On 06/16/2010 11:38 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 21:22 +0530, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
>
>> that's correct, but if it possible to get /download that video from
>> the terminal? like by typing the URL containing the video or fetch
>> video id. or something like that and than downloading
First of all, I installed the squid (SQUID 3.0.STABLE25) via yum as:
su
yum install squid*
yum list squid
cd /etc/squid
ls
The output of the last command ('ls') is:
cachemgr.conf mime.conf squid.conf.default
cachemgr.conf.default mime.conf.default squidGuard.conf
err
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 21:22 +0530, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> that's correct, but if it possible to get /download that video from
> the terminal? like by typing the URL containing the video or fetch
> video id. or something like that and than downloading, though GUI
> downloader plugin does that.
If
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 16:43 -0400, Edmon Begoli wrote:
> I have a Dell Latitude 830 laptop with Fedora 12. I never move it,
> so I want to be able to close to lid and just use monitor, but my OS
> shuts down automatically.
Just a warning: Does your laptop need the lid open for ventilation?
Some d
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 14:47 -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> An inferior format, VHS, image qualitywise, yes
No. Have you actually compared them, or just repeating gossip? I have.
They were both as bad as each other, in general. And when there was a
difference, the Beta machines I've seen were wo
On 06/16/2010 08:34 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 18:24:05 -0700,
> Joe Conway wrote:
>>
>> But if I do nothing, my choices are:
>> 1) hope to get lucky on some future kernel update
>> 2) buy new hardware
>> 3) live with not using scp or rsync over ssh
>>
>> Maybe it's tim
On 06/17/2010 07:27 AM, Brian Mury wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 10:31 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
>> I'm not having any issues with Firefox and don't use Evolution. My big
>> issue is with Rhythmbox, but it's a continuing issue from F12.
>> Sometimes, it just stops playing and requires a "killall"
Ok... I've *finally* managed to figure out what's going on here...
In the end, turned out to be a bug in GStreamer, and that *downgrading* to the
previous version of the RPM fixed everything up for me.
The bug in question turns out to be:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603496
w
On 06/16/2010 10:27 PM, Brian Mury wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 10:31 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
>
>> I'm not having any issues with Firefox and don't use Evolution. My big
>> issue is with Rhythmbox, but it's a continuing issue from F12.
>> Sometimes, it just stops playing and requires a "
On 06/16/2010 05:25 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
...
> I guess I had better devote a few cups of coffee
> to learning more about DNS ...
Trust me: It takes more than a few cups of coffee :-)
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk
http://www.lemo.dk
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.or
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 10:31 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
> I'm not having any issues with Firefox and don't use Evolution. My big
> issue is with Rhythmbox, but it's a continuing issue from F12.
> Sometimes, it just stops playing and requires a "killall" or force-quit
> to shut it down.
Does this ha
On 06/17/2010 07:07 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> So, neither you nor Ed Grashko have the problem with Fedora 13. Rex
> Dieter doesn't say which version he's using. (I use F12).
>
> I suppose, after a search, I'll use CTRL + V to paste until I upgrade
> to Fedora 13. Since Ed says he doesn't have the p
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, jarmo wrote:
>Gene Heskett kirjoitti torstai, 17. kesäkuuta 2010 05:17:29:
>> Yeah, it works here, but its eating 40-60% of all 4 cores of a
>
>2.1Ghz
>
>> phenom. Folks with lessor machines need not apply.
>
>Are you sure, that it is flash. In my case it was nspluginwra
On 06/16/2010 08:00 PM, jarmo wrote:
> Gene Heskett kirjoitti torstai, 17. kesäkuuta 2010 05:17:29:
>
>
>> Yeah, it works here, but its eating 40-60% of all 4 cores of a
>>
> 2.1Ghz
>
>> phenom. Folks with lessor machines need not apply.
>>
> Are you sure, that it is flash. I
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 18:24:05 -0700,
Joe Conway wrote:
>
> But if I do nothing, my choices are:
> 1) hope to get lucky on some future kernel update
> 2) buy new hardware
> 3) live with not using scp or rsync over ssh
>
> Maybe it's time for a hardware upgrade
Maybe borrow a network car
On 06/16/2010 07:17 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, JD wrote:
>
>> On 06/16/2010 03:29 PM, Peter A wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> so this one has me completely stomped... After upgrading to F13 (though
>>> yum but I also tested with a clean F13 install, same behavior) e
Hi Todd,
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 13:12, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> Andre Costa wrote:
> > Yeah, I hoped it would just work when I read F13 release notes, too
> > :-(
>
> I just noticed that we don't have the latest libgpod included in F-13.
