Re: Renewing sendmail.pem, and other self-signed certs

2012-11-04 Thread Philip Prindeville
On 10/30/12 5:50 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 10/28/2012 01:50 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: >> I tried to use the script below to extract the key, subject, and >> serial #, and generate a new cert based on the same, but for whatever >> reason Thunderbird balks at it with: > > Your message didn'

ipset bug?

2012-11-04 Thread Bill Shirley
Notice the timeout value is wrong in the ipset created below: [root@moses bin]# rpm -q ipset ipset-6.11-1.fc17.x86_64 [root@moses bin]# ipset x HTTPhacker [root@moses bin]# ipset create HTTPhacker hash:ip timeout 86400 [root@moses bin]# ipset list HTTPhacker Name: HTTPhacker Type: hash:ip Header:

Re: "Please verify your user details" when trying to access a Windows 7 share

2012-11-04 Thread Robert Myers
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Running Windows 7 in a virtual machine, I shared a folder, publically. I > told Windows to share it with "Everyone". > > Back in Fedora, I choose "Connect to server" option in the "Computer" window > from the Gnome desktop, change the type

Re: focus stuck to one window

2012-11-04 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Ranjan Maitra writes: On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 19:24:56 -0500 Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Joe Zeff writes: > > > On 11/04/2012 03:06 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > >> > >> > >> Execute 'init 4' to kill X. Then, you may need to press CTRL-ALT-F1, or > >> some other CTRL-ALT-Fx to go back to the console, l

Re: focus stuck to one window

2012-11-04 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 19:24:56 -0500 Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Joe Zeff writes: > > > On 11/04/2012 03:06 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > >> > >> > >> Execute 'init 4' to kill X. Then, you may need to press CTRL-ALT-F1, or > >> some other CTRL-ALT-Fx to go back to the console, log in, if necessary, > >

Re: focus stuck to one window

2012-11-04 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Joe Zeff writes: On 11/04/2012 03:06 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Execute 'init 4' to kill X. Then, you may need to press CTRL-ALT-F1, or some other CTRL-ALT-Fx to go back to the console, log in, if necessary, and execute 'init 5' to restart X. Init 4? Shouldn't that be 3? Not necessarily.

Re: focus stuck to one window

2012-11-04 Thread Joe Zeff
On 11/04/2012 03:06 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Execute 'init 4' to kill X. Then, you may need to press CTRL-ALT-F1, or some other CTRL-ALT-Fx to go back to the console, log in, if necessary, and execute 'init 5' to restart X. Init 4? Shouldn't that be 3? -- users mailing list users@lists.fed

Re: focus stuck to one window

2012-11-04 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Javier Perez writes: Hi FC16 here. I am having problems since my last upgrade to 3.6.2-1 Oftentimes, the focus is stuck to only one window, often the desktop itself. Even if I open other windows I cannot pass focus to them, I cannot click anything on any of these windows. somehting similar i

focus stuck to one window

2012-11-04 Thread Javier Perez
Hi FC16 here. I am having problems since my last upgrade to 3.6.2-1 Oftentimes, the focus is stuck to only one window, often the desktop itself. Even if I open other windows I cannot pass focus to them, I cannot click anything on any of these windows. somehting similar is hapenning on Ubuntu 3.2.0

Re: New 64-bit Fedora Will Not Mount Similar 32-bit Filesystem

2012-11-04 Thread Alchemist
2012/11/4 Alan Feuerbacher > On 11/4/2012 2:34 PM, Alchemist wrote: > > I more or less tried that on my old 32-bit system. I installed a new >> disk and installed Fedora on a non-LVM partition. It could not see >> the LVM partition on the older disk -- same problem as I have now. >>

Re: New 64-bit Fedora Will Not Mount Similar 32-bit Filesystem

2012-11-04 Thread Alan Feuerbacher
On 11/4/2012 2:34 PM, Alchemist wrote: I more or less tried that on my old 32-bit system. I installed a new disk and installed Fedora on a non-LVM partition. It could not see the LVM partition on the older disk -- same problem as I have now. Ok lets try shell# pvs you must see l

Re: New 64-bit Fedora Will Not Mount Similar 32-bit Filesystem

2012-11-04 Thread Alan Feuerbacher
On 11/4/2012 2:20 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: That's very useful input. Here's a lot of output based on it: ## [root@alan-fedora ~]# cat /proc/partitions major minor #blocks name 80 250059096 sda 8 16 2930266584 sdb 8 17 1024 sdb1 8

