On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 23:28:03 -0500
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Fedora User wrote:
>
> > I seem to be having a problem with any KDE application that has to
> > communicate with the world.
>
> I wonder if you're hitting some sort of ipv6'ism (or some other
> network connectivity issue).
>
> Does konquer
Hi,
I did a fresh install of F14 and x86_64 and i386
then immediately did a yum update on first boot.
x86_64 works but i368/i686 does not.
The errors from all mirrors is the same "Metadata file does not match
checksum" indicating it's not a local problem for them.
The problem is not limited
Fedora User wrote:
> I seem to be having a problem with any KDE application that has to
> communicate with the world.
I wonder if you're hitting some sort of ipv6'ism (or some other network
connectivity issue).
Does konqueror work to browse any websites? (or any other kde application
that acce
I seem to be having a problem with any KDE application that has to
communicate with the world.
1. KMyMoney refuses to update from my bank's server via OFX direct.
GnuCash shares the same AQbanking setup and works perfectly. That
doesn't help me convert two years of data.
2. Akregator refuses to
Hi
I'm suddenly getting "Metadata file does not match checksum" from a all
my mirror sites for various version of Fedora 12 thru 16
I need access to the older versions (mainly for Q/A testing).
Is there a way I can get YUM to exclude certain mirror sites?
I need redundancy so don't want to h
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 18:02 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Just a sign that the 2012 apocalypse is real :-).
I didn't realise that Windows 2012 had been released... ;-p
--
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.
--
users mailin
On 06/12/2012 04:26 PM, Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan wrote:
You need to address your otherwise legitimate complaint to the
developers of the Gnome shell.
However, don't expect them to pay much attention.
AIUI, the only thing the Gnome developers pay attention to is their own
mailing list. And, if
Andre Robatino writes:
Aaron Konstam sbcglobal.net> writes:
> I know that complaining with each successive version of Fedora gets
> annoying. But would someone tell me why the developers insist on retains
> the stupidity of having to hold down the alt key to get to the power off
> option.
>
>
Aaron Konstam writes:
I know that complaining with each successive version of Fedora gets
annoying. But would someone tell me why the developers insist on retains
the stupidity of having to hold down the alt key to get to the power off
option.
It is certainly a stupid feature and it continues o
Mateusz Marzantowicz writes:
I've just installed Fedora 17 (x86_64) on my Dell XPS 8300 with Intel
Core i7-2600 and I noticed a very strange behavior: CPU and/or
motherboard fans are constantly working at very high speed which makes a
lot of noise (fan speed is at the same level it was right aft
Aaron Konstam cried out:
I know that complaining with each successive version of Fedora gets
annoying. But would someone tell me why the developers insist on
retains the stupidity of having to hold down the alt key to get to
the power off option.
That behavior is a feature of the Gnome sh
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> I have a large number of entries in /boot/grub2/grub.cfg under Fedora-17,
>> eg -
>> menuentry 'Fedora Linux, with Linux 3.3.2-6.fc16.i686' --class
>> fedora --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os $menuentry_id_option
>>
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:05:17 +0100
Ian Malone wrote:
> You do realise you can install the extension to add it right now? That
> said I'm glad they've finally seen sense on one issue.
Just a sign that the 2012 apocalypse is real :-).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
I've seen a similar problem with yumex after updates.
Only way I get it to work is to use su.
su -
yumex --root
It runs fine then, but does give an error about the back end when
closing.
On 12 Jun 2012 at 14:41, don fisher wrote:
Date sent: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:41:27 -0700
From:
I am running f16 with updates applied a couple of weeks ago. I tried to
run yumex to see what ne packages might be available. I received the
following:
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/guihelpers/__init__.py:256: GtkWarning:
gtk_scrolled_window_add(): cannot add non scrollable widget use
gtk_
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:23:57 -0700
"Wolfgang S. Rupprecht" wrote:
>
> Steve Searle writes:
> > Around 11:05pm on Monday, June 11, 2012 (UK time), Wolfgang
> > S. Rupprecht scrawled:
> >
> >> Sadly, before Fedora Smolt went down, it still showed more 32-bit
> >> than 64-bit installs. Fedora doe
On 12 June 2012 21:54, Dokuro wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Andre Robatino
> wrote:
>> Aaron Konstam sbcglobal.net> writes:
>>
>>> I know that complaining with each successive version of Fedora gets
>>> annoying. But would someone tell me why the developers insist on retains
>>> the
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Dokuro wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Andre Robatino
> wrote:
>> Aaron Konstam sbcglobal.net> writes:
>>
>>> I know that complaining with each successive version of Fedora gets
>>> annoying. But would someone tell me why the developers insist on retain
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> Aaron Konstam sbcglobal.net> writes:
>
>> I know that complaining with each successive version of Fedora gets
>> annoying. But would someone tell me why the developers insist on retains
>> the stupidity of having to hold down the alt key to
Aaron Konstam sbcglobal.net> writes:
> I know that complaining with each successive version of Fedora gets
> annoying. But would someone tell me why the developers insist on retains
> the stupidity of having to hold down the alt key to get to the power off
> option.
