Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/11 21:15, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 05/17/2011 11:36 PM, JD wrote: >> TKIP is the feeble one. >> Two researchers in Japan busted TKIP in less than one minute >> using an ordinary PC. > You are correct. I just went and looked at my wireless router, and I'm > using AES. I remember hea

Re: Protected WLAN

On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 03:55 +, g wrote: > On 05/18/2011 03:09 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > <> > > > WEP is known to be vulnerable. WPA has some weaknesses in some > > circumstances. WPA2 however is thought to be secure if you use a > > hard-to-guess password. > > as you say *thought to be

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/2011 11:36 PM, JD wrote: > TKIP is the feeble one. > Two researchers in Japan busted TKIP in less than one minute > using an ordinary PC. You are correct. I just went and looked at my wireless router, and I'm using AES. I remember hearing about how feeble TKIP was 4 years ago, and imme

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/18/2011 03:36 AM, James McKenzie wrote: <> > The first part of security is knowing what NOT TO do, not what TO do. this is one point that too many fail at, and in such, set up a weak system. once you *think* you have a secure system, it is time to test with all the tools you have available

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/18/2011 03:09 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: <> > WEP is known to be vulnerable. WPA has some weaknesses in some > circumstances. WPA2 however is thought to be secure if you use a > hard-to-guess password. as you say *thought to be secure*. > A quick look at Wikipedia could have told you

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/2011 12:36 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: > > Also if it's your home wLan, hide it, don't broadcast the ssid. > So those in your neighbourhood won't even know you have a wireless. > As many have pointed out - you should not disable SSID broadcast. Disabling it offers zero security benefit

Re: Protected WLAN

On 5/17/11 6:20 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > I didn't say that cracking wpa2-ps/aes is easy. I was saying that, > whatever > the security algorithm you are trying to crack, having a hidden SSID and > filtered MAC is not going to make it *any* harder than having a public SSID > and > no MAC filter

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/11 20:16, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 05/17/2011 09:53 PM, JD wrote: >> Well, I hate to disappoint anyone, but until >> I see a credible security researchers/professors >> show in a scientific publication that they >> were able to crack wpa2-psk/AES using PC's >> and in reasonable time (

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/18/2011 01:53 AM, JD wrote: <> > Well, I hate to disappoint anyone, but until I see a credible security > researchers/professors show in a scientific publication that they > were able to crack wpa2-psk/AES using PC's and in reasonable time > (say a few days), then I would believe it. Youtu

Re: Protected WLAN

On 5/17/11 2:01 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/17/11 12:23, Marko Vojinovic wrote: >> On Tuesday 17 May 2011 19:47:24 JD wrote: >>> On 05/17/11 11:23, Steve Searle wrote: Around 07:16pm on Tuesday, May 17, 2011 (UK time), JD scrawled: > Right. Also, it is not necessarily "neighbours" that are adjac

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/2011 09:53 PM, JD wrote: > Well, I hate to disappoint anyone, but until > I see a credible security researchers/professors > show in a scientific publication that they > were able to crack wpa2-psk/AES using PC's > and in reasonable time (say a few days), then > I would believe it. Youtube

Re: Protected WLAN

On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 01:07 +, g wrote: > On 05/17/2011 11:44 PM, JD wrote: > <> > > > You call youtube a credible publication? > > yes/no. > > they do have all different ways of cracking wep, wpa, and wpa2 > that are mentioned in this thread. WEP is known to be vulnerable. WPA has some wea

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/2011 09:30 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > 18.05.2011, 00:39, "Joe Zeff": >> > Just out of curiosity, how would a phrase in a language that's not >> > natively written in the Latin alphabet do? > It didn't work at all. I mean it didn't even take it as a setting. Don't try to enter it in it

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/2011 09:20 AM, JD wrote: > Good question. You have to ask a computer > geek who speaks that language :) > > But seriously, just about all languages have > an alphabet and they use computer with the > locale set to that alphbet. Probably some alphabets > are coded in UTF8 and others in UTF1

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/11 18:07, g wrote: > On 05/17/2011 11:44 PM, JD wrote: > <> > >> You call youtube a credible publication? > yes/no. > > they do have all different ways of cracking wep, wpa, and wpa2 > that are mentioned in this thread. > > just a few from my bookmarks, which where easy to find via a littl

RE: Amazing Linux victory!