> I'm correcting that now, which might help.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 19:52:49 -0400,
Marcel Rieux wrote:
>
> Isn't RPMfusion preparing its upcoming module according to the kernel
> version that is in Testing? I would think that RPMfusion has a nice working
> module for kernel 2.6.32.10-92.fc12. Since Fedora decided instead to update
> wit
Gene Heskett kirjoitti torstai, 17. kesäkuuta 2010 05:17:29:
> Yeah, it works here, but its eating 40-60% of all 4 cores of a
2.1Ghz
> phenom. Folks with lessor machines need not apply.
Are you sure, that it is flash. In my case it was nspluginwrapper.
I removed that and now, where ever flash i
My previous post is subjected: F13 crackle/noise sound problem!, but it is F12
crackle/noise sound problem!. Sorry my bad ;p
Ardhan,
_
Listen to KNAC, Hit the Home page and Tune In Live! ---> http://www.knac.com
--
user
I'm using F12, actually this is an old problem for me when first installing
F12. I got 'click/crackled' sound everytime i switch another media file (while
playing) or stopping the application such as Rhythmbox and Totem while playing.
I followed Bugs documentation at http://fedoraproject.org
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, JD wrote:
>On 06/16/2010 03:29 PM, Peter A wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> so this one has me completely stomped... After upgrading to F13 (though
>> yum but I also tested with a clean F13 install, same behavior) every
>> flash video (e.g. youtube) plays significantly faster than it
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote:
>On 6/16/2010 7:22 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote:
>>> On 6/16/2010 4:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>>
>>> Gene uses 64-bit Firefox, I think, and he was using the 64bit Flash. I
>>> gave him the link. Naivel
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>I downloaded about 600 megs of Fedora-13-i386-DVD.iso starting from
>http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-all and a thunderstorm came
>along and blocked my path to the satellite. A message popped up
>indicating the download was finis
On 06/16/2010 03:29 PM, Peter A wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so this one has me completely stomped... After upgrading to F13 (though yum
> but I also tested with a clean F13 install, same behavior) every flash video
> (e.g. youtube) plays significantly faster than it should... A 45 second video
> plays in a
On 6/16/2010 7:22 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote:
>> On 6/16/2010 4:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>
>> Gene uses 64-bit Firefox, I think, and he was using the 64bit Flash. I
>> gave him the link. Naively. The 32-bit Flash will work with Firefox and
>> a
On 6/16/2010 7:18 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote:
>> On 6/16/2010 2:28 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> ==
> As I said, this is the one installed and linked. This listing is from
> ~/Downloads, not whats installed.
>
>>
>> Ever
Joe Conway writes:
On 06/16/2010 05:39 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
2) Using kexec-tools to set up a recovery kernel. Adding the crashkernel
parameter to your kernel boot prompt, reserving 128MB of your RAM for a
recovery kernel and a small boot image. When your running kernel
crashes, the recove
On 06/16/2010 05:39 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Based on the assumption that you are experiencing a kernel crash, there
> are two ways of obtaining diagnostics:
>
> 1) A serial console. Going retro, getting a null-modem adapter, and
> connecting the serial port of the ailing machine with the seri
On 16/06/10 21:17, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Bob Goodwin writes:
>
>>
>> I downloaded about 600 megs of Fedora-13-i386-DVD.iso starting from
>> http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-all and a thunderstorm came
>> along and blocked my path to the satellite. A message popped up
>> in
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote:
> On 16 June 2010 04:27, L wrote:
>> this is the output of xrandr at console.
>>
>> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 800, maximum 8192 x 8192
>> LVDS1 connected 1280x800+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y
>> axis) 331mm x 207mm
>
Bob Goodwin writes:
I downloaded about 600 megs of Fedora-13-i386-DVD.iso starting from
http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-all and a thunderstorm came
along and blocked my path to the satellite. A message popped up
indicating the download was finished. Of course it should b
I downloaded about 600 megs of Fedora-13-i386-DVD.iso starting from
http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-all and a thunderstorm came
along and blocked my path to the satellite. A message popped up
indicating the download was finished. Of course it should be 3.1 gigs!
