On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 14:48 -0700, suvayu ali wrote:
> On 30 July 2010 14:31, Alex wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> I talked to the plymouth maintainer and he said this is a known bug; I
> >> don't know if the fix is in F13 yet but let me explain what's going on:
> >>
> >> You've got two bugs. One is a ker
JB wrote:
> JB yahoo.com> writes:
>
>
Hi,
is that what you are asking about ?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F13_bugs
5 Hardware-related issues.
Miscellaneous graphical problems.
To use the vesa driver during installation, ...
>>> Follow
Mike Wright wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> Time to upgrade, I'm afraid. You'll get no support for Fedora 10. It was
>> end-of-lifed about six months ago. There are no more updates coming for
>> it, ever.
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/IRC/Fedora-EOL-Support
>>
>
> T
Chris Tyler wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 08:11 -0400, Philip Russell wrote:
>
>> Got rid of windows, Love Fedora 13, Just not familiar with it as much
>> yet
>>
>> Im getting a message "There are unfinished transactions remaining.
>> Please run yum-complete-transaction as root."
>>
Anothe
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> Well, I used a separate /boot partition because in the past somehow,
> grub or partition MBR got lost when something changed via an update.
> Maybe this a non-issue by now?
>
I never met with it. But I never use LVM or device-mapper logical
devices, only plain or md one
On 07/30/2010 06:51 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>
>> Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> Can grub boot from a logical partition?
>>>
>>> It seems from my reading that it cannot.
>>>
>>> But I found that I could in fact boot from /dev/sda5
>>> if I used grub interactivel
On 07/30/2010 06:37 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>> Can grub boot from a logical partition?
>>
>> It seems from my reading that it cannot.
>>
>> But I found that I could in fact boot from /dev/sda5
>> if I used grub interactively, starting with
>>root (hd0,4)
>> the
Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Can grub boot from a logical partition?
>>
>> It seems from my reading that it cannot.
>>
>> But I found that I could in fact boot from /dev/sda5
>> if I used grub interactively, starting with
>> root (hd0,4)
>> then using tab to look for kern
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Can grub boot from a logical partition?
>
> It seems from my reading that it cannot.
>
> But I found that I could in fact boot from /dev/sda5
> if I used grub interactively, starting with
>root (hd0,4)
> then using tab to look for kernel and initrd
> and finally booting.
On 07/30/2010 03:21 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Can grub boot from a logical partition?
>
> It seems from my reading that it cannot.
>
> But I found that I could in fact boot from /dev/sda5
> if I used grub interactively, starting with
> root (hd0,4)
> then using tab to look for kernel and initrd
I am running fedora 12 and the sound recorder fails when I try to record from a
mike.
It says No modules available.
Any ideas out there?
thanks
Chip
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
Can grub boot from a logical partition?
It seems from my reading that it cannot.
But I found that I could in fact boot from /dev/sda5
if I used grub interactively, starting with
root (hd0,4)
then using tab to look for kernel and initrd
and finally booting.
However, if I put exactly the same co
On 07/30/2010 12:44 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 12:59 -0700, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>>
>>> Any ideas much appreciated?
>>>
>> Looks like you have the authorization for the sound device sorted out
On 30 July 2010 14:31, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I talked to the plymouth maintainer and he said this is a known bug; I
>> don't know if the fix is in F13 yet but let me explain what's going on:
>>
>> You've got two bugs. One is a kernel panic. The other is that when the
>> kernel is panicking, rathe
Hi,
> I talked to the plymouth maintainer and he said this is a known bug; I
> don't know if the fix is in F13 yet but let me explain what's going on:
>
> You've got two bugs. One is a kernel panic. The other is that when the
> kernel is panicking, rather than showing useful debug information, it
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Craig White wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 16:18 -0400, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>> Fedora 11, 12
>>
>> Changing Forgotten Root Password.
>>
>> Starting computer and going into Single User Mode and deleting the "x"
>> in /etc/passwd and restarting computer and
1) Start (reboot) machine
2) Enter grub ( pressing the letter 'e' )
3) Go to the second line and edit the line ( pressing the letter 'e' )
4) Go to the the end of the line and insert the word ( single )
5) Press Enter
6) Press the letter 'b'
7) wait
8) #passwd root
9) Enter password for root
10) #
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:18:27 -0400
binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> Fedora 11, 12
>
> Changing Forgotten Root Password.