Awesome and congrats! I too would be interested in hearing about functionality testing---seeing what successes you get. Joe -Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Tom Horsley Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 19

Re: Amazing Linux victory!

On Wed, 18 May 2011 11:23:59 +1000 Chris Smart wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > > I just hooked up a Dell Zino HD via hdmi to a vizio HD TV > > and no power on earth seemed to be able to get the desktop > > to display at full width and height 1920x1080 resolution > >

Re: Amazing Linux victory!

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > I just hooked up a Dell Zino HD via hdmi to a vizio HD TV > and no power on earth seemed to be able to get the desktop > to display at full width and height 1920x1080 resolution > with the ATI video that comes with it in Windows 7. How is the

Re: Protected WLAN

On Tuesday 17 May 2011 22:01:11 JD wrote: > On 05/17/11 12:23, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > On Tuesday 17 May 2011 19:47:24 JD wrote: > >> On 05/17/11 11:23, Steve Searle wrote: > >>> Around 07:16pm on Tuesday, May 17, 2011 (UK time), JD scrawled: > Right. Also, it is not necessarily "neighbours

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/2011 11:44 PM, JD wrote: <> > You call youtube a credible publication? yes/no. they do have all different ways of cracking wep, wpa, and wpa2 that are mentioned in this thread. just a few from my bookmarks, which where easy to find via a little google time; http://www.youtube.com/wa

Re: security in firefox4

On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 23:38 +0100, Sam Sharpe wrote: > On 17 May 2011 21:35, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > I read somewhere that Firefox 4 contains a feature that prevents > > websites from grabbing your local information. If that is true could > > some on tell me how to activate this feature in Firefo

Amazing Linux victory!

I just hooked up a Dell Zino HD via hdmi to a vizio HD TV and no power on earth seemed to be able to get the desktop to display at full width and height 1920x1080 resolution with the ATI video that comes with it in Windows 7. Wondering if this was a vizio problem or a driver problem, I booted a li

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/11 15:29, g wrote: > On 05/17/2011 09:01 PM, JD wrote: > <> > >> Too much bluster here. >> >> Show us any credible publication that claims wpa2-ps/AES has been >> easily cracked or even cracked at all. > so, you say you have not been on youtube lately? > > You call youtube a credible publi

Re: security in firefox4

On 17 May 2011 21:35, Aaron Konstam wrote: > I read somewhere that Firefox 4 contains a feature that prevents > websites from grabbing your local information. If that is true could > some on tell me how to activate this feature in Firefox 4 If you mean "Do Not Track", then that would be this: To

Re: Protected WLAN

> Obtaining a MAC takes seconds - i.e. no more 'work' than it is to find > your 'hidden' SSID. > > These snake oil methods of wireless security need to simply die. Seconded, and the arguments about it needing technical knowledge don't really work any more because tools for old style wireless, a

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/2011 09:01 PM, JD wrote: <> > Too much bluster here. > > Show us any credible publication that claims wpa2-ps/AES has been > easily cracked or even cracked at all. so, you say you have not been on youtube lately? -- peace out. tc.hago, g . in a free world without fences, who

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/11 12:23, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Tuesday 17 May 2011 19:47:24 JD wrote: >> On 05/17/11 11:23, Steve Searle wrote: >>> Around 07:16pm on Tuesday, May 17, 2011 (UK time), JD scrawled: Right. Also, it is not necessarily "neighbours" that are adjacent you your house or a few hou

security in firefox4

I read somewhere that Firefox 4 contains a feature that prevents websites from grabbing your local information. If that is true could some on tell me how to activate this feature in Firefox 4 -- === If we could sell our experience