Is the
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 19:27 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Kevin Martin
> wrote:
>
>
>
> This has nothing to do with "who broke what". This has
> everything to do
> with attempting to make Fedora, and other Linux va
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 19:52 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Bruno Wolff III
> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 19:03:41 -0400,
> Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >
>
> > How can rpmfusion provide the module for a kernel it's not
Konstantin Svist wrote:
> Thanks for suggestion, I've upgraded.. will see if it's any better
welcome.
rawhide is a good way to do upgrade. i hope i works for you and jerry.
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy
Jerry Feldman wrote:
> BTW: I am subscribed to the Thunderbird list, but I have not had the
> time to follow it recently. As I mentioned before, I have been ignoring
> my friend Google :-)
not having time is very understandable.
may well be that upgrading, as konstantin suggest, may well be a b
Paul Otheim wrote:
> hadn't seen anything on the list about this, I don't know if Fedora even
> has a package available for this but for all you gamers out there beware.
>
> https://infosecurity.us/?p=15207 (Google Chrome throws a fit about this page
> being a security problem)
>
> or
>
> http
Joe Conway writes:
Upon upgrade to Fedora 13 and the 2.6.33 kernel, the problem has become
better in that I have not seen a hang during the nightly crons. However,
now I can freeze the kernel on demand by copying a large file via ssh
(scp or rsync). Perhaps relevant is that those cron nightly jo
Robert Myers wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Sam Sharpe wrot
>
>> There is better coverage here:
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/14/linux_game_backdoor/
>>
>>
> Better coverage of a sort, I suppose.
>
> "A warning today that Linux users are not as immune to security threats as
>
I have had a problem with kernel freezes for several months. It started
when I first moved to the 2.6.31 kernel on Fedora 12. At that time it
was relatively infrequent. When the 2.6.32 kernel came out, the problem
became very bad -- every night when cron.daily runs the kernel would
hang. Note that
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 23:41 +0100, M A Young wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Gerhard Magnus wrote:
>
> > I am trying to upgrade the boxes on a small LAN from FC11 to FC13. The
> > server is now running FC13 and NFS. One of the boxes that is still
> > running FC11 can read & write to the shared direc
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:49:29 -0400
Ted Roche wrote:
> Obviously, I missed something in getting this set up. Should I have
> installed the new Grub to the boot partition? Suggestions on
> troubleshooting appreciated.
You should probably do this instead:
title Fedora x86_64
rootnoverify (hd0,7)
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 19:03:41 -0400,
> Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >
> > How can rpmfusion provide the module for a kernel it's not expecting
> because
> > the one in testing -- posted yesterday -- is an earlier kernel? This
> > seems
Greetings:
I've got a ThinkPad T61 (Core2Duo-2.5GHz, 4Gb RAM, 250Gb disk) with a
working F11 32-bit install on their own separate boot (1012Mb) and
root (/) partitions. I also dual-boot WinXP when necessary for
work-related tasks. I've got two spare partitions (25Gb and 50Gb) onto
which I wanted t
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
>
> This has nothing to do with "who broke what". This has everything to do
> with attempting to make Fedora, and other Linux variants, mainstream
> enough for the common person to use.
>
Have you seen Taxi Driver? There's a reply where De Ni
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote:
>On 6/16/2010 4:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:20 -0400, David Boles wrote:
>>> Since there is no longer a 64bit Flash plugin available you will have
>>> to use a 32bit browser.
>>
>> Not so. I use 64-bit Chromium and 32-b
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote:
>On 6/16/2010 2:28 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote:
>>> On 6/16/2010 12:17 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve Underwood wrote:
> On 06/16/2010 09:55 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Steven P. Ulrick <
lists-fed...@afolkey2.net> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Ed Greshko
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 06/16/2010 04:54 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So. if somebody could fill the bug report, I would appreciate. It's
> > > > not an
On 06/16/2010 06:10 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> --- On Tue, 6/15/10, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> Linux is already targeted plenty at the server level. Leave
>> a
>> linux box hooked to the internet with the firewall turned
>> off
>> for a few hours and see what happens :-).
