On 22/10/12 07:55, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/22/2012 02:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Neither do Iin the inbox. Yet, if I "forward" the message in TBird I get
what Marko sees in the newly formed message Interesting...
Should have checked But if I view "message source" in TBird I also
On 10/22/2012 02:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Neither do Iin the inbox. Yet, if I "forward" the message in TBird I
> get what Marko sees in the newly formed message Interesting...
Should have checked But if I view "message source" in TBird I also see...
+ACMAIQ-/bin/bash
+ACM
+A
On 22 October 2012 07:21, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 22/10/12 07:06, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday, 21. October 2012. 19.21.02 Tim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> +ACMAIQ-/bin/bash
>>> +ACM
>>> +ACM force preloading of a 32 bit video for linux 1
>>> +ACM compatibility library for video
On 10/22/2012 02:21 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 22/10/12 07:06, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> On Sunday, 21. October 2012. 19.21.02 Tim wrote:
>>>
>>> +ACMAIQ-/bin/bash
>>> +ACM
>>> +ACM force preloading of a 32 bit video for linux 1
>>> +ACM compatibility library for video for linux
On 22/10/12 07:06, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Sunday, 21. October 2012. 19.21.02 Tim wrote:
+ACMAIQ-/bin/bash
+ACM
+ACM force preloading of a 32 bit video for linux 1
+ACM compatibility library for video for linux 2
LD+AF8-PRELOAD+AD0-/usr/lib/libv4l/v4l1compat.so skype
On Sunday, 21. October 2012. 19.21.02 Tim wrote:
>
>+ACMAIQ-/bin/bash
>+ACM
>+ACM force preloading of a 32 bit video for linux 1
>+ACM compatibility library for video for linux 2
>
>LD+AF8-PRELOAD+AD0-/usr/lib/libv4l/v4l1compat.so skype
What is this +A stuff?
> --
> +AFs-t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/22/2012 12:15 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 23:02 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 13:43:17 -0400, "Michael H. Warfield"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Now that being said, there's still some notable differen
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 23:02 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 13:43:17 -0400,
>"Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
> >
> >Now that being said, there's still some notable differences. Most of my
> >machines (some F16 and some F17, some i686 and some x86_64) came up with
> >p2p1
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 13:43:17 -0400,
"Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
Now that being said, there's still some notable differences. Most of my
machines (some F16 and some F17, some i686 and some x86_64) came up with
p2p1 for interface names and his is coming up em1. Obviously something
em1
On 10/08/2012 01:39 PM, Sergio wrote:
--- Em seg, 8/10/12, Rick Stevens escreveu:
De: Rick Stevens
Assunto: Re: OT was Re: installing Microsoft fonts: chkfontpath not found
Para: sergiocmailbox-userl...@yahoo.com.br, "Community support for Fedora users"
Data: Segunda-feira, 8 de Outubro d
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 02:53 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Michael H. Warfield
> wrote:
> > This is being directed to the systemd-devel community but I'm cc'ing the
> > lxc-users community and the Fedora community on this for their input as
> > well. I know it's no
On 10/21/2012 02:25 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
How do we work around this problem in systemd where it has hard coded
mounts in the binary that we can't override or configure? Or is it
there and I'm just missing it trying to examine the sources? That's how
I found where the problem lay.
Wh
Jim wrote:
> Fedora 17
>
> Apps won't start as SU , because they cannot connect to X server.
> I can echo $DISPLAY , I get :0.0 as SU.
use something like kdesu instead (or ssh -Y localhost or setup xauth
manually).
-- rex
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe o
Hi,
i've just downloaded F17 and i tried to install it on my computer x86
having a nVidia 8800 GT video card.
after seeing only the logo at boot process, now everything i can see is a
black screen :( and the Led of my monitor is blinking so it means no video
signal.
is there any compatibility issu
Hi,
I have an fc15 box and I'm having a problem with logwatch. I'm using
bzip2 for the compresscmd for logrotate, yet it somehow is giving the
compressed files a gz instead of bz2 extension. Logwatch uses this to
determine which command to use to read the compressed files, so it
therefore is using
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:13:32 -0600
JD wrote:
> # hdparm -d1 /dev/sr0
>
> /dev/sr0:
> setting using_dma to 1 (on)
> HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
> HDIO_GET_DMA failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
>
> So, could someone please advise how to enable DMA
> for the cd/d
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 19:05:36 +0200
Patrick Lists wrote:
> On 10/21/2012 06:59 PM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
> [snip]
> > I have not been following this closely, but it sure looks interesting.