IMPORTANT - Fedora Project Contributor Agreement Signing Window Is Open

Please take a moment and read this brief email, as it is important. Fedora is in the process of retiring our old "Individual Contributor License Agreement" (also known as the ICLA or CLA) and replacing it with the new Fedora Project Contributor Agreement (FPCA). All Fedora contributors with accou

Re: Protected WLAN

On Tuesday 17 May 2011 20:15:24 James McKenzie wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > James, why are you attempting to justify this pointless, unsecure, > > method of wireless configuration? > > > > SSID hiding is *not* secure. It is *not* a deterrent. Security

Re: [389-users] db import failure, when setting replication up

1.2.8.2 -Reinhard From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Noriko Hosoi Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 2:16 PM To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. Subject: Re: [389-

Re: Protected WLAN

On Tuesday 17 May 2011 19:47:24 JD wrote: > On 05/17/11 11:23, Steve Searle wrote: > > Around 07:16pm on Tuesday, May 17, 2011 (UK time), JD scrawled: > >> Right. Also, it is not necessarily "neighbours" that are adjacent > >> you your house or a few houses down. Someone can park a car > >> not far

Re: Protected WLAN

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > James McKenzie wrote: >> True.  Bet you have a lock on every door to your house as well. >> Turning off the SSID is a deterent.  Make them go somewhere else. >> Same with door locks.  If I want to get into your house, I will.  Even >>

Re: Protected WLAN

On Tuesday 17 May 2011 19:54:39 Marko Vojinovic wrote: > For security you need to implement some WPA-related stuff and a strong > firewall, possibly with MAC-filtering etc. Umm, I was distracted by alien ship landing in my back yard when I wrote this, sorry. Please forget the MAC-filtering part..

Re: Protected WLAN

On Tuesday 17 May 2011 18:11:03 James McKenzie wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > > On 17/05/11 14:30, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > >> Which WLAN protection method would you recommend? > >> * Shared key > >> * WPA-Personal > >> * WPA2-Personal > > > > Also if it's your ho

Re: About start system without X in Fedora 15

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:49 PM, JB wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd#Boot_Kernel_Command_Line Thank you all. This is just what I'm looking for ;-) -- --- Have a nice day  ;-) TooManySecrets /"\  

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/11 11:23, Steve Searle wrote: > Around 07:16pm on Tuesday, May 17, 2011 (UK time), JD scrawled: > >> Right. Also, it is not necessarily "neighbours" that are adjacent >> you your house or a few houses down. Someone can park a car >> not far from your house, and using the type of home-made

Re: Protected WLAN

James McKenzie wrote: > True. Bet you have a lock on every door to your house as well. > Turning off the SSID is a deterent. Make them go somewhere else. > Same with door locks. If I want to get into your house, I will. Even > if it means using TNT. James, why are you attempting to justify thi

Re: Protected WLAN

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Steve Searle wrote: > Around 07:16pm on Tuesday, May 17, 2011 (UK time), JD scrawled: > >> Right. Also, it is not necessarily "neighbours" that are adjacent >> you your house or a few houses down. Someone can park a car >> not far from your house, and using the ty

Re: Protected WLAN

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Tim wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 17:36 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: >> Also if it's your home wLan, hide it, don't broadcast the ssid. >> So those in your neighbourhood won't even know you have a wireless. > > Completely pointless: > >  Your device is transmitting

Re: Protected WLAN

Around 07:16pm on Tuesday, May 17, 2011 (UK time), JD scrawled: > Right. Also, it is not necessarily "neighbours" that are adjacent > you your house or a few houses down. Someone can park a car > not far from your house, and using the type of home-made antenna > James mentioned, they can hack your