>
> It is certainly a stupid
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 07:59 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> Suddenly Evolution seems unable to remember the pop and smtp paswswds..
> Has any one else had this problem and know how to fix this?
It wasn't evolution but AT&T's pop server that went screwy.
>
--
===
I know that complaining with each successive version of Fedora gets
annoying. But would someone tell me why the developers insist on retains
the stupidity of having to hold down the alt key to get to the power off
option.
It is certainly a stupid feature and it continues on with its stupidity.
Ok,
I've just installed Fedora 17 (x86_64) on my Dell XPS 8300 with Intel
Core i7-2600 and I noticed a very strange behavior: CPU and/or
motherboard fans are constantly working at very high speed which makes a
lot of noise (fan speed is at the same level it was right after powering
on).
I previously h
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 10:26 -0430, Dokuro wrote:
> 6. AMD/Ati gets worse...
I didn't use the proprietary drivers in previous Fedora releases for my
ATI HD 3850. I stuck with the open source 2D drivers with which desktop
performance was great. Gnome shell was nice and snappy. HD vids were
butter
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:58:08 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Brand names and model numbers are meaningless to me, not having owned a
> brand-name desktop machine since 1987 and always assembling my own.
Well, that's one of the differences, doubtless the many
differences, between you and
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On the plus side:
>
> 1. Intel graphics are much improved (weird artifacts are finally
> gone in games like neverputt and neverball).
>
> On the minus side:
>
> 1. USB Wi-Fi dongle not working as access point
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
On 12.06.2012 15:23, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I have a large number of entries in /boot/grub2/grub.cfg under Fedora-17, eg
> -
> menuentry 'Fedora Linux, with Linux 3.3.2-6.fc16.i686' --class
> fedora --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os $menuentry_id
On the plus side:
1. Intel graphics are much improved (weird artifacts are finally
gone in games like neverputt and neverball).
On the minus side:
1. USB Wi-Fi dongle not working as access point
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828824
This one has come and gone several times
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/12/2012 09:34 AM, Pete Stieber wrote:
> On 6/11/2012 6:40 PM, Jeff Gipson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 04:08:47PM -0700, Pete Stieber wrote:
>>> I'm trying to setup a git server on a Fedora 17 box. I created user
>>> name git and setup bare
On 06/11/2012 07:08 PM, PS = Pete Stieber wrote:
PS>> I'm trying to setup a git server on a Fedora
PS>> 17 box. I created user name git and setup
PS>> bare Git repos under /home/git/repos. When
PS>> I clone these repos from another machine using
PS>>
PS>> $ git clone git@server_name/repos/RepoN
On 6/11/2012 6:40 PM, Jeff Gipson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 04:08:47PM -0700, Pete Stieber wrote:
I'm trying to setup a git server on a Fedora 17 box. I created user
name git and setup bare Git repos under /home/git/repos. When I clone
these repos from another machine using
$ git clone git
I have a large number of entries in /boot/grub2/grub.cfg under Fedora-17, eg
-
menuentry 'Fedora Linux, with Linux 3.3.2-6.fc16.i686' --class
fedora --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os $menuentry_id_option
'gnulinux-3.3.2-6.fc16.i686-advanced-185af
Suddenly Evolution seems unable to remember the pop and smtp paswswds..
Has any one else had this problem and know how to fix this?
--
===
Philogyny recapitulates erogeny; erogeny recapitulates philogyny.
=
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 04:33 -0400, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 11:27 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Far from it. x32 is designed for performance. There are many applications
> > where the additional space occupied by 64bit pointers is a measurable
> > performance hit, but you still want to use th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/11/2012 07:08 PM, Pete Stieber wrote:
> I'm trying to setup a git server on a Fedora 17 box. I created user name
> git and setup bare Git repos under /home/git/repos. When I clone these
> repos from another machine using
>
> $ git clone git@s
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Frank Elsner
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> anyone with a solution to my problem?
>
> Problem:
>
> Fedora 14, GNOME2 "Add to panel" does nothing, in particular:
>
> Applications -> Sound&Video > Audacity, right click, "Ads this launcher to
> panel"
> gives no result, the icon
On 06/11/2012 11:27 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> Far from it. x32 is designed for performance. There are many applications
> where the additional space occupied by 64bit pointers is a measurable
> performance hit, but you still want to use the 64bit features of the CPU
> in all other respects.
It's prett
37 matches
Mail list logo