> >
> > What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
>
> I'm not a developer but my g
Hello,
This is being directed to the systemd-devel community but I'm cc'ing the
lxc-users community and the Fedora community on this for their input as
well. I know it's not always good to cross post between multiple lists
but this is of interest to all three communities who may have valuable
inp
On Sat, 2012-10-20 at 21:01 -0600, JD wrote:
> On 10/20/2012 08:41 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 10:05 -0600, JD wrote:
> >> On 10/18/2012 09:16 AM, Tim wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 08:11 -0600, JD wrote:
> I assure you the MAC does match the MAC of the Etherne
On 10/22/2012 01:31 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 10/21/2012 09:59 AM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
http://lwn.net/Articles/517375/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayland_(display_server_protocol)
Wayland lacks a lot of features that e
On 10/21/2012 09:59 AM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
http://lwn.net/Articles/517375/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayland_(display_server_protocol)
Wayland lacks a lot of features that exist in X.org, currently. I think
the idea th
On 10/21/2012 07:06 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:59:26 +0200
Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
Loss of remote display capability? Destruction of compatibility
for tens of thousands of existing applications? But it is
shi
Mark LaPierre ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 21/10/2012
21:07:
On 10/21/2012 02:28 PM, antonio montagnani wrote:
antonio montagnani ha scritto / said the following il giorno/on
21/10/2012 20:06:
Today I shot some pictures with my DSLR, I transferred to my computer
and made
On 10/21/2012 02:28 PM, antonio montagnani wrote:
antonio montagnani ha scritto / said the following il giorno/on
21/10/2012 20:06:
Today I shot some pictures with my DSLR, I transferred to my computer
and made some work on them by the GIMP.
I loaded some images to my facebook account but wh
Fedora 17
Apps won't start as SU , because they cannot connect to X server.
I can echo $DISPLAY , I get :0.0 as SU.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedora
On 10/20/2012 09:31 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/21/2012 05:29 AM, Jim wrote:
On 10/20/2012 04:55 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Get rid of the PEERDNS setting.
Getting rid of the PEERDNS setting did not help..
PEERDNS=, where is one of the following:
yes — This interface will modify your system
Joe Zeff ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 21/10/2012 20:34:
On 10/21/2012 11:06 AM, antonio montagnani wrote:
Any idea???
Try Opera, Chrome or Seamonkey. Find out if it's Firefox itself or
something else.
It was my Firefox (and also Seamonkey): changing the value as per my
On 10/21/2012 11:06 AM, antonio montagnani wrote:
Any idea???
Try Opera, Chrome or Seamonkey. Find out if it's Firefox itself or
something else.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf
antonio montagnani ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on
21/10/2012 20:06:
Today I shot some pictures with my DSLR, I transferred to my computer
and made some work on them by the GIMP.
I loaded some images to my facebook account but when I see some image I
get some blueish colour. I
The most significant change wayland will bring over X is the ability to
softwares directly talking to hardwares instead of middlewares. Less hangup and
stuffs.
Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
Today I shot some pictures with my DSLR, I transferred to my computer
and made some work on them by the GIMP.
I loaded some images to my facebook account but when I see some image I
get some blueish colour. In Shotwell colours are fine, same as in the
Gimp: furthermore on a different computer
Christopher Svanefalk:
>> What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
Tom Horsley:
> Loss of remote display capability? Destruction of compatibility
> for tens of thousands of existing applications? But it is
> shiny and new and written from scratch, so obviously it
> is better.
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 15:24 +1030, Tim wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-10-20 at 22:41 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > Following his instructions, I ended up with this:
> >
> > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
> > ATTR{address}=="00:19:b9:13:a8:fc", NAME="eth0"
> Finding it hard to reme
On 10/21/2012 01:06 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:59:26 +0200
Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
Loss of remote display capability? Destruction of compatibility
for tens of thousands of existing applications? But it is
shin
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 19:05:36 +0200 Patrick Lists
wrote:
> On 10/21/2012 06:59 PM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
> [snip]
> > I have not been following this closely, but it sure looks interesting.
