Bob Goodwin:
> The old system-config-network was better for my purposes but
> attempts to remove NM have caused extremely long "boot" times each
> time I've tried that. It would increase from the present thirty
> seconds or so to several minutes
Seemingly network-related prolonged bootup times co
On 17/11/12 18:33, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 11/17/2012 03:16 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 17/11/12 17:59, Joe Zeff wrote:
Network Connection Test
I wasn't aware of that one. Where did you find it? I use XFCE if
that matters.
So do I, and as it's part of yumex, it's not
On 11/17/2012 03:16 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 17/11/12 17:59, Joe Zeff wrote:
Network Connection Test
I wasn't aware of that one. Where did you find it? I use XFCE if
that matters.
So do I, and as it's part of yumex, it's not relevant. In yumex go to
Edit->Pr
On 17/11/12 17:59, Joe Zeff wrote:
Network Connection Test
I wasn't aware of that one. Where did you find it? I use XFCE if
that matters.
--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box7
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admi
On 11/17/2012 02:51 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
I find Yumex convenient at times, mainly for it's list of available
app's. Yumex would not connect until I yum removed NetworkManager?
I don't know what else it may have caused problems with.
I have a desktop with NM
On 16/11/12 13:47, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
The old system-config-network was better for my purposes but
attempts to remove NM have caused extremely long "boot" times each
time I've tried that. It would increase from the present thirty
seconds or so to several minutes. I
>> Is there a kill signal that I can send? Is there a more appropriate
>> command to use?
>
> Huh? Amavisd reads rules for spamassassin?
Indirectly, yes. If you don't have something to contribute other than
a wise-ass answer, stfu.
Regards,
Alex
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.o
Am 17.11.2012 20:04, schrieb lee:
> Reindl Harald writes:
>
>> Am 17.11.2012 16:25, schrieb lee:
>>> Networkmanager is forcibly installed by default and breaks things when
>>> you do that --- add that to the list of problems. It should either use
>>> its own independent way or operate accordin
| From: Sergio
| --- Em sáb, 17/11/12, D. Hugh Redelmeier escreveu:
| > Does anyone know how to change abrt's idea of Bugzilla
| > credentials?
| Go in 'Preferences' and re-configure the bugzilla account.
Ah, thanks. I had tried that menu but didn't know what to do there.
With your encourage
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 17.11.2012 16:25, schrieb lee:
>> Networkmanager is forcibly installed by default and breaks things when
>> you do that --- add that to the list of problems. It should either use
>> its own independent way or operate according to the information provided
>> in such fil
Am 17.11.2012 18:29, schrieb Joachim Backes:
> On 11/17/2012 05:15 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
>> People,
>
>> Is there some way of doing this? - even for a simple situation like
>> opening a text file in Vim?
>
> Perhaps this helps? See the following manpages:
>
> Inotify
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/17/2012 05:15 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> People,
>
> Is there some way of doing this? - even for a simple situation like
> opening a text file in Vim?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Phil.
>
Perhaps this helps? See the following manpages:
Inotify
Am 17.11.2012 18:20, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 17.11.2012 17:15, schrieb Philip Rhoades:
>> Is there some way of doing this? - even for a simple situation like opening
>> a text file in Vim?
>
> no and this is good as it is
> the usespace must not bother over what VFS does
> you do not need t
Am 17.11.2012 17:15, schrieb Philip Rhoades:
> Is there some way of doing this? - even for a simple situation like opening a
> text file in Vim?
no and this is good as it is
the usespace must not bother over what VFS does
you do not need to know this because it is transparent
signature.asc
D
People,
Is there some way of doing this? - even for a simple situation like
opening a text file in Vim?
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Philip Rhoades
GPO Box 3411
Sydney NSW 2001
Australia
E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscri
El mar, 13-11-2012 a las 18:48 +0100, lee escribió:
>
> There is some documentation on
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Power_Management_Guide/index.html
> which might be interesting for you.
>
>
> --
> Fedora 17
Thank you, very much! I'm reading
On 11/17/2012 08:47 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> To spell it out.
> My server is an HP MicroServer running CentOS-6.3 .