>
> Desktop level, too. My
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Sam Sharpe wrot
>
> There is better coverage here:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/14/linux_game_backdoor/
>
>
Better coverage of a sort, I suppose.
"A warning today that Linux users are not as immune to security threats as
many of them like to believe"
An
Hi,
so this one has me completely stomped... After upgrading to F13 (though yum
but I also tested with a clean F13 install, same behavior) every flash video
(e.g. youtube) plays significantly faster than it should... A 45 second video
plays in about 12 seconds without any sound at all.
The we
--- On Tue, 6/15/10, Dale J. Chatham wrote:
> On 06/15/2010 12:28 AM, Patrick
> Bartek wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > There was a similar problem 35 years ago with consumer
> video recording and/or playback formats. Ultimately,
> the consumer chose which format it preferred. They
> will, again. It j
On 6/16/2010 5:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 17:22 -0400, David Boles wrote:
>> On 6/16/2010 4:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:20 -0400, David Boles wrote:
Since there is no longer a 64bit Flash plugin available you will have
to u
--- On Tue, 6/15/10, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:42:16 -0600
> Greg Woods wrote:
>
> > I believe it is only a matter of (not much) time
> before Linux is
> > targeted.
>
> Linux is already targeted plenty at the server level. Leave
> a
> linux box hooked to the internet with the
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 17:22 -0400, David Boles wrote:
> On 6/16/2010 4:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:20 -0400, David Boles wrote:
> >> Since there is no longer a 64bit Flash plugin available you will have
> >> to use a 32bit browser.
> >
> > Not so. I use 64-bit Ch
--- On Mon, 6/14/10, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/15/2010 01:28 PM, Patrick
> Bartek wrote:
> >
> > There was a similar problem 35 years ago with consumer
> video recording and/or playback formats. Ultimately,
> the consumer chose which format it preferred. They
> will, again. It just takes time.
The info below shows my problem.
$ sudo yum -y update
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
adobe-linux-i386
| 951 B 00:00
google-chrome
--- On Wed, 6/16/10, Mats wrote:
> I have tried to find information about fedoras evolution
> but haven't
> find an answer to the following question:
> How long will fedora 12 be supported with security
> updates?
Approximately 13 months from initial release. This goes for all Fedora
releases.
On 6/16/2010 4:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:20 -0400, David Boles wrote:
>> Since there is no longer a 64bit Flash plugin available you will have
>> to use a 32bit browser.
>
> Not so. I use 64-bit Chromium and 32-bit Flash works with it. In fact
> I'm guessing that
On 06/17/2010 02:03 AM, JD wrote:
>
> Seems to me this is a moot point.
> Each distro, and in fact each repo, builds it's packages which end up in
> some or many cases with different required dependencies from same
> package built on some other repo or distro - depending on what was
> installed
On 06/16/2010 01:43 PM, Edmon Begoli wrote:
Hi,
I have a Dell Latitude 830 laptop with Fedora 12. I never move it,
so I want to be able to close to lid and just use monitor, but my OS
shuts down automatically.
Is there a way to enable this and if so, please tell me how
I am using Xfce but I
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 13:37 -0700, JD wrote:
> I hope someone comes up with a different way other than flash for
> playing video content within the browser
There are lots, but the sites people want to visit generally use Flash,
and Flash is not just a video player. That's the whole problem.
poc
Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law.
On 6/14/10, Curt Stauffer wrote:
> I haven't seen any responses to this one, I hope that it made it out
> to the list ;-{
>
> If anyone can help I'd really appreciate it.
>
> -Curt
in lieu of _real_ help,
1) maybe anaconda was just taking a lon
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:20 -0400, David Boles wrote:
> Since there is no longer a 64bit Flash plugin available you will have
> to use a 32bit browser.
Not so. I use 64-bit Chromium and 32-bit Flash works with it. In fact
I'm guessing that any browser that sandboxes plugins in separate
processes s
Hi,
I have a Dell Latitude 830 laptop with Fedora 12. I never move it,
so I want to be able to close to lid and just use monitor, but my OS
shuts down automatically.
Is there a way to enable this and if so, please tell me how
I am using Xfce but I could switch to Gnome.
