On 04/06/2011 10:14 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> gpg: Signature made Thu 03 Mar 2011 11:34:51 AM CST using RSA key ID
> 069C8460
> gpg: Good signature from "Fedora (15) "
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belon
Ah!
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/06/2011 10:22 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
>> Okay, Trying to verify the alpha netinst.iso, I seem to have forgotten
>> the way these files work, again.
>
> Step 1 is to verify the signature on the CHECKSUM file
>
> gpg --verify *-CHECKSU
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Joel Rees wrote:
>> gpg: Signature made Thu 03 Mar 2011 12:34:51 PM JST using RSA key ID 069C8460
>> gpg: Good signature from "Fedora (15) "
>> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
>> gpg: There is no in
On 04/06/2011 10:22 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
> Okay, Trying to verify the alpha netinst.iso, I seem to have forgotten
> the way these files work, again.
Step 1 is to verify the signature on the CHECKSUM file
gpg --verify *-CHECKSUM
That gives you confidence that the data in that file comes from
Okay, Trying to verify the alpha netinst.iso, I seem to have forgotten
the way these files work, again.
gpg --verify Fedora-15-Alpha-i386-CHECKSUM Fedora-15-Alpha-i386-netinst.iso
gpg: not a detached signature
---
This is telling me that the CHECKSUM combines the signature and the checksum.
On 04/06/2011 09:38 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
> I just pushed a fix for this to the fedora-web git repository¹. When
> the website syncs next it should be on the /keys page. That is the
> proper key and fingerprint (though I don't expect you to just take my
> word for that ;).
>
> The key file
Joel Rees wrote:
> gpg: Signature made Thu 03 Mar 2011 12:34:51 PM JST using RSA key ID 069C8460
> gpg: Good signature from "Fedora (15) "
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
> Primary ke
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 11:12 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 04/05/2011 10:43 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
>>> How does one verify boot.iso for the alpha version?
>>>
>>> I've imported the key file, but I don't see a proper signature or an
>>> sha256 checksum.
>> I
> The problem is that I have some other hardware that does not work all
>that well after suspend/hibernate and so I can have either that hardware
>(M-Audio 1010) working and the mouse at risk of failing or the 1010 not
>working.
So what you're saying is, while the M-Audio 1010 is working the ps/
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 19:29 -0300, Burkhard Plache wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 15:49 -0300, Burkhard Plache wrote:
> >> After inserting the DVD, I get the menu:
> >>
> >> 1) Install a new system or upgrade an existing system
> >>
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 15:49 -0300, Burkhard Plache wrote:
>> After inserting the DVD, I get the menu:
>>
>> 1) Install a new system or upgrade an existing system
>> 2) Install system with basic video driver
>> 3) Rescue installed system
Hi,
I'm trying to install Fedora on a MacBook but ran into a problem. Basically,
the computer's CD drive is not working properly so it will fail to load the
image from the disc half way through, with errors. I also can't boot from a USB
stick, since this is a MacBook.
So my question: is there a
Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 02:14 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
>> So maybe this is an issue
>> with X. I'm using the nVidia binary blob driver but the problem was
>> there with the nouveau driver.
>
> You need to understand that the nVidia driver has to be re-installed
> every time the kernel is upd
On 04/05/2011 02:14 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
> So maybe this is an issue
> with X. I'm using the nVidia binary blob driver but the problem was
> there with the nouveau driver.
You need to understand that the nVidia driver has to be re-installed
every time the kernel is updated. My advice is go here
Hi,
I've seem problems like this reported in various forums. I have a i7
Asus MB system with FC13 x64 and I'm using a PS2 keyboard and mouse.
They are old but they work well.
After the machine has been running for around 10-15 mins all input from
the keyboard and mouse fails. The system keeps
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 15:49 -0300, Burkhard Plache wrote:
> After inserting the DVD, I get the menu:
>
> 1) Install a new system or upgrade an existing system
> 2) Install system with basic video driver
> 3) Rescue installed system
> 4) Boot from local drive
> 5) Memory test
>
> I select option 1
2011/4/5 Burkhard Plache :
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to install F14 from DVD on an empty Laptop.
>
> After inserting the DVD, I get the menu:
>
> 1) Install a new system or upgrade an existing system
> 2) Install system with basic video driver
> 3) Rescue installed system
> 4) Boot from local drive
On 04/05/2011 11:49 AM, Burkhard Plache wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to install F14 from DVD on an empty Laptop.
>
> After inserting the DVD, I get the menu:
>
> 1) Install a new system or upgrade an existing system
> 2) Install system with basic video driver
> 3) Rescue installed system
> 4) B
Hello,
I am trying to install F14 from DVD on an empty Laptop.
After inserting the DVD, I get the menu:
1) Install a new system or upgrade an existing system
2) Install system with basic video driver
3) Rescue installed system
4) Boot from local drive
5) Memory test
I select option 1, and afte
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:06:03 -0400
Lamar Owen wrote:
> Lots of DVD drives use the Z80 and the successor chips
That must explain why it takes 'em 10 minutes to figure
out what kind of disk you just put in the drive :-).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change s
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 18:39 +0200, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> It is a 6 x Quad-Core server with virtualization support enabled (runs
> on RHEL 5)
[Please don't top-post; see the Guidelines]
Have you enabled multiple cores in your VBox configuration, as per the
manual?