>
> Starting computer and going into Single User Mode and deleting the
> "x" in /etc/passwd and restarting computer and login as "root" and
> add new root password, does that s
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 16:18 -0400, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> Fedora 11, 12
>
> Changing Forgotten Root Password.
>
> Starting computer and going into Single User Mode and deleting the "x"
> in /etc/passwd and restarting computer and login as "root" and add new
> root password, does that s
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 16:18 -0400, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> Fedora 11, 12
>
> Changing Forgotten Root Password.
>
> Starting computer and going into Single User Mode and deleting the "x"
> in /etc/passwd and restarting computer and login as "root" and add new
> root password, does that st
Fedora 11, 12
Changing Forgotten Root Password.
Starting computer and going into Single User Mode and deleting the "x"
in /etc/passwd and restarting computer and login as "root" and add new
root password, does that still hold true for FC10, 11, 12
/etc/passwd
root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:09:13 -0500, Rick Sewill wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/30/2010 10:43 AM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a recurring problem with sound streaming with Fedora 13 (and
>> earlier versions - I am having this problem
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 12:59 -0700, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>> Any ideas much appreciated?
>
> Looks like you have the authorization for the sound device sorted out;
> there may also be something you have to do to tell pulseaudio to play
> sou
Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 08:32 AM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>
>> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>>
>>> First, I know F9 is no longer supported, but wanted to
>>> ask if there is a workaround to this problem.
>>>
>>> I finally got rt2870 to work on F9, however, I noticed
>>> during a re
On 07/30/2010 08:32 AM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>> First, I know F9 is no longer supported, but wanted to
>> ask if there is a workaround to this problem.
>>
>> I finally got rt2870 to work on F9, however, I noticed
>> during a reboot, httpd complained that it could not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 10:43 AM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a recurring problem with sound streaming with Fedora 13 (and
> earlier versions - I am having this problem for quite a while, across
> different Fedora versions) on my Dell L
Around 04:57pm on Friday, July 30, 2010 (UK time), David scrawled:
> Could be. You are aware of course that all the 'modern' distro's are
> similar to Fedora in development? Kernels, Xorg, and such. Stable would
> be like Debian, CentOS, and the like. And IMO stable=stale. :-)
Yes, I was thinkin
On 7/30/2010 11:13 AM, Steve Searle wrote:
> Around 03:33pm on Friday, July 30, 2010 (UK time), David scrawled:
>
>> So that's one example which you 'documented' well. My complaint(s) are
>> with the vague claims that some make but then never show any proof.
>> Which I am seeing more and more of t
Hello,
I have a recurring problem with sound streaming with Fedora 13 (and
earlier versions - I am having this problem for quite a while, across
different Fedora versions) on my Dell Latitude 820 laptop. This
affects equally the sound of YouTube videos and music CDs. Sometimes
it works flaw
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> First, I know F9 is no longer supported, but wanted to
> ask if there is a workaround to this problem.
>
> I finally got rt2870 to work on F9, however, I noticed
> during a reboot, httpd complained that it could not find
> the host's domain, so it chose 127.0.0.1, and sec
Around 03:33pm on Friday, July 30, 2010 (UK time), David scrawled:
> So that's one example which you 'documented' well. My complaint(s) are
> with the vague claims that some make but then never show any proof.
> Which I am seeing more and more of these days.
Ouch, presumably that is aimed at me f
On 7/30/2010 10:24 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 09:39 -0400, David wrote:
>> I would think that qualifies as a driver problem. :-)
>
> I agree.
>
>> But not a Windows driver problem. Why not? It is a HP problem. Their
>> hardware and their driver(s). Windows had nothing
First, I know F9 is no longer supported, but wanted to
ask if there is a workaround to this problem.
