHE alone doesn't do anything to your SSD. You have
to set up and register the devices you want to us
On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 09:20:29 -0300
Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> >
> > I'm not aware of such a feature added to 3.11. In case you mean
> > "bcache": it works as a block layer cache (similar to dm-cache),
> > which allows to use a solid state drive t
On 09/07/2013 04:10 PM, Walter Cazzola wrote:
> Dear Fedora experts,
> I was going to install the new Fedora 19 on a old desktop computer but
> it hangs after "starting Live Fedora" message. I have tried both x64 and
> x32 version without any luck.
>
> My computer is an Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
>
> I'm not aware of such a feature added to 3.11. In case you mean
> "bcache": it works as a block layer cache (similar to dm-cache), which
> allows to use a solid state drive to work as a cache for a
> rotational harddisk on the same system.
Ex
On 07.09.2013, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Im specially interested in that feature of 3.11 I read about last week
> -whose name I now forget, it wasnt 'lazy writes'' but close to it-
> that would minimize writes to SSDs and extend their life.
I'm not aware of such a feature added to 3.11. In case y
Allegedly, on or about 07 September 2013, g sent:
> for some reason or other, i decided to climb up on top of bridge.
> along side of ladder was cable for antenna. while climbing up, i kept
> getting a stinging on my ear, so i swatted at what i thought were
> mosquitos.
>
> after looking around ho
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:08 AM, M A Young wrote:
>
> F20 is scheduled to release with 3.11, and F19 should get a 3.11 kernel soon,
> see the recent Fedora Kernel meeting notes
Thanks Michael (and Heinz, and everyone else who replied). I think I'm
gonna wait for 3.11 to come our way from the offi
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, Fernando Cassia wrote:
1. Is there a kernel spec file for Fedora 19 that could be used to compile a
3.11 kernel with the same build parameters as the F19 one?
2. Which kernel does F20 expect to use?
F20 is scheduled to release with 3.11, and F19 should get a 3.11 kernel
s
Dear Fedora experts,
I was going to install the new Fedora 19 on a old desktop computer but
it hangs after "starting Live Fedora" message. I have tried both x64 and
x32 version without any luck.
My computer is an Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8200 @ 2.66GHz with 2
cores and probably 64bit. 4Gb of
"hello, Joe". ;=)
On 09/07/2013 02:46 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 09/06/2013 10:41 PM, g wrote:
when i descended ladder, staying well clear of antenna wire, i looked down
at water and caught glimpses of some fishes with their bio luminescence.
another great sight.
I remember seeing that when I wa
On 09/07/2013 02:38 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
I tried some of this stuff while in the service and almost got
busted! Foil on a 5-ton hut did not work well!
Mike D.
Exactly! Proof that foil trick's been foiled.
Returning to the original discussion about foiling the NSA. If you try
to foil the
On 07.09.2013, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> 1. Is there a kernel spec file for Fedora 19 that could be used to compile
> a 3.11 kernel with the same build parameters as the F19 one?
I don't know. You could use the Fedora .config which usually resides
in /boot after installing a Fedora kernel.
> 2.
On 09/06/2013 10:41 PM, g wrote:
when i descended ladder, staying well clear of antenna wire, i looked down
at water and caught glimpses of some fishes with their bio luminescence.
another great sight.
I remember seeing that when I was in Tonkin Gulf, back in '72. Never
saw any St. Elmo's fir
On 09/07/2013 12:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 07.09.2013 08:38, schrieb Rejy M Cyriac:
>> If you are using iptables for firewall, you could use the 'ip_nat_ftp'
>> and 'ip_conntrack_ftp' module if you are behind nat, or
>> 'ip_conntrack_ftp' module alone otherwise, for having the firewal
41 matches
Mail list logo