Thank you,
Edmon
--
use
On 06/16/2010 01:29 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> "Robert G. (Doc) Savage" writes:
>
>> I can't imagine what has prompted Adobe to pack up their proverbial bat
>> & ball and go home, abandoning 64-bit Flash development for all
>> platforms. I hope there's another explanation, because t
On 06/16/2010 01:13 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
>
> On 06/15/2010 10:24 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:22:21 -0500 Kevin Martin
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 06/15/2010 04:05 PM, David Boles wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 6/15/2010 4:35 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
>>
"Robert G. (Doc) Savage" writes:
> I can't imagine what has prompted Adobe to pack up their proverbial bat
> & ball and go home, abandoning 64-bit Flash development for all
> platforms. I hope there's another explanation, because this is just
> beyond dumb.
I was reading an article about llvm, t
On 06/16/2010 02:50 PM, g wrote:
> Jerry Feldman wrote:
>
>
>
>> Now, other things seem to be misbehaving with Thunderbird.
>> First, I've had top running and when it seems to freeze, I'm seeing
>> Thunderbird taking about 100% of the CPU. So it seems that T-Bird gets
>>
>
>
> you are sta
On 06/15/2010 10:24 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:22:21 -0500 Kevin Martin
> wrote:
>
>
>> On 06/15/2010 04:05 PM, David Boles wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/15/2010 4:35 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 06/15/2010 02:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
On 06/16/2010 11:50 AM, g wrote:
> solutions to your problems have been disabling "features" to upgrading.
> because of various problems with 3.0.x versions, an upgrade to 3.1 or
> higher is better.
>
> i know this can be a problem under linux, but there are ways.
>
Thanks for suggestion, I'
mark benschop wrote:
> Hi Rich,
> Thanks for your reply.
> Please find the logging from the problems below.
> The serverb55 is one of 2 servers in a multiple masters configuration
> that consists of serverb55 and serverb05.
>
> The problem I inititially had was that I had 2 entries that could not
On 6/16/2010 2:28 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote:
>> On 6/16/2010 12:17 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve Underwood wrote:
On 06/16/2010 09:55 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
This is what they released last week, an
The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability of Release
Candidate 1 of version 1.2.6. This release a couple of bug fixes.
***We need your help! Please help us test this software.*** It is a
release candidate, so it may have a few glitches, but it has been tested
for regressions and fo
Jerry Feldman wrote:
> Now, other things seem to be misbehaving with Thunderbird.
> First, I've had top running and when it seems to freeze, I'm seeing
> Thunderbird taking about 100% of the CPU. So it seems that T-Bird gets
you are starting to see reasons i am glad i am still running 2.0.0.24.
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
>On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 12:17 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve Underwood wrote:
>> >This is what they released last week, and its by far their buggiest
>> >effort to date.
>> >
>> >Steve
>>
>> I believe this may b
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote:
>On 6/16/2010 12:17 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve Underwood wrote:
>>> On 06/16/2010 09:55 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
>>>
>>> This is what they released last week, and its by far their buggiest
>>> effort to date.
>>
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 12:17 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve Underwood wrote:
> >This is what they released last week, and its by far their buggiest
> >effort to date.
> >
> >Steve
> >
> I believe this may be a newer build. Not extensively checked, but it played
> a c
On 6/16/2010 12:17 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve Underwood wrote:
>> On 06/16/2010 09:55 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
>>
>> This is what they released last week, and its by far their buggiest
>> effort to date.
>>
>> Steve
>>
> I believe this may be a newer build.
Hi all,
Problem: on F13 icons for links and files are wrong.
I did a fresh install of F13 x86_64 and updated it. I copied back some
links that I had on my F12 Desktop. Links are URL's dragged from the
Firefox address bar to the Desktop. The problem is that the icon for the
links is a blank she
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 21:33:28 +0530,
Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> http://www.fedoraguide.info/index.php?title=Fedora11#How_to_disable_Ctrl.2BAlt.2BDel_from_restarting_computer_in_Console_mode
>
> says something wrong, becoz the line:
>
> ca:12345:ctrlaltdel:/sbin/shutdown -t1 -a -r now
>
> does
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve Underwood wrote:
>On 06/16/2010 09:55 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
>> This security update has just been released:
>>
>> http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/thankyou/?installer=Flash_Player_10.1_f
>>or_Linux_(.rpm)
>>
>> This will download flash-plugin-10.1.53.64-
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
>This security update has just been released:
>
>http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/thankyou/?installer=Flash_Player_10.1_for
>_Linux_(.rpm)
>
>This will download flash-plugin-10.1.53.64-release.i386.rpm. I don't yet
>know how stable this will
On 06/16/2010 11:52 AM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> that's correct, but if it possible to get /download that video from the
> terminal? like by typing the URL containing the video or fetch video id.
