On 05/26/2012 06:45 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Don't think it's you, although it doesn't seem to be universal. Some
hardware seems to trigger a different output from the blkid calc,
while most work. That's only based on three upgrades, two worked fine,
one did as you say, haven't gotten to buil
Alex wrote:
Hi,
If I were to install an F17 beta at this point, instead of waiting for
the release next week, would it be possible to upgrade that beta to
the production version once it is actually released?
I started with fc17alpha and have upgraded to whatever was current this morning.
You c
JD wrote:
The pertinent failure message in both of these kernels is:
[ 29.653980] dracut Warning: No root device
"block:/dev/disk/by-uuid/03f82b3c-5163-465b-a4c3-3bcb349a1cc4" found
[ 29.654857] dracut: + emergency_shell No root device
"block:/dev/disk/by-uuid/03f82b3c-5163-465b-a4c3-3bcb349a1cc
I found this link too.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_from_pre-release_to_final
-
On 05/26/2012 08:46 PM, NRL wrote:
I found this link about upgrading. I hope this helps.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading
---
I found this link about upgrading. I hope this helps.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading
-
On 05/26/2012 08:38 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
If I were to install an F17 beta at this point, instead of waiting for
the
On 5/26/2012 8:38 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I were to install an F17 beta at this point, instead of waiting for
> the release next week, would it be possible to upgrade that beta to
> the production version once it is actually released?
Get RC4. That would be as close as you can get to Fedora
Hi,
If I were to install an F17 beta at this point, instead of waiting for
the release next week, would it be possible to upgrade that beta to
the production version once it is actually released?
Thanks,
Alex
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscripti
On 05/26/2012 04:13 PM, JD wrote:
blkid /dev/sda2 yields the same id that
kernel-3.3.5-2.fc16.i686 and kernel-3.3.6-3.fc16.i686
are unable to mount.
So, it seems a different uuid was generated and placed
in the boot/grub2/grub.cfg file when the update was done.
Modifying /boot/grub2/grug.cfg t
On 05/26/2012 01:25 PM, JD wrote:
The pertinent failure message in both of these kernels is:
[ 29.653980] dracut Warning: No root device
"block:/dev/disk/by-uuid/03f82b3c-5163-465b-a4c3-3bcb349a1cc4" found
[ 29.654857] dracut: + emergency_shell No root device
"block:/dev/disk/by-uuid/03f82
please guys, start your private flamefest and leave us alone
2012/5/26 Reindl Harald :
>
> Am 26.05.2012 13:50, schrieb Heinz Diehl:
>> On 26.05.2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
Why do you think it's wrong?
>>
>>> it is wrong
>>
>> This discussion ends here for me. Your claims and statements tot
On 5/25/2012 9:41 PM, Jeff Field wrote:
Hello,
I'm attempting to use a Wildcard SSL certificate for my domain with
389ds. The certificate and the CA (godaddy) intermediate cert import
fine into both the admin server and the directory server, but attempts
to use an LDAPS:// URI with ldapmodify
On 26.05.2012, JD wrote:
> Bug ID 822792 at bugzilla.redhat.com is about this problem.
> However, I am stuck booting kernel-3.3.4-3.fc16.i686 which does not have
> this problem.
JFYI: all of the vanilla 3.3.x kernels boot just fine, with dracut
behaving as it should. Maybe the failure is related
The pertinent failure message in both of these kernels is:
[ 29.653980] dracut Warning: No root device
"block:/dev/disk/by-uuid/03f82b3c-5163-465b-a4c3-3bcb349a1cc4" found
[ 29.654857] dracut: + emergency_shell No root device
"block:/dev/disk/by-uuid/03f82b3c-5163-465b-a4c3-3bcb349a1cc4" fo
2012-05-26 06:32 keltezéssel, Sam Varshavchik írta:
Ed Greshko writes:
On 05/26/2012 11:50 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Maybe a silly question, but do you have the hplip packages installed?
>
> I don't have that printerbut when I go to http://localhost:631/ and go
through
> the process to modif
Am 26.05.2012 13:50, schrieb Heinz Diehl:
> On 26.05.2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>>> Why do you think it's wrong?
>
>> it is wrong
>
> This discussion ends here for me. Your claims and statements totally
> lack any evidence, which means that it's a waste of time to read
> any further.
please
On 26.05.2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Why do you think it's wrong?
> it is wrong
This discussion ends here for me. Your claims and statements totally
lack any evidence, which means that it's a waste of time to read
any further.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
Am 26.05.2012 11:41, schrieb Heinz Diehl:
> Millions of small notebooks with 1 GB RAM have been sold,
> because they are small, able to run many hours solely on batteri,
> and because a lot of people don't have the money to buy something more
> expensive. In other words: they are quite common, an
On 05/26/2012 04:59 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 05/26/2012 12:32 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> ...
>>> Now, if hp-setup could only tell me what it downloaded, and where it dumped
>>> whatever it loaded on the filesystem…
>> Hey, it is proprietary so why should they tell y
On 26.05.2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
> and even if - machines with 1 GB RAM are loughable
> these days since i remember that a yum-upgrade was
> killed with a OOM om a virtual machine witout GUI
Millions of small notebooks with 1 GB RAM have been sold,
because they are small, able to run many hou
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 05/26/2012 12:32 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
...
>> Now, if hp-setup could only tell me what it downloaded, and where it dumped
>> whatever it loaded on the filesystem…
>
> Hey, it is proprietary so why should they tell you? :-)
...
# whereis hp-setup
hp-setup: /usr/bin/hp-
Am 26.05.2012 07:45, schrieb Joel Rees:
>>> Do you understand the reason you still set up swap, even though your
>>> entire workload working set fits into RAM?
>>
>> there is no single reason if you have enough RAM
>
> In an ideal world, RAM would not consume energy.
>
> This is a real world, w
21 matches
Mail list logo
