On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:28:59 +0800
Lingxian Guo wrote:
> Just but unfamiliar，I am using Fedora 18 64bit .The plugin of the
> Adobe Flash Player should be installed to Firefox,I do not know how
> to do?
1: https://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
2: yum for linux
3: Download Now and Install it.
4: in t
On 10.06.2013, Lingxian Guo wrote:
> Just but unfamiliar，I am using Fedora 18 64bit .The plugin of the Adobe
> Flash Player should be installed to Firefox,I do not know how to do?
1. Download the plugin from Adobe from
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ and choose the tar.gz. file.
2. Copy libfl
On 08.06.2013 10:55, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 17:53:59 -0400
> Jim wrote:
>
>> On 06/07/2013 05:46 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>> if you click proceed
>>> to "unsigned certificate" in a popup.
>>
>> if you click proceed
>> to "unsigned certificate" in a popup.
>>
>>
>> Popup Whe
Just but unfamiliar，I am using Fedora 18 64bit .The plugin of the Adobe
Flash Player should be installed to Firefox,I do not know how to do?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Gui
On 09.06.2013 03:14, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/08/13 20:40, Frédéric Bron wrote:
>> I have a lot of problems with the nvidia proprietary driver. However
>> nouveau is very much too slow so that I have to use the nvidia driver.
>> They ask for logverbose option to be set to at least 6 to send bug
>>
Dear Folks,
I'll share my experience with upgrading four (non-virtual) machines
from Fedora 18 to Fedora 19. In each case, I used
fedup-0.7.3-4.fc18.noarch from updates-testing, performing a network
upgrade. None of the upgrades were hampered by lack of disk space.
The first two went beautiful
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Richard Vickery
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> As part of a temporary experiment, I put an Nvidia card in
>> my system:
>>
>> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF108 [GeForce GT 430]
>> (rev a1)
>> 01:00.1 Audio
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> As part of a temporary experiment, I put an Nvidia card in
> my system:
>
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF108 [GeForce GT 430]
> (rev a1)
> 01:00.1 Audio device: NVIDIA Corporation GF108 High Definition Audio
> Contro
Am 08.06.2013 22:03, schrieb Beartooth:
> On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 12:37:50 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
>> Two things: first, when you do your fresh install, put /home onto its
>> own partition. That way, there's less chance that you'll need that
>> backup after your next upgrade or clean install. (P
On 09.06.2013 23:05, Tom Horsley wrote:
> As part of a temporary experiment, I put an Nvidia card in
> my system:
>
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF108 [GeForce GT 430]
> (rev a1)
> 01:00.1 Audio device: NVIDIA Corporation GF108 High Definition Audio
> Controller (rev a
On 09.06.2013 00:46, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 08:14:34PM +, Beartooth wrote:
>> Iirc, there has always been a way to do a fresh install off the
>> Net, though I've never had the confidence to try it. But the wording on
>> the wiki page about Fedup somehow sounds to
On 06.06.2013 10:30, Gerhard Gappmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to get F18 installed on a server (x86_64). The setup is quiet easy
> and typical for a server:
>
> Partitions:
> sda1: primary partition, 512M
> sda2: primary partition, rest of the disk
> sdb1: primary partition, 512M
> sdb2
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:29 PM, lee wrote:
> Ah hm, I've done the above and removed some other packages that don't
> seem to be needed anymore. Let me try cleandupes ...
>
> Dupes are all gone now, it didn't find any. I have orphaned packages:
I wouldn't worry about these. A package being "or
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 11:34 AM, lee wrote:
> Same result, no packages marked for sync. It doesn't do anything and
> the packages from 17 remain installed along with the ones from 18.
Hmm, maybe your repository configuration is still unhappy? What does
`yum repolist` say?
Also, you could try a
Anyone figured out how to get netflix working on f18x64?
I have tried the netflix-desktop-0.2.2-1.fc18.noarch rpm and manually installed
silverlight with:
WINEARCH=win64 WINEPREFIX=/home/jcasale/.netflix-desktop wine Silverlight.exe /q
as well as the automated installer from
http://sourceforge.
As part of a temporary experiment, I put an Nvidia card in
my system:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF108 [GeForce GT 430]
(rev a1)
01:00.1 Audio device: NVIDIA Corporation GF108 High Definition Audio Controller
(rev a1)
The gnome-control-center sound panel seems to beli
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 21:20:30 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
>> Hmm, I could do
>>
>> package-cleanup --dupes | grep fc17 | xargs yum remove
>>
>> ... but how do I know if essential packages are being removed that
>> way? At least what yum says looks good as in that there don't seem
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 21:20:30 +0200
lee wrote:
> Hmm, I could do
>
> package-cleanup --dupes | grep fc17 | xargs yum remove
>
> ... but how do I know if essential packages are being removed that
> way? At least what yum says looks good as in that there don't seem to
> be any packages from 18 rem
lee writes:
> Frank Murphy writes:
>
>> On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 22:51:52 +0200
>> lee wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> running the update from 17 to 18 failed after going 67% through,
>>> please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972358 .
>>>
>>> What can I do now so I'm not stuck with a mi
Frank Murphy writes:
> On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 22:51:52 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> running the update from 17 to 18 failed after going 67% through,
>> please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972358 .
>>
>> What can I do now so I'm not stuck with a mixture of 17 and 18?
>>
>>
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 22:51:52 +0200
lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> running the update from 17 to 18 failed after going 67% through,
> please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972358 .
>
> What can I do now so I'm not stuck with a mixture of 17 and 18?
>
>
Apologies, for the link to comple
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 22:51:52 +0200
lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> running the update from 17 to 18 failed after going 67% through,
> please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972358 .
>
> What can I do now so I'm not stuck with a mixture of 17 and 18?
>
>
Reboot with enforcing=0 on the ker
Joe Zeff writes:
> On 06/08/2013 01:51 PM, lee wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> running the update from 17 to 18 failed after going 67% through, please
>> see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972358 .
>>
>> What can I do now so I'm not stuck with a mixture of 17 and 18?
>>
>>
>
> Have you tried yum
Allegedly, on or about 08 June 2013, Joe Zeff sent:
> Then, when you create your username during firstboot, you use the same
> one as you did before and tell the program to use the same folder and
> to leave the contents intact.
If you have more than one user, then either make sure that the newly
24 matches
Mail list logo
