On 25.06.2013 00:14, Arthur Dent wrote:
…
> # rpm -q kernel
> package kernel is not installed
>
> ll /boot
> total 76176
…
OK, nice.
For F17 try this one,
rpm -qa kernel*
We can manually set the existing kernels via grubby or automatically
with rpm/yum install.
Pick one.
I'll leave you with Joe
Am 24.06.2013 18:25, schrieb Frank Murphy:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 00:03:19 +0200
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> Am 23.06.2013 20:43, schrieb poma:
>>> On 23.06.2013 20:16, Frank McCormick wrote:
>>>
Further to thisI checked the grub.cfg and the other
kernels are in the list. But G
Am 25.06.2013 00:14, schrieb Arthur Dent:
> On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 00:06 +0200, poma wrote:
>> On 24.06.2013 22:35, Arthur Dent wrote:
>> …
>>
>>> What did I do wrong - and how do I get it to default to my working
>>> kernel?
>> …
>>
>> rpm -q kernel
>> ll /boot
>
> # rpm -q kernel
> package kern
On 06/24/2013 03:14 PM, Arthur Dent wrote:
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 4914208 Jan 18 17:51 vmlinuz-3.7.3-101.fc17.i686.PAE
yum remove kernel-3.7.3-101
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf
On 06/24/2013 01:35 PM, Arthur Dent wrote:
What did I do wrong - and how do I get it to default to my working
kernel?
My suggestion is to uninstall the bad kernel and then update.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fe
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 00:06 +0200, poma wrote:
> On 24.06.2013 22:35, Arthur Dent wrote:
> …
>
> > What did I do wrong - and how do I get it to default to my working
> > kernel?
> …
>
> rpm -q kernel
> ll /boot
# rpm -q kernel
package kernel is not installed
ll /boot
total 76176
-rw-r--r--. 1 r
On 24.06.2013 22:35, Arthur Dent wrote:
…
> What did I do wrong - and how do I get it to default to my working
> kernel?
…
rpm -q kernel
ll /boot
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
Hello All,
I can't update my Fedora 17 box until sometime in July due to issues I
won't bore you with.
In the meantime I have another problem. Some time ago I had a crash
during a yum update, the net result of which was the fact that the
kernel it was installing at the time became corrupted (amon
On 06/23/2013 06:03 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.06.2013 20:43, schrieb poma:
On 23.06.2013 20:16, Frank McCormick wrote:
Further to thisI checked the grub.cfg and the other kernels are
in the list. But Grub is not displaying them when advanced options
is picked. It only displays th
On 06/24/2013 06:25 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> He forgot the version:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908528
> Fixed In Version: grub2-2.00-16
Who's forgotten and what's forgotten!? :)
Although your namesake mentions F17/18/19, he actually
alludes to the F19 - grub2-2.00-22.fc19 that
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:52:24AM +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> How can I see the total disk size of my hard disk?
>
> I have used the following command:
>
> # fdisk -l | grep Disk
> Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors
> Disk identifier: 0x0003dd50
> Disk /dev/mapper/f
On 06/24/2013 12:25 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 00:03:19 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.06.2013 20:43, schrieb poma:
On 23.06.2013 20:16, Frank McCormick wrote:
Further to thisI checked the grub.cfg and the other
kernels are in the list. But Grub is not displaying
On 06/24/2013 01:10 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:16:22 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 06/23/2013 01:47 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
Reposting on Fedora list because it's not only 19 affected
I noticed this morning that when I run grub2-mkconfig from my fedora
19 partiti
On 06/21/2013 04:16 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Does the size of the hard disk affect Fedora's performance?
>
> I am looking for a 2 T disk to replace my current disk, but some
> people are warning me about performance; they say I should buy a disk
> of at most 1 T. Are they correct?
>
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 00:03:19 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 23.06.2013 20:43, schrieb poma:
> > On 23.06.2013 20:16, Frank McCormick wrote:
> >
> >> Further to thisI checked the grub.cfg and the other
> >> kernels are in the list. But Grub is not displaying them when
> >> advanced optio
Am 24.06.2013 01:24, schrieb poma:
> …
>
> Oh yeah,
> this is the only problem I've found so far, which doesn't affect
> the functioning of the grub,
> $ rpm -ql grub2-tools-2.00-22.fc19 | grep default/grub
> /etc/default/grub
> $ file /etc/sysconfig/grub
> /etc/sysconfig/grub: broken symbolic l
Am 23.06.2013 20:43, schrieb poma:
> On 23.06.2013 20:16, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
>> Further to thisI checked the grub.cfg and the other kernels are
>> in the list. But Grub is not displaying them when advanced options
>> is picked. It only displays the one kernel.
>
> Simplify,
> /etc/d
Am 24.06.2013 00:47, schrieb Tom Horsley:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 06:30:00 +0800
> Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> Just the smallest amount of googling suggests that an xorg.conf option
>> exists for this
>>
>> Option "BROADCAST_RGB" "0" or "1"
>
> Absolutely true, and a fantastically large amo
Am 23.06.2013 23:28, schrieb Paul Smith:
> I have now a new disk running on my machine
>
> Model Family: Western Digital Caviar Green (AF, SATA 6Gb/s)
> SATA Version is: SATA 3.0, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)
>
> Why is not my disk with
>
> current: 3.0 Gb/s
because it is most liekly con
Am 23.06.2013 14:50, schrieb Tim:
>> which has nothing to do with *a disk* larger than 1 TB
>> it's more depending on the partitions you create
>
> It has an awful lot to do with such large discs. What's the default
> partitioning for Windows? One partition that covers the entire drive
who ca
Am 23.06.2013 20:16, schrieb Frank McCormick:
> On 06/23/2013 01:47 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
>>
>> Reposting on Fedora list because it's not only 19 affected
>>
>>
>> I noticed this morning that when I run grub2-mkconfig from my fedora 19
>> partition, or from my 18 partition
>> it does not f
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 08:58:17AM +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> I read a bit about the difference between "Hibernate" and "Suspend".
> I use my laptop as virtualization host too, and wonder what about
> the VMs when Suspending.
> I works fairly well when no VM is launched.
> What is supo
On Jun 24 11:58, poma wrote:
> On 24.06.2013 09:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> …
> > Thanks, but... what are you trying to tell me? I already started
> > vncserver as service along the lines of the above
> …
>
> With aforementioned lines I completed my working setup example.
> That may be useful i
On 24.06.2013 09:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
…
> Thanks, but... what are you trying to tell me? I already started
> vncserver as service along the lines of the above
…
With aforementioned lines I completed my working setup example.
That may be useful information for other people, too, right. ;)
On Jun 23 13:23, poma wrote:
> On 22.06.2013 16:57, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > The same message is in the vncserver log file, btw. I'm starting the
> > XFCE4 desktop via `exec startxfce4 --with-ck-launch' and ck-launch-session
> > starts and runs. What else can I do?!?
> >
> >
> > Thanks fo
Joe Zeff writes:
> On 06/22/2013 06:49 PM, lee wrote:
>> Joe Zeff writes:
>>
>>> On 06/21/2013 09:19 PM, lee wrote:
And how would I disable it? Mdmonitor is stopped and disabled, and md
is still running.
>>>
>>> systemctl stop SERVICENAME.service
>>> systemctl mask SERVICENAME.service
On Jun 23 18:21, poma wrote:
> On 23.06.2013 17:01, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> …
> > Btw., just for the records, I had found an ugly workaround in the
> > meantime, but it did the trick:
> >
> > I started startxfce4 from ~/.Xclients via `ssh localhost'. This
> > enforced a valid session, which mad
27 matches
Mail list logo
