Re: man chmod (2) How?

2013-06-04 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 04Jun2013 11:28, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote: | On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: | > Trying to learn some of this "man" pages | > | > How do you of experience use "man chmod (2)" | > keeps coming up as chmod1 | | You can specify the section number first, like so: | |

Re: New avconv instead of ffmpeg

2013-06-04 Thread Peter Gueckel
Richard Shaw wrote: > RPM Fusion generally follows the Fedora guidelines, which include > when and when not to update, so 1.0.X to 1.1.X would generally be > discouraged within a release. I asked on their mailing list during roughly fedora 16, about a year or more ago, and this is what they told

Re: fedup-cli failed to upgrade from 18 to 19

2013-06-04 Thread Martin Airs
On Tuesday 04 Jun 2013 22:07:29 Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: > > I can't. Disk layout is fixed (but if all fails, I can try to mount > /var/cache/yum on some USB disk). I'm doing massive cleanup now on my / > (root). > > This still does not explain this error message. It should tell me what > is t

Re: fedup-cli failed to upgrade from 18 to 19

2013-06-04 Thread Mateusz Marzantowicz
On 04.06.2013 22:14, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 22:07:29 +0200 > Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: > . Now I read I have 1.2G but it failed >> because of not having 150M of free space. >> >> > You might have but did you > "df -h /" > > Yes, it confirms that there is 1.2G of free space. I'

Re: fedup-cli failed to upgrade from 18 to 19

2013-06-04 Thread Frank Murphy
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 22:07:29 +0200 Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: . Now I read I have 1.2G but it failed > because of not having 150M of free space. > > You might have but did you "df -h /" -- Regards, Frank - I check for new mail app. 20min www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list users@lists.

Re: fedup-cli failed to upgrade from 18 to 19

2013-06-04 Thread Mateusz Marzantowicz
On 04.06.2013 21:54, Martin Airs wrote: > On Tuesday 04 Jun 2013 21:42:06 Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: >> I don't quite understand this error that occurred during Fedora upgrade. >> >> I did: fedup-cli --network 19, the result is: >> >> Upgrade test failed with the following problems: >> insufficien

Re: fedup-cli failed to upgrade from 18 to 19

2013-06-04 Thread Martin Airs
On Tuesday 04 Jun 2013 21:42:06 Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: > I don't quite understand this error that occurred during Fedora upgrade. > > I did: fedup-cli --network 19, the result is: > > Upgrade test failed with the following problems: > insufficient disk space > need 150M free on / (1.2G fre

fedup-cli failed to upgrade from 18 to 19

2013-06-04 Thread Mateusz Marzantowicz
I don't quite understand this error that occurred during Fedora upgrade. I did: fedup-cli --network 19, the result is: Upgrade test failed with the following problems: insufficient disk space need 150M free on / (1.2G free) fedup ERROR: Upgrade test failed. It needs 150 M but it states it has

Re: man chmod (2) How?

2013-06-04 Thread Nalin Dahyabhai
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 09:55:57AM -0800, Fred Erickson wrote: > The man 2 chmod command doesn't seem to work on my system: > [fred@athbox-f18 ~]$ uname -r > 3.9.4-200.fc18.x86_64 > [fred@athbox-f18 ~]$ man 2 chmod > No manual entry for chmod in section 2 On my system, the corresponding file (/usr

Re: man chmod (2) How?

2013-06-04 Thread Fred Erickson
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:36:07 +0100 Gary Stainburn wrote: > On Tuesday 04 June 2013 16:28:14 Frank Murphy wrote: > > Trying to learn some of this "man" pages > > > > How do you of experience use "man chmod (2)" > > keeps coming up as chmod1 > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Frank - I check for new ma

Re: man chmod (2) How?

2013-06-04 Thread Nalin Dahyabhai
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > Trying to learn some of this "man" pages > > How do you of experience use "man chmod (2)" > keeps coming up as chmod1 You can specify the section number first, like so: man 2 chmod Cheers, Nalin -- users mailing list users@list

man chmod (2) How?

2013-06-04 Thread Wojciech Komornicki
man 2 chmod > "Frank" == Frank Murphy writes: Frank:> Trying to learn some of this "man" pages Frank:> How do you of experience use "man chmod (2)" Frank:> keeps coming up as chmod1 -- Wojciech Komornicki Dept of Mathemati

Re: man chmod (2) How?

2013-06-04 Thread Jack Craig
man 2 chmod ... hth, ... On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > Trying to learn some of this "man" pages > > How do you of experience use "man chmod (2)" > keeps coming up as chmod1 > > > -- > Regards, > Frank - I check for new mail app. 20min > www.frankly3d.com > -- > users

Re: man chmod (2) How?