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/11 11:08, James McKenzie wrote: > 2011/5/17 Misha Shnurapet: >> 18.05.2011, 02:11, "James McKenzie": >>> The next step is MAC restricting and a lot more. However, just >>> employing security and hidden SSID is a great start. Most people do >>> not do this. >> I won't use a whitelist filt

Re: [389-users] db import failure, when setting replication up

It looks to me you have hit this bug... Which version of 389-ds-base you are running? *Bug 684996* -Exported tombstone cannot be imported correctly. The patch should be in the version 1.2.8.2. Thanks, --noriko On 05/17/2011 11:03 AM,

Re: Protected WLAN

On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 17:36 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > Also if it's your home wLan, hide it, don't broadcast the ssid. > So those in your neighbourhood won't even know you have a wireless. Completely pointless: Your device is transmitting something, this is detectable. And it does so several

Re: Protected WLAN

2011/5/17 Misha Shnurapet : > 18.05.2011, 02:11, "James McKenzie" : >> The next step is MAC restricting and a lot more.  However, just >> employing security and hidden SSID is a great start.  Most people do >> not do this. > > I won't use a whitelist filter so I don't get locked out on a coincidenc

[389-users] db import failure, when setting replication up

Hi, I have seen the following: I set 2 systems up in MMR. Replication worked. For some reason, I needed to take one of the boxes out of the replication and disabled replication. Later on, I enabled it again and created the shadowing agreement to the other box. Now, I saw the following errors d

Re: Protected WLAN

18.05.2011, 02:39, "JD" : > You understand that both the access point and the computer > have to have the same settings? > i.e. wpa2-psk, AES and the same 63 character string as the > passphrase. > > And is you router using MAC address filtering to grant access? > If so, you will need to add the MA

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/11 09:30, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > 18.05.2011, 00:21, "JD": >> I would select wpa2-personal, and select AES Encryption. >> Be sure that you create a passphrase that is 64 characters. >> and is made of a random string of printable characters. > Checking WPA2... done. > Checking AES... done.

Re: About start system without X in Fedora 15

On 05/17/2011 11:13 AM, "Manuel Trujillo (TooManySecrets)" wrote: > Before systemd, you could start a system without the X putting a "3" > at end of kernel line in grub. How I can make the same in Fedora 15? I > tried the same but not work (I think it is for the new systemd start > system). A q

Re: Protected WLAN

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 17/05/11 14:30, Misha Shnurapet wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Which WLAN protection method would you recommend? >> * Shared key >> * WPA-Personal >> * WPA2-Personal >> >> My router also supports Radius with 802.1x and WPA/WPA2-Enterprise, but >> the

Re: Protected WLAN

On 17/05/11 14:30, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > Hi. > > Which WLAN protection method would you recommend? > * Shared key > * WPA-Personal > * WPA2-Personal > > My router also supports Radius with 802.1x and WPA/WPA2-Enterprise, but these > require strange stuff like certificates that leave me clueless

Re: Protected WLAN

18.05.2011, 00:21, "JD" : > I would select wpa2-personal, and select AES Encryption. > Be sure that you create a passphrase that is 64 characters. > and is made of a random string of printable characters. Checking WPA2... done. Checking AES... done. A passphrase of 63 mixed case letters and specia

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/11 08:39, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 05/17/2011 08:21 AM, JD wrote: >> I would select wpa2-personal, and select AES Encryption. >> Be sure that you create a passphrase that is 64 characters. >> and is made of a random string of printable characters. >> > Just out of curiosity, how would a phrase

Re: [389-users] 389ds Log analysis

On 05/17/2011 07:35 AM, Roland Schwingel wrote: Hi... Maybe a silly question but is there a tool/possibility to help in analyzing dirsrv log files (/opt/dirsrv/var/log/dirsrv/slapd-/access)? My LDAP Server is getting a lot of queries. But I am interested in filtering out the queries of a ce

