Tim wrote:
> Michael Cronenworth:
>>> Nope. It has everything to do with booting. Some packages in /bin
>>> depended on libs in /usr/lib{64} so calling the init script
They should not. IMO, boot should depend only upon these directories
being present:
/
/boot
/bin
On 4/11/2011 6:35 PM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 02:59 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
>> I upgraded a working F13 x86_64 to F14 x 86_64 from a downloaded DVD
>> which verified and then went to do a "yum update" after the upgrade from
>> the DVD.
>>
>> I am getting the following message:
>
On 04/11/2011 02:59 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
> I upgraded a working F13 x86_64 to F14 x 86_64 from a downloaded DVD
> which verified and then went to do a "yum update" after the upgrade from
> the DVD.
>
> I am getting the following message:
>
> "http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/repoda
I'll download the Live CD and give it a go.
No funny drivers, all out the box fedora drivers. I'm not into playing
the the gui stuff so I don't make changes past setting resolution and
default display.
As an after thought the output in the Xorg.1.log :
[57.855]
X.Org X Server 1.9.5
Release D
On 11 April 2011 23:47, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
<--SNIP-->
>
> Try tracing the connection activity. See
> http://projects.gnome.org/evolution/bugs.shtml
>
> Specifically, run Evo from the command line thus:
>
> CAMEL_DEBUG=all evolution >& evo.log
>
> If you see anything odd (or if you don't un
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 23:09 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
> Hi, folks!
> I'm having difficulties accessing my mail using evolution. I'm on VPN
> and have to use specific proxy to access the web. However mail server
> requires no proxy. Using the same settings thunderbird works and
> evolution hangs up on che
Hi, folks!
I'm having difficulties accessing my mail using evolution. I'm on VPN
and have to use specific proxy to access the web. However mail server
requires no proxy. Using the same settings thunderbird works and
evolution hangs up on checking for new mail. When I press Send/Receive
button a new
On 04/11/2011 08:19 AM, Karol Babioch wrote:
> I would recommend ext4 as btrfs still isn't marked as stable. Although
> there are no bigger bugs to be expected anymore I would trust it in an
> production environment. Furthermore it will be possible to convert ext4
> into btrfs without bigger proble
I'm going to share my experience in case someone else is contemplating
going paperless like we were.
The Dell 3335dn (printer, scanner, copier, fax machine/server )arrived
last week.
http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&cs=04&l=en&sku=224-8405
Disclaimer. I have no affiliat
Hi,
Am 11.04.2011 17:31, schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
> The 'noatime' mount option has been a Fedora default for several
> releases now. There is no need to set it manually.
Good to know. I'm not a Fedora guru ;).
> There are no conclusive arguments to prefer ext4 or btrfs at this time.
> Eith
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 10:31 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> John Austin wrote:
> > UUID=0b0e2173-b356-476f-8091-a716189d1e1e / ext4
> > defaults,discard,noatime1 1
>
> John & Karol,
>
> The 'noatime' mount option has been a Fedora default for several
> releases now. There is
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> I know I can (and do) yum-update by adding --skip-broken .
>> But I'd be interested to know how I should deal with this error.
>> Is there documentation covering this kind of question?
>
> Try: yum reinstall xine-lib
> or: yum downgrade xine-l
John Austin wrote:
> UUID=0b0e2173-b356-476f-8091-a716189d1e1e / ext4
> defaults,discard,noatime1 1
John & Karol,
The 'noatime' mount option has been a Fedora default for several
releases now. There is no need to set it manually.
Neal,
There are no conclusive arguments to prefe
Hi,
Am 11.04.2011 16:26, schrieb Neal Becker:
> What filesystem should I use? Go for btrfs?
I would recommend ext4 as btrfs still isn't marked as stable. Although
there are no bigger bugs to be expected anymore I would trust it in an
production environment. Furthermore it will be possible to con
On 11/04/11 13:40, Richard A Hogaboom wrote:
> Fedora versions previous to 14 recognized the SCX-5530FN. Since there
> is no way to manually prod the system to load drivers, how to proceed?
> If there were an option in the "Automatic Bug Reporting Tool" to first
> enter the unrecognized printer mo
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 08:52 -0600, Phil Meyer wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 08:26 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> > I'm planning a fresh install of f15 onto
> > Intel 320 Series SSDSA2CW120G310
> >
> > What filesystem should I use? Go for btrfs?