> or something like that and than downloading, though GUI downloader
> plugin does that.
>
> thx tim.
>
> One possible issue is that some stuff moved from /etc/event.d to /etc/init
> relatively silently at one of the upgrades. It looks like
> /etc/init/control-alt-delete.conf now controls what to do after a c-a-d
> is trapped. I don't know what controls whether or not c-a-d gets trapped
> in the fi
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 08:21 -0700, Alan Evans wrote:
>> "Windows Printer via SAMBA" is not on the list of options.
>
> Perhaps that's the problem. Install the 'samba-client' package and try
> again.
That did it. Thanks!
-Alan
--
users mailing
> There are "download helper" plug-ins that you can install in the Firefox
> web browser, and for other browsers, too, that let you save content from
> some sites, such as YouTube. There's one that's actually called
> "DownloadHelper" which does that, as well as offering to convert
> downloaded me
On 06/15/2010 07:20 PM, Steven Jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed with, "yum -y install 389-ds"
>
> I have started the console with, /usr/bin/389-console
>
> under the Server group folder I have "Administration Server" and "Directory
> Server" (hostname)
>
> Clicking on either of these gives me a
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 08:21 -0700, Alan Evans wrote:
> "Windows Printer via SAMBA" is not on the list of options.
Perhaps that's the problem. Install the 'samba-client' package and try
again.
There's an open bug report about installing that package automatically:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
>> I should have said that the only reason this slightly annoys me
>> is that these warnings come up several times a day
>> in the logwatch on the server.
>>
>> I guess the simplest solution would be to give a fixed address
>> on my LAN to this blackberry, in /etc/dhcpd.conf on
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> It didn't find any SMB shares there. Did you apply the package updates
> first? I ask because an updated F-13 system-config-printer package can
> adjust the firewall appropriately for you.
The system is fully updated. FIrewall is disabled.
>
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, William John Murray wrote:
>
> Hello all,
> I run openafs on my Fedora laptop. Works very nicely.
> However, there is one problem: the startup scripts come up before NM has
> had a chance to open any interfaces, so it seems no internet and
> switches off at boot ti
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Did you remember to poke a hole in your firewall?
Sorry, forgot to mention: Firewall is disabled.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
On 06/16/2010 09:55 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> This security update has just been released:
>
> http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/thankyou/?installer=Flash_Player_10.1_for_Linux_(.rpm)
>
> This will download flash-plugin-10.1.53.64-release.i386.rpm. I don't yet
> know how stable this will b
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 07:37 -0700, Alan Evans wrote:
> I go to System->Administration->Printing and select Add. Then I'm
> asked to provide my root password twice -- what's up with that?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596711
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Printing/ConfigurationTool#P
Unless RedHat has cleaned up their act, RH support is a, well, joke.
The CentOS forums are a much better way to go.
It has been a couple of years since I tried to do so, but setting up a
central CentOS updates repository is trivial. Setting up one with RH is
a bit of a chore and one has to won
On 06/15/2010 02:39 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> On 06/15/2010 02:35 PM, g wrote:
>
>>> ok, take thunderbird out of as much background mode as possible.
>>>
>>> next time you are going to be composing emails, put thunderbird offline,
>>> disable auto save, then start composing.
>>>
>>> if you stil
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 09:35 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Agreed, but it's worth mentioning that CentOS tracks RHEL releases and
> is available at no cost (and consequently no paid support).
As my boss said it when I presented the budget forecast for my RHEL
licenses; "It's less than the rou
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Alan Evans wrote:
> The hard drive on my F12 system recently failed, and I decided it was
> easiest to simply start from scratch. So what I'm dealing with now is
> a clean install of F13 from DVD, updated. The printer in our office is
> shared from a well-establish
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