2013-06-04 Thread Gary Stainburn
On Tuesday 04 June 2013 16:28:14 Frank Murphy wrote: > Trying to learn some of this "man" pages > > How do you of experience use "man chmod (2)" > keeps coming up as chmod1 > > > -- > Regards, > Frank - I check for new mail app. 20min > www.frankly3d.com man 2 chmod -- Gary Stainburn Group I.T

man chmod (2) How?

2013-06-04 Thread Frank Murphy
Trying to learn some of this "man" pages How do you of experience use "man chmod (2)" keeps coming up as chmod1 -- Regards, Frank - I check for new mail app. 20min www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin

Re: fedup from beta

2013-06-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 09:17:16 -0400 Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/03/2013 04:32 PM, Richard Vickery wrote: > > > Hi Kevin: > > > > I'm not sure that if my question was presented clearly enough; I am > > on F19 beta; I was asking for when we

Re: New avconv instead of ffmpeg

2013-06-04 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 06/04/2013 08:47 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > > Maybe in the rawhide repo, in the f18 repos it is: > > ffmpeg-1.0.7-1.fc18.x86_64 > > > > I was looking at the Fedora 19 repo. > > You can always file a bug with RPMFusion with a RFE for a

Re: New avconv instead of ffmpeg

2013-06-04 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 06/04/2013 08:47 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > Maybe in the rawhide repo, in the f18 repos it is: > ffmpeg-1.0.7-1.fc18.x86_64 > I was looking at the Fedora 19 repo. You can always file a bug with RPMFusion with a RFE for a newer version, but I imagine the reasoning for maintaining a "stable" versi

Re: New avconv instead of ffmpeg

2013-06-04 Thread Tom Horsley
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 08:39:39 -0500 Michael Cronenworth wrote: > RPMFusion contains an up-to-date version of ffmpeg (1.2.1). Maybe in the rawhide repo, in the f18 repos it is: ffmpeg-1.0.7-1.fc18.x86_64 (And the last time I tried to use the rawhide rpmfusion ffmpeg, it segfaulted as soon as I typ

Re: New avconv instead of ffmpeg

2013-06-04 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 06/04/2013 08:14 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > And if you go to the ffmpeg web site downloads page > you can find static builds for linux that work well > and have all the documented features (unlike the > ancient versions of ffmpeg in the fedora repos). What do you mean by "ancient versions?" RPMF

Re: fedup from beta

2013-06-04 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/03/2013 04:32 PM, Richard Vickery wrote: > Hi Kevin: > > I'm not sure that if my question was presented clearly enough; I am > on F19 beta; I was asking for when we complete the release and > upgrade to it: how does one upgrade from F19 pre-rel

Re: New avconv instead of ffmpeg

2013-06-04 Thread Tom Horsley
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:07:25 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: > ffmpeg is the origininal and well maintained And if you go to the ffmpeg web site downloads page you can find static builds for linux that work well and have all the documented features (unlike the ancient versions of ffmpeg in the fedora

Re: fedup from beta

2013-06-04 Thread Richard Vickery
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 31 May 2013 10:46:29 -0700 > "Richard M. Vickery" wrote: > >> I hope this isn't in HTML - please alert me if it is; I don't know if >> fedup changed the mail setup, and forget where Thunderbird's >> check-box is to fix it. >> >> I'm jus

Re: fedup from beta

2013-06-04 Thread Richard Vickery
On 6/3/13, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 31 May 2013 10:46:29 -0700 > "Richard M. Vickery" wrote: > >> I hope this isn't in HTML - please alert me if it is; I don't know if >> fedup changed the mail setup, and forget where Thunderbird's >> check-box is to fix it. >> >> I'm just curious as to how t

Re: New avconv instead of ffmpeg

2013-06-04 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 04.06.2013 09:26, schrieb Dario Lesca: > About ffmpeg, a Debian's user say: > >> "This package contains the deprecated ffmpeg program. This package >> also serves as a transitional package to libav-tools. Users are >> advised to use avconv from the libav-tools package instead of ffmpeg. >> >>

New avconv instead of ffmpeg

2013-06-04 Thread Dario Lesca
About ffmpeg, a Debian's user say: > "This package contains the deprecated ffmpeg program. This package > also serves as a transitional package to libav-tools. Users are > advised to use avconv from the libav-tools package instead of ffmpeg. > > Libav is a complete, cross-platform solution to dec

Re: Azureus restart script?

2013-06-04 Thread Frank Murphy
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 08:09:28 +1000 Cameron Simpson wrote: > > But next time? Test drive the script yourself from the command line; > half of this would have been found immediately. It was, hence the question, and no output to c&p. Unfortunately, an empty else, was taught to us as a Java primiti