> >
> > What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
>
> I'm not a developer but my g
Bob Goodwin:
> Assuming the Newegg problem was due to an address change, should the
> Wildblue dns have caught up with it sooner?
That depends... DNS records have time-to-live data, that says how long
records should be cached for. So, if a website's record say cache me
for 15 days, then that's w
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:59:26 +0200
Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
> What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
Loss of remote display capability? Destruction of compatibility
for tens of thousands of existing applications? But it is
shiny and new and written from scratch, so obvio
On 10/21/2012 06:59 PM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
[snip]
I have not been following this closely, but it sure looks interesting.
What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
I'm not a developer but my guess is that X's 25 year old codebase is
dragging along a tremendous amou
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Patrick Lists <
fedora-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl> wrote:
> On 10/21/2012 09:10 AM, Junayeed Ahnaf wrote:
>
>> Well,
>>
>> Back in 2010 I heard f15 will feature experimental wayland support (from
>> Alan Jackson AKA ajax). Anyone knows what's the latest update on that
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 08:43 -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
> I recently came across something similar where Firefox and Chrome
> rendered the same page differently. The cause was not the browser but
> the page.
As well as not-so-brilliantly written pages, where authors haven't
really known what they'
10/21/2012 04:34 AM, mike lan wrote:
Hello
why is html/css display on fedora on firefox and google chrome alike is
different than on other os ? some times the size of a font can break the
display of a site which looks right on windows and not on fedora.
is there a way to work around this issue
On 10/21/2012 09:10 AM, Junayeed Ahnaf wrote:
Well,
Back in 2010 I heard f15 will feature experimental wayland support (from
Alan Jackson AKA ajax). Anyone knows what's the latest update on that
issue? Will we ever gonna see wayland replacing X?
The Wayland project is very much alive and well.
On 21/10/12 08:28, Tim wrote:
You are paying for a service. If they're not doing it right, or good
enough, it is fair to ask them to fix something up. If you have a
particular problem site, ask them about it.
Yes I will and do ask when I have trouble. When I do call tech
support they ac
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 11:34 +, mike lan wrote:
> why is html/css display on fedora on firefox and google chrome alike
> is different than on other os ? some times the size of a font can
> break the display of a site which looks right on windows and not on
> fedora.
>
> is there a way to work a
On 21/10/12 08:10, Junayeed Ahnaf wrote:
Well,
Back in 2010 I heard f15 will feature experimental wayland support (from
Alan Jackson AKA ajax). Anyone knows what's the latest update on that
issue? Will we ever gonna see wayland replacing X?
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:10:00 +1100
Junayeed Ahnaf wrote:
> Will we ever gonna see wayland replacing X?
Shhh! Don't give them ideas! :-).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guide
Bob Goodwin:
> All things considered, the ISP people are professionals, I am an
> amateur and it seems unlikely that I will beat them at their game.
> So what it boils down to is I am doing things for my own amusement,
> and just need to be careful not to leave the system in bad shape out
> of cons
On 21 October 2012 12:34, mike lan wrote:
> Hello
>
> why is html/css display on fedora on firefox and google chrome alike is
> different than on other os ? some times the size of a font can break the
> display of a site which looks right on windows and not on fedora.
>
> is there a way to work ar
Hello
why is html/css display on fedora on firefox and google chrome alike is
different than on other os ? some times the size of a font can break the
display of a site which looks right on windows and not on fedora.
is there a way to work around this issue by tweaking some settings on
firefox an
On 21/10/12 00:48, Tim wrote:
Bob Goodwin:
So it looks like my ISP is what it is and I probably can't change
things without degrading the service I have now which is quite good
then it works. Their are minor glitches that I have not been able to
assign the blame for, it occasionally requ
Hi,
Just a heads up, in case anyone else decides (against all sanity) to try
using Skype, *and* get a webcam working, on 64-bit Fedora 17, you get
stymied by:
Skype being only released in 32 bit
Skype wanting video for Linux 1
Fedora 17 uses video for Linux 2
Web pages offering advice
Well, Back in 2010 I heard f15 will feature experimental wayland support (from
Alan Jackson AKA ajax). Anyone knows what's the latest update on that issue?
Will we ever gonna see wayland replacing X?
Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor
--
users mailing list
users@li
52 matches
Mail list logo