> My laptop is a ThinkPad T61p running Fedora-17/KDE .
> I have shown above the entry I have in /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf on the server .
What is your AP?
--
Programming today is a
Am 17.11.2012 16:25, schrieb lee:
> Networkmanager is forcibly installed by default and breaks things when
> you do that --- add that to the list of problems. It should either use
> its own independent way or operate according to the information provided
> in such files instead of messing things
On 11/17/2012 11:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/17/2012 08:47 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Ed Greshko wrote:
>>
Also, in my experience NM does NOT get the DNS settings from the server.
I run NM on my Fedora-17/KDE laptop.
Normally this works fine - it has certainly improved gr
On 11/17/2012 08:47 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>>> Also, in my experience NM does NOT get the DNS settings from the server.
>>>
>>> I run NM on my Fedora-17/KDE laptop.
>>> Normally this works fine - it has certainly improved greatly over the
>>> years. But if I go out of WiFi
Alex writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I've discovered that when I use "service amavisd reload" to signal
> amavisd to reload the spamassassin rules, it sometimes exits
> completely. If I use restart, it works fine.
>
> However, using restart seems unecessary. What is the proper way to
> signal amavisd to re
Suvayu Ali writes:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:40:03PM +0100, lee wrote:
>> > I believe what you say above is wrong. NM respects the ifcfg-* scripts
>> > as it should. What the OP is missing is this line:
>>
>> Then how come that it has emptied out my /etc/resolv.conf though
>> resolving inf
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 17.11.2012 00:10, schrieb lee:
>
>>> You never get guest computers, or get asked to take in someone else's
>>> computer and fix it, or install Linux on it for them? You never add new
>>> devices? Some of which really expect DHCP (network printers, gaming
>>> consoles,
--- Em sáb, 17/11/12, D. Hugh Redelmeier escreveu:
> De: D. Hugh Redelmeier
> Assunto: abrt: how can you change bugzilla credentials?
> Para: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Data: Sábado, 17 de Novembro de 2012, 12:33
> On Fedora 17, I'm getting a few
> aborts. Before I get to the fundamental
Allegedly, on or about 16 November 2012, Reindl Harald sent:
> i agree that it makes no sense if there is no useful domain but the
> benefits for cases where you have one beats the overhead easily
I've tended to find that it's easier to do things if you do have a
domain name, even if you've faked
On Fedora 17, I'm getting a few aborts. Before I get to the fundamental
problem, I'd like to let "abrt" file a BZ.
The problem is that I mistyped the password when abrt first ran. Now it
always uses that wrong password. So it can never succeed.
Does anyone know how to change abrt's idea of B
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Um, no, NM was an *upgrade* from the network service, since the latter
> doesn't handle wireless interfaces in a reasonable way.
I don't agree.
The network service runs reasonably well with WiFi,
though it is not as convenient as NM.
> If anything,
> the old network ser
Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Also, in my experience NM does NOT get the DNS settings from the server.
>>
>> I run NM on my Fedora-17/KDE laptop.
>> Normally this works fine - it has certainly improved greatly over the
>> years. But if I go out of WiFi range then NM comments out the DNS entries
>> in /etc/
On 11/13/2012 12:04 PM, lee wrote:
Steve writes:
On 11/10/2012 10:11 AM, Steve wrote:
F16 install, KDE, fully up to date.
Did an upgrade to F17 via the F17 DVD.
Now all the system fonts are messed up, size wise. All of them are
way too large.
On the session login screen, for example, the
On 17/11/12 18:01, Frank Murphy wrote:
Would it be possible to sidegrade from a 64bit install to 32bit.
This is just for my own bag of info collection.
Rather that a "lets go do it" project.
It would be possible if you're into pain :-) I certainly wouldn't expect
it to be a few commands or a
Would it be possible to sidegrade from a 64bit install to 32bit.
This is just for my own bag of info collection.
Rather that a "lets go do it" project.
Regards,
Frank
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
Would it be possible to sidegrade from a 64bit install to 32bit.
This is just for my own bag of info collection.
Rather that a "lets go do it" project.
Regards,
Frank
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
32 matches
Mail list logo