Re: New 64-bit Fedora Will Not Mount Similar 32-bit Filesystem

2012-11-04 Thread Alchemist
2012/11/4 Alan Feuerbacher > On 11/4/2012 1:10 PM, Tim wrote: > > Firstly, it was already doing "auto," as far as I'm aware, so that's >> pretty much redundant. What's really missing is *which* partition to >> try and mount on sdc. >> >> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id

Re: New 64-bit Fedora Will Not Mount Similar 32-bit Filesystem

2012-11-04 Thread Temlakos
On 11/04/2012 02:22 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: On 11/4/2012 2:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: As you can see, lsblk displays information about /dev/sdc, and shows the mount that I did earlier ("mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt/fedora32"), and shows sdc1 as an ext4 filesystem, but shows nothing about sdc2 oth

Re: New 64-bit Fedora Will Not Mount Similar 32-bit Filesystem

2012-11-04 Thread Alan Feuerbacher
On 11/4/2012 2:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: As you can see, lsblk displays information about /dev/sdc, and shows the mount that I did earlier ("mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt/fedora32"), and shows sdc1 as an ext4 filesystem, but shows nothing about sdc2 other than that it exists. Any suggestions? so ar

Re: New 64-bit Fedora Will Not Mount Similar 32-bit Filesystem

2012-11-04 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 4 Nov 2012 at 14:02, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: Date sent: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 14:02:55 -0500 From: Alan Feuerbacher To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject:Re: New 64-bit Fedora Will Not Mount Similar 32-bit Filesystem > On 11/4

Re: New 64-bit Fedora Will Not Mount Similar 32-bit Filesystem

2012-11-04 Thread Alan Feuerbacher
On 11/4/2012 1:10 PM, Tim wrote: Firstly, it was already doing "auto," as far as I'm aware, so that's pretty much redundant. What's really missing is *which* partition to try and mount on sdc. Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdc1 *2048 20684

Re: New 64-bit Fedora Will Not Mount Similar 32-bit Filesystem

2012-11-04 Thread Alan Feuerbacher
On 11/4/2012 1:33 PM, Alchemist wrote: Try with lsblk -f I did a pvscan and it came up with this: # PV /dev/sdb3 VG vg_alan-fedora lvm2 [2.73 TiB / 0free] Total: 1 [2.73 TiB] in use: 1 [2.73 TiB] / in no VG: 0 [0 ] # Why is /dev/sdc not

Re: New 64-bit Fedora Will Not Mount Similar 32-bit Filesystem

2012-11-04 Thread Alchemist
Try with lsblk -f 2012/11/4 Alan Feuerbacher > On 11/4/2012 1:07 PM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote: > > [root@alan-fedora alan]# mount /dev/sdc /mnt/fedora32 >>> >> >> Wrong. /dev/sdc1 or /dev/sdc2. >> Also you can do a pvscan and then check out what logical volumes you >> have and mount the volumes. >

Re: New 64-bit Fedora Will Not Mount Similar 32-bit Filesystem

2012-11-04 Thread Alan Feuerbacher
On 11/4/2012 1:07 PM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote: [root@alan-fedora alan]# mount /dev/sdc /mnt/fedora32 Wrong. /dev/sdc1 or /dev/sdc2. Also you can do a pvscan and then check out what logical volumes you have and mount the volumes. Thank you! I was able to mount /dev/sdc1 and look at the files the

Re: New 64-bit Fedora Will Not Mount Similar 32-bit Filesystem

2012-11-04 Thread Tim
Allegedly, on or about 04 November 2012, Alan Feuerbacher sent: > Here I'm trying to mount the old system: > ### > [root@alan-fedora alan]# mount /dev/sdc /mnt/fedora32 > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc, >missing codepage or helper program, or other erro

Re: New 64-bit Fedora Will Not Mount Similar 32-bit Filesystem

2012-11-04 Thread Hakan Koseoglu
On 4 November 2012 17:46, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: > > [root@alan-fedora alan]# mount /dev/sdc /mnt/fedora32 Wrong. /dev/sdc1 or /dev/sdc2. Also you can do a pvscan and then check out what logical volumes you have and mount the volumes. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsub

New 64-bit Fedora Will Not Mount Similar 32-bit Filesystem

2012-11-04 Thread Alan Feuerbacher
Hi, This is my first post on this list, so please bear with me. I've been trying to get a new 64-bit Fedora 17 installation to recognize an older disk that contains a 32-bit installation. I had installed the 32-bit version on my older Intel-based machine, but recently decided to replace the mothe

"Please verify your user details" when trying to access a Windows 7 share

2012-11-04 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Running Windows 7 in a virtual machine, I shared a folder, publically. I told Windows to share it with "Everyone". Back in Fedora, I choose "Connect to server" option in the "Computer" window from the Gnome desktop, change the type to "Windows share", and enter the Win 7 VM's IP address.