Re: Adblock Plus add-on for FireFox

On 05/17/2011 03:22 PM, JD wrote: > On 05/17/11 07:59, g wrote: <> >> interesting. but that still does not answer about 'privoxy' as ' synergy' >> is not found in search from firefox add-on page. :) > It is a package outside firefox's add-ons. thank you. frank murphy filled in the details. --

Re: Adblock Plus add-on for FireFox

On 05/17/2011 03:01 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 17/05/11 15:59, g wrote: >> On 05/17/2011 06:06 AM, JD wrote: >>> On 05/16/11 22:55, g wrote: you could send a link when you recommend something. > > www.provoxy.net thank you, frank. > yum install privoxy so, it is a fedora and yum install

Re: [off-list]

On 05/17/2011 03:03 PM, Joe Wulf wrote: > g > > :) > > I couldn't help but notice, now, your signature lines. I'm delighted! glad you enjoyed them. > A coworker has the following I thought I'd share with you. > > "The installation instructions stated to install Windows 2000 or better. I > insta

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/2011 08:21 AM, JD wrote: > I would select wpa2-personal, and select AES Encryption. > Be sure that you create a passphrase that is 64 characters. > and is made of a random string of printable characters. > Just out of curiosity, how would a phrase in a language that's not natively writte

Re: [389-users] 389ds Log analysis

2011/5/17 Roland Schwingel : > Maybe a silly question but is there a tool/possibility to help in analyzing > dirsrv log files (/opt/dirsrv/var/log/dirsrv/slapd-/access)? See attachment. Probably needs some perldocs added. Jeremy dslogdelve Description: Binary data -- 389 users mailing list 389-

Re: Adblock Plus add-on for FireFox

On 05/17/11 07:59, g wrote: > On 05/17/2011 06:06 AM, JD wrote: >> On 05/16/11 22:55, g wrote: >>> you could send a link when you recommend something. >>> >> privoxy and tor work in synergy to give you >> a way to hide you true IP or proxy it altogether. > interesting. but that still does not answe

Re: Protected WLAN

On 05/17/11 06:30, Misha Shnurapet wrote: > Hi. > > Which WLAN protection method would you recommend? > * Shared key > * WPA-Personal > * WPA2-Personal > > My router also supports Radius with 802.1x and WPA/WPA2-Enterprise, but these > require strange stuff like certificates that leave me clueless

Re: F14 Apt protect pkg?

On 05/16/2011 10:00 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: > Is there a way to prevent a pkg from being deleted accidentaly when > using apt. > > With yum you can use a conf file. > > Anyone how to use it with apt > > checked man apt, man apt_prefrences > also googled, some Ubuntu solutions. > You can add packag

Re: Networking problem

On 05/17/11 04:25, JB wrote: > Tom H gmail.com> writes: > >> ... >>> Let's try a ping from Fedora to Powerbook. >>> >>> snip >>> >>> But, the situation is curious, because we have ping's IPv4-format packet >>> with >>> FROM IPv4 address and TO IPv4 address going out thru IPv6-type interface >> I

Re: Adblock Plus add-on for FireFox

On 05/17/11 02:28, Alan Cox wrote: >> I was hoping for an implementation of java >> that would indeed enforce the sandbox principle >> and prevent all websites from sending scripts that >> try to jump out of the sandbox. > The standard java and javascript in the web browser enforces the sandbox > (

[off-list]

g :) I couldn't help but notice, now, your signature lines. I'm delighted! A coworker has the following I thought I'd share with you. "The installation instructions stated to install Windows 2000 or better. I installed Linux." R, -Joe > in a free world without fences, who needs gates. >

Re: Adblock Plus add-on for FireFox

On 17/05/11 15:59, g wrote: > On 05/17/2011 06:06 AM, JD wrote: >> On 05/16/11 22:55, g wrote: > >>> you could send a link when you recommend something. >>> www.provoxy.net yum install privoxy -- Regards, Frank Murphy UTF_8 Encoded Friend of Fedora -- users mailing list users@lists.fedorapro