> >
>
> You could also try the discard option for mounting ext4 f
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 10:26 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> I'm planning a fresh install of f15 onto
> Intel 320 Series SSDSA2CW120G310
>
> What filesystem should I use? Go for btrfs?
>
Hi
I have been using ext4(pre-formatting, no LVM) on my SSDs,
(partitioned using gdisk with some of them,
to ensu
-- Forwarded message --
From: Onyeibo Oku
Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:48 PM
Subject: [Ambassadors] Annoncing The Fedora Sound SIG
To: Fedora Ambassadors Mailing List
, Fedora Design Team Mailing List
Today we announce the Fedora Sound SIG. Our goal is to create free (as
in free
On 04/11/2011 08:26 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> I'm planning a fresh install of f15 onto
> Intel 320 Series SSDSA2CW120G310
>
> What filesystem should I use? Go for btrfs?
>
You could also try the discard option for mounting ext4 file systems.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
I'm planning a fresh install of f15 onto
Intel 320 Series SSDSA2CW120G310
What filesystem should I use? Go for btrfs?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedo
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 08:40 -0400, Richard A Hogaboom wrote:
> Fedora versions previous to 14 recognized the SCX-5530FN. Since there
> is no way to manually prod the system to load drivers, how to proceed?
> If there were an option in the "Automatic Bug Reporting Tool" to first
> enter the unrecog
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I know I can (and do) yum-update by adding --skip-broken .
> But I'd be interested to know how I should deal with this error.
> Is there documentation covering this kind of question?
man yum
Try: yum reinstall xine-lib
or: yum downgrade xine-lib
One of those commands shou
When I run "sudo yum update" I get a small number of errors like
--
Error: Package: xine-lib-1.1.19-22.fc14.i686 (@atrpms)
Requires: libfusion-1.4.so.0
Removing: directfb-1.4.11-2.fc14.i686 (@updates)
libfusion-1.4.so.0
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:54:53 -0400,
Stephen P Molnar wrote:
>
> What I have done is install (transfer(?)) Fedora 14 to a 8GB SanDisk USB
> Thumb Drive. At this point I can boot the laptop from the Thumb Drive and
> start the Fedora installer. I want to install Fedora on the Thumb Drive
>
I am considering returning to Red Hat, actually Fedora, after quite a few
years of using SuSE/OpenSUSE. However, before taking down my main platform,
which my wife uses for surfing, I'd like to test Fedora 14 on my laptop.
This raises another consideration in that I use the laptop for consulting
a
Fedora versions previous to 14 recognized the SCX-5530FN. Since there
is no way to manually prod the system to load drivers, how to proceed?
If there were an option in the "Automatic Bug Reporting Tool" to first
enter the unrecognized printer model and then have the bug tool collect
all the necess
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 00:43 -0700, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
> That is strange as I am not trying to update Adobe, just a general yum
> update
Unless you've disabled the Adobe repo, you are doing a "check everything
for an update," when you do "yum update."
> and I am getting a 404 Error "File not Fo
On 11/04/11 07:59, Gregory Machin wrote:
> results. So this is not limited to one machine. Both machines are
> upgrades from fc 13.
Could you try the F14 live CD, to see if the problem occurs with that ?
Could you make space and do an install to a new partition, to see if
that has a problem ?
A
On 09/04/11 16:15, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 10:20 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 09/04/11 04:05, Linuxguy123 wrote:
>
>
>
>>> How do I get my HDX to drive the U3011 at 2560x1600 ?
>>
>> You can't. It's not physically capable.
>>
>> With a dual-link DVI setup you'll see
>>
>>
On 4/11/2011 12:27 AM, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 01:59 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
>> I upgraded a working F13 x86_64 to F14 x 86_64 from a downloaded DVD
>> which verified and then went to do a "yum update" after the upgrade from
>> the DVD.
>>
>> I am getting the following message:
>>
>>
On 04/11/2011 01:59 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
> I upgraded a working F13 x86_64 to F14 x 86_64 from a downloaded DVD
> which verified and then went to do a "yum update" after the upgrade from
> the DVD.
>
> I am getting the following message:
>
> "http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/repodata/r
I upgraded a working F13 x86_64 to F14 x 86_64 from a downloaded DVD
which verified and then went to do a "yum update" after the upgrade from
the DVD.
I am getting the following message:
"http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno
14] PYCURL ERROR 6 - " "
Trying oth
32 matches
Mail list logo