On the "Processor" tab,
On Sunday, April 03, 2011 05:17:54 AM Alan Cox wrote:
> Still lots of Z80 based ones around in the UK too where the protocol work
> is done on a magic box on a serial port - never seen anything running
> CP/M however, the stuff I've seen all runs raw on the hardware.
Lots of DVD drives use the Z80
On 04/03/2011 10:16 PM, JD wrote:
> On 04/03/2011 06:41 PM, Jim wrote:
>> Fedora 14
>>
>> I have a backup drive at sdb1 a Vfat (fat32) partition a USB hard drive
>> that before upgrading from Fedora 13 to Fedora 14 , the owner was
>> Michael , but after upgrade it is now owned by root. all the bac
On 04/05/2011 12:39 PM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> It is a 6 x Quad-Core server with virtualization support enabled (runs
> on RHEL 5)
Are you sure the problem is that you are CPU bound? Could this be a
memory or disk i/o issue?
--
Digimer
E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.com
AN!Whitepapers: http://alteeve.c
Hi,
Am 05.04.2011 17:57, schrieb Varuna Seneviratna:
> Am I safe when surfing the web with
> default Firewall setting?
Well, you'll never be safe, that is for sure ;). Security is always a
trade-off.
What kind of environment are you using your computer in? The firewall is
probably only necessary
It is a 6 x Quad-Core server with virtualization support enabled (runs
on RHEL 5)
Le 05/04/11 18:33, Patrick O'Callaghan a écrit :
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 12:29 -0400, Digimer wrote:
>> On 04/05/2011 12:09 PM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> until now, I use VirtualBox to manage several virtu
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 12:29 -0400, Digimer wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 12:09 PM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > until now, I use VirtualBox to manage several virtual machines. I have
> > performances problems. I can see that the VMS don't use really all CPU
> > capabilities. I think that the prob
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 21:27 +0530, Varuna Seneviratna wrote:
> I am new to Linux and Fedora. Am I safe when surfing the web with
> default Firewall setting? Can My Computer be hacked when the firewall
> is in the default setting?
> I have no knowledge on configuring Firewalls
Most attacks on web b
On 04/05/2011 12:09 PM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> until now, I use VirtualBox to manage several virtual machines. I have
> performances problems. I can see that the VMS don't use really all CPU
> capabilities. I think that the problem come from the CPU emulation done
> by VirtualBox.
>
> So
On 04/05/2011 11:57 AM, Varuna Seneviratna wrote:
> I am new to Linux and Fedora. Am I safe when surfing the web with
> default Firewall setting? Can My Computer be hacked when the firewall
> is in the default setting?
> I have no knowledge on configuring Firewalls
>
> Help Appreciated
> Varuna
D
On 05/04/11 16:38, Jim wrote:
> on the KDE-4 desktop, after opening a window, and if you move window to
> top of desktop
> it will expaned to full screen.
>
> Is there a setting in Kde that will stop a window from epanding to full
> screen automatically ?
You certainly can, bring up system sett
Hi,
until now, I use VirtualBox to manage several virtual machines. I have
performances problems. I can see that the VMS don't use really all CPU
capabilities. I think that the problem come from the CPU emulation done
by VirtualBox.
So I said to me that the solution is to use a real hypervisor
I am new to Linux and Fedora. Am I safe when surfing the web with
default Firewall setting? Can My Computer be hacked when the firewall
is in the default setting?
I have no knowledge on configuring Firewalls
Help Appreciated
Varuna
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
on the KDE-4 desktop, after opening a window, and if you move window to
top of desktop
it will expaned to full screen.
Is there a setting in Kde that will stop a window from epanding to full
screen automatically ?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subs
On 04/04/11 16:10, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 4 April 2011 19:12, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>>I have never found a scheme for recording a video stream from
>>VLC, don't see "View|Advanced Controls" and a record setting. I
>>may be missing something.
>>
> That's odd. Maybe a differen
On 04/05/2011 11:12 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 10:43 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
>> How does one verify boot.iso for the alpha version?
>>
>> I've imported the key file, but I don't see a proper signature or an
>> sha256 checksum.
> I downloaded from a mirror and it was there
>
> e.g.
> f
On 04/05/2011 10:43 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> How does one verify boot.iso for the alpha version?
>
> I've imported the key file, but I don't see a proper signature or an
> sha256 checksum.
I downloaded from a mirror and it was there
e.g.
ftp://ftp.isu.edu.tw:0/pub/Linux/Fedora/linux/releases/
How does one verify boot.iso for the alpha version?
I've imported the key file, but I don't see a proper signature or an
sha256 checksum.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guide
Ken Smith wrote:
> {snip}
> This might be related. On my FC13 system, on 22 Mar, qemu went from
>
> qemu-common-0.12.5-1.fc13.x86_64 to -> qemu-common-0.13.0-1.fc13.x86_64
>
> After that update an XP vm no longer boots. Win 7 and Centos VM's are
> fine. The XP vm was installed with the work-around
Ed Greshko:
>> Don't worry No matter what you say about how well it works for
>> "you" there will be someone that will argue that what "you" are doing
>> isn't optimal and you should do it "their way'. :-)
Linuxguy123:
> True enough. And yet one of those "you should do it my way" posts
> re
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:29:03 -0400, Genes wrote:
> (2) encryption
> Both support gpg -
> TB additionally supports s/mime certs (cannot find it in claws -
> anywone know for sure - tho I imagine it is there?)
>
> If you're communicating with any .mil (or someone who uses this
41 matches
Mail list logo