Re: what broke chrome flash?

2012-11-04 Thread Mike Chambers
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 10:35 +, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 11/04/12 10:13, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 11/04/2012 05:41 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > >> On 11/03/12 13:30, Ed Greshko wrote: > >>> > >>> You could try reverting to google-chrome-stable. It is running just fine > >>> for me > >>> > >>

Re: what broke chrome flash?

2012-11-04 Thread Steve Underwood
On 11/04/2012 08:50 PM, Neal Becker wrote: I discovered that flash isn't broken at all. The issue is html5 on youtube. I opted-out of html5 trial, now everything is fine. I see many reports of html5 problems on youtube, so I guess it isn't me. The HTML5 support on youtube was working OK until

Re: what broke chrome flash?

2012-11-04 Thread Neal Becker
I discovered that flash isn't broken at all. The issue is html5 on youtube. I opted-out of html5 trial, now everything is fine. I see many reports of html5 problems on youtube, so I guess it isn't me. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription op

OT: Any way to mount a Netware 5 partition with Fedora?

2012-11-04 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Have a student that works for a company that just had the motherboard in there server go out. Disk is fine, but motherboard was very old and had an onboard scsi controller. Can see the driver and the DOS and Netware partition, but can not mount the Netware partition. Tried two other SCSI cont

Re: Cannot recognize HDD layout after a fresh installation of Windows 8

2012-11-04 Thread Luan Pham
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 14:10 +0800, 某因幡 wrote: > Hi, all. > I have a fresh installation of Windows 8. > HDD was parted as MBR, a reserved partition, NTFS C:/D: and the left > 200GB space was left unchanged. > Now I'm trying to install Fedora 17, using UltraISO burned the image > as USB HDD. > Then i

Re: what broke chrome flash?

2012-11-04 Thread Ed Greshko
Andrew Haley wrote: >On 11/04/12 10:13, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 11/04/2012 05:41 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: >>> On 11/03/12 13:30, Ed Greshko wrote: You could try reverting to google-chrome-stable. It is running >just fine for me >>> It didn't help me. Every time it tries to run

Re: what broke chrome flash?

2012-11-04 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/04/12 10:13, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 11/04/2012 05:41 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: >> On 11/03/12 13:30, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> >>> You could try reverting to google-chrome-stable. It is running just fine >>> for me >>> >> It didn't help me. Every time it tries to run anything flash, it immed

Re: what broke chrome flash?

2012-11-04 Thread Ed Greshko
On 11/04/2012 05:41 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 11/03/12 13:30, Ed Greshko wrote: >> >> You could try reverting to google-chrome-stable. It is running just fine >> for me >> > It didn't help me. Every time it tries to run anything flash, it immediately > crashes. > > google-chrome-stable.i3

Re: what broke chrome flash?

2012-11-04 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/03/12 13:30, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 11/03/2012 09:18 PM, Neal Becker wrote: >> f17. Was using nvidia + google-chrome-unstable. >> >> Somehow, today flash doesn't work. chrome about:plugins says: >> Adobe Flash Player - Version: 11.5.31.1 >> Shockwave Flash 11.5 r31 >> Name:Shockwave

Re: F17 : installin vmware-workstation 8.0.4 takes forever with 100% cpu

2012-11-04 Thread mike lan
Solved, I had to unisntall a previous vmware version first I've got a virtual machine made to work on vmware, I don't it will work on virtual box thanks On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Paul Smith wrote: > On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 1:43 PM, mike lan wrote: > > I'm installin vmware-workstation 8

Re: Bugzilla - Modeset - Kernel 3.4 to 3.6 upgrade no longer boots

2012-11-04 Thread Steve T
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 16:15 +, Steve T wrote: > Good afternoon, > I have been running my laptop on various versions of FC without a > problem and am currently on FC16 running Gnome 3 in full mode. > Recently the FC16 Kernel was updated from 3.4.11 to 3.6.2 and my > laptop (Dell Latitude D610 )

Re: new NetworkManager dependencies?

2012-11-04 Thread Ed Greshko
On 11/04/2012 01:33 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:\\ > > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Ed Greshko > > Are you saying that even if you > > systemctl disable NetworkManager.service > > it gives you problems? > > > Disabling doesn't prevent some other service from activating it again when i