I finally got rt2870 to work on F9, however, I noticed
during a reboot, httpd complained that it could not find
the host's domain, so it chose 127.0.0.1, and secondly
named responded only to local
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
>
> Thanks for that but I'm well aware that it's been EOL'd. I was rather
> more curious as to why I've never seen this brought up (been rh'ing
> since redhat5.2 fit on a single cd in a red jacket a dozen years ago).
Since you had the problem i
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 09:39 -0400, David wrote:
> I would think that qualifies as a driver problem. :-)
I agree.
> But not a Windows driver problem. Why not? It is a HP problem. Their
> hardware and their driver(s). Windows had nothing to do with any of
> this. Microsoft gave plenty of time for
On 7/30/2010 9:14 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 06:28 -0400, David wrote:
>> Again - Windows "Driver hell"? I don't know of any. Examples please.
>
> I don't know if this counts as "driver hell", but it was certainly
> "hell" when it happened. A year or two back I purchase
JB yahoo.com> writes:
>
> > > Hi,
> > > is that what you are asking about ?
> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F13_bugs
> > > 5 Hardware-related issues.
> > > Miscellaneous graphical problems.
> > > To use the vesa driver during installation, ...
> > >
> > Followed the instructions, b
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 06:28 -0400, David wrote:
> Again - Windows "Driver hell"? I don't know of any. Examples please.
I don't know if this counts as "driver hell", but it was certainly
"hell" when it happened. A year or two back I purchased an HP Photosmart
all-in-one scanner/printer. It has its
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 06:28 -0400, David wrote:
> Windows "Driver hell"?
>
> The basic hardware drivers usually come with Windows. Fedora provides
> basic, some quite advanced actually, hardware drivers for many pieces of
> hardware.
>
> The 'better' Windows hardware drivers come with the hardwa
On 07/29/2010 10:05 AM, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 06/28/2010 02:33 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
>> I am trying to set up dnsmasq as a local resolver cache on my F-12
>> laptop, and can't find any way to pass the nameservers returned by DHCP
>> to dnsmasq as upstream nameservers and still have 127.0.0
On 7/30/2010 5:46 AM, Steve Searle wrote:
> Around 02:44am on Friday, July 30, 2010 (UK time), David scrawled:
>
>> On 7/29/2010 5:00 PM, Steve Searle wrote:
>>> Around 09:54pm on Thursday, July 29, 2010 (UK time), James Mckenzie
>>> scrawled:
>>>
And the comment on "Linux on the Desktop".
On 30/07/10 10:46, Steve Searle wrote:
> Who supplies them is not the point here. "Driver hell" happens on
> Windows as well, yet that is considered a desktop system.
>
They have the resources to say it is :D
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
users mailing list
users@
Around 02:44am on Friday, July 30, 2010 (UK time), David scrawled:
> On 7/29/2010 5:00 PM, Steve Searle wrote:
> > Around 09:54pm on Thursday, July 29, 2010 (UK time), James Mckenzie
> > scrawled:
> >
> >> And the comment on "Linux on the Desktop". Not ready yet. We need it so
> >> that users
> Hi,
>
> I'm planning to purchase an USB TV stick (for DVB-T). I saw that the
> AVermedia AVerTV Black HD/-A850 USB is running properly under Ubuntu.
> Can somebody confirm that is runs properly under F13 too?
>
> Kind regards and thanx in advance
>
> Joachim Backes
>
> http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 15:16 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 07/29/2010 01:17 AM, Chris Rouch wrote:
> > I think this was working for f13 too until the last time i applied
> > updates, though it may just be that i didn't test it.
>
> The first thing you should try is probably to boot the oldest F
hi,
I recently came across what looks like an awesome tool : vim-latex.
I've installed the fedora packages using yum.
[an...@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep vim
vim-latex-doc-1.8.23-1.20100129.r1104.fc13.noarch
vim-latex-1.8.23-1.20100129.r1104.fc13.noarch
vim-minimal-7.2.411-1.fc13.x86_64
vim-commo
Hi,
I'm planning to purchase an USB TV stick (for DVB-T). I saw that the
AVermedia AVerTV Black HD/-A850 USB is running properly under Ubuntu.
Can somebody confirm that is runs properly under F13 too?
Kind regards and thanx in advance
Joachim Backes
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p
47 matches
Mail list logo