Re: Adblock Plus add-on for FireFox

On 05/17/2011 06:06 AM, JD wrote: > On 05/16/11 22:55, g wrote: >> you could send a link when you recommend something. >> > privoxy and tor work in synergy to give you > a way to hide you true IP or proxy it altogether. interesting. but that still does not answer about 'privoxy' as ' synergy' is

[389-users] 389ds Log analysis

Hi... Maybe a silly question but is there a tool/possibility to help in analyzing dirsrv log files (/opt/dirsrv/var/log/dirsrv/slapd-/access)? My LDAP Server is getting a lot of queries. But I am interested in filtering out the queries of a certain host to analyze them. This can be quite a pai

Protected WLAN

Hi. Which WLAN protection method would you recommend? * Shared key * WPA-Personal * WPA2-Personal My router also supports Radius with 802.1x and WPA/WPA2-Enterprise, but these require strange stuff like certificates that leave me clueless. :) -- Best regards, Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Co

Re: What F15 Repos should I have enabled.

On Tue, 17 May 2011 09:01:34 PM Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2011 20:44:47 +1000, AIS wrote: > > What F15 Repos should I have enabled at this stage of the upgrade > > process? > > I just checked and I have: > > Fedora 15 -i386 > > RPM Fusion for Fedora Rawhide -Free > > RPM Fusion for F

Re: About start system without X in Fedora 15

Manuel Trujillo (TooManySecrets toomany.net> writes: > > Hi. > > Before systemd, you could start a system without the X putting a "3" > at end of kernel line in grub. How I can make the same in Fedora 15? I > tried the same but not work (I think it is for the new systemd start > system). > > P

Re: Networking problem

Tom H gmail.com> writes: > ... > > Let's try a ping from Fedora to Powerbook. > > > > snip > > > > But, the situation is curious, because we have ping's IPv4-format packet > > with > > FROM IPv4 address and TO IPv4 address going out thru IPv6-type interface > > If you're referring to "192.168.1

Re: What F15 Repos should I have enabled.

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 20:44:47 +1000, Anthony Irven Scott wrote: > What F15 Repos should I have enabled at this stage of the upgrade > process? > I just checked and I have: > Fedora 15 -i386 > RPM Fusion for Fedora Rawhide -Free > RPM Fusion for Fedora Rawhide -Nonfree > Fedora 15 -i386 -Upda

Re: What F15 Repos should I have enabled.

On Tue, 17 May 2011 20:44:47 +1000, AIS wrote: > What F15 Repos should I have enabled at this stage of the upgrade > process? > I just checked and I have: > Fedora 15 -i386 > RPM Fusion for Fedora Rawhide -Free > RPM Fusion for Fedora Rawhide -Nonfree > Fedora 15 -i386 -Updates > > Could someone

What F15 Repos should I have enabled.

What F15 Repos should I have enabled at this stage of the upgrade process? I just checked and I have: Fedora 15 -i386 RPM Fusion for Fedora Rawhide -Free RPM Fusion for Fedora Rawhide -Nonfree Fedora 15 -i386 -Updates Could someone point me in the right direction please. -- users mailing list us

About start system without X in Fedora 15

Hi. Before systemd, you could start a system without the X putting a "3" at end of kernel line in grub. How I can make the same in Fedora 15? I tried the same but not work (I think it is for the new systemd start system). Please, excuse me my bad english. Regards. -- --

Re: Adblock Plus add-on for FireFox

> I was hoping for an implementation of java > that would indeed enforce the sandbox principle > and prevent all websites from sending scripts that > try to jump out of the sandbox. The standard java and javascript in the web browser enforces the sandbox (barring bugs that then get fixed in errata

Re: Networking problem

On 05/16/11 23:42, Tom H wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:35 PM, JB wrote: >> JB gmail.com> writes: >> On Powerbook machine >> >> # /sbin/netstat -rn >> Routing tables >> Internet: >> DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire >> default192.168.1.254