Re: nvidia quadro broken after recent update

On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 07:54 -0700, David L wrote: > I think I'm using the xorg-x11-drv-nv driver, not the nouveau > driver after running system-config-display. The xorg.conf that > system-config-display creates has a section that looks like this: > > Section "Device" > Identifier "Videocar

Re: firefox

On 04/12/2010 10:55 AM, Andre Goree wrote: > Which parts, exactly, are unacceptable? I'd hope you aren't referring > to the mess that happened when Chrome first came out, since that was > ratified 2 days later and Google admitted their mistake in having that > part in the EULA. > Have you r

Re: Yum Update - Metadata does not match checksum [Solved]

Am Sonntag, den 11.04.2010, 10:50 +0200 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > Changing the hosts file and entries for "localhost" is very unlikely to > fix your issues. > > It seems to me you're facing some sort of network data corruption. > Firefox running into error conditions is another indication of ne

Re: firefox

Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 04/12/2010 06:20 AM, Mail Lists wrote: >> On 04/11/2010 08:46 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> >> >>> I don't have any memory problems with Firefox. I am also uninterested >>> in switching to a proprietary browser. I have Chromium running on my >>> system to evaluate pro

Re: Need help with clamav-0.96

On 04/11/2010 10:55 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote: > I'm running F10 so I can't expect much help, but the 0.94 version of clamav is > about to go defunct. I successfully built 0.96 but now when I start it up I > get this message: > > [r...@saturn test]# clamscan --debug clam-v*.rar sendme > LibClamAV de

Re: Need help with clamav-0.96

--- On Sun, 4/11/10, Steven W. Orr wrote: > From: Steven W. Orr > Subject: Need help with clamav-0.96 > To: "Fedora List" > Date: Sunday, April 11, 2010, 7:55 PM > I'm running F10 so I can't expect > much help, but the 0.94 version of clamav is > about to go defunct. I successfully built 0.96

Need help with clamav-0.96

I'm running F10 so I can't expect much help, but the 0.94 version of clamav is about to go defunct. I successfully built 0.96 but now when I start it up I get this message: [r...@saturn test]# clamscan --debug clam-v*.rar sendme LibClamAV debug: searching for unrar, user-searchpath: /usr/lib LibCl

Re: firefox

On 04/11/2010 05:12 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote: > On 04/11/2010 05:05 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > >> On Sunday 11 April 2010 04:50 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote: >> >> >>> You can create a file in yum.repos.d with the following content: >>> >>> [flash] >>> name=flash >>> baseurl=http://www.dfm.unins

Re: firefox

On 04/11/2010 04:43 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Sunday 11 April 2010 04:32 PM, Michael Miles wrote: > >> On 04/11/2010 04:23 PM, Frank Cox wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 16:19 -0700, Michael Miles wrote: >>> >>> It's the flashplayer again so I need 32 bit firefox on a 64

Re: firefox

On 04/11/2010 04:43 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Sunday 11 April 2010 04:32 PM, Michael Miles wrote: > >> On 04/11/2010 04:23 PM, Frank Cox wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 16:19 -0700, Michael Miles wrote: >>> >>> It's the flashplayer again so I need 32 bit firefox on a 64

Re: firefox

On 04/11/2010 05:46 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 04/12/2010 06:02 AM, Mail Lists wrote: > >> On 04/11/2010 08:26 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> >> >> >>> Quick note: Firefox 3.6.x will be pushed out as an update in sometime, >>> features out of progress plugins. Essentially, if Flash or

Re: firefox

> >> I don't have any memory problems with > Firefox. I am also uninterested > >> in switching to a proprietary browser. I > have Chromium running on my > >> system to evaluate progress. > >> > > Whatever works for you ... chromium > has some problems however so not a > > good test of goog

Re: firefox

On 04/12/2010 06:20 AM, Mail Lists wrote: > On 04/11/2010 08:46 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > >> I don't have any memory problems with Firefox. I am also uninterested >> in switching to a proprietary browser. I have Chromium running on my >> system to evaluate progress. >> > Whatever wo

Re: firefox

On 04/11/2010 08:46 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > I don't have any memory problems with Firefox. I am also uninterested > in switching to a proprietary browser. I have Chromium running on my > system to evaluate progress. Whatever works for you ... chromium has some problems however so not a go

Re: firefox

On 04/12/2010 06:02 AM, Mail Lists wrote: > On 04/11/2010 08:26 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > >> Quick note: Firefox 3.6.x will be pushed out as an update in sometime, >> features out of progress plugins. Essentially, if Flash or any other >> plugin crashes on that version onwards, it will no

Re: firefox

On 04/11/2010 08:35 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: >>Or just switch to google-chrome - its way way faster and doesn't crash >> or suck memory up like there's no tomorrow. > > On my system its the exact opposite! I'm on 64 bit F11. > I use the 64 bit google-chrome beta too but on f12 ... using sun ja

Re: firefox

On Sunday 11 April 2010 05:32 PM, Mail Lists wrote: > On 04/11/2010 08:26 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Quick note: Firefox 3.6.x will be pushed out as an update in sometime, >> features out of progress plugins. Essentially, if Flash or any other >> plugin crashes on that version onwards, it wi

Re: firefox

On Sunday 11 April 2010 05:12 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote: > On 04/11/2010 05:05 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: >> On Sunday 11 April 2010 04:50 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote: >> >>> You can create a file in yum.repos.d with the following content: >>> >>> [flash] >>> name=flash >>> baseurl=http://www.dfm.uninsubria

Re: firefox

On 04/11/2010 08:26 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Quick note: Firefox 3.6.x will be pushed out as an update in sometime, > features out of progress plugins. Essentially, if Flash or any other > plugin crashes on that version onwards, it will not take down the > entire browser anymore. You can si

Re: firefox

On 04/12/2010 05:42 AM, Paolo Galtieri wrote: > > The safaribooksonline.com website uses flash heavily. In the past I > have had firefox crash repeatedly on this site. > Quick note: Firefox 3.6.x will be pushed out as an update in sometime, features out of progress plugins. Essentially, if

Re: firefox

On 04/11/2010 05:05 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Sunday 11 April 2010 04:50 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote: > >> You can create a file in yum.repos.d with the following content: >> >> [flash] >> name=flash >> baseurl=http://www.dfm.uninsubria.it/compiz/fusion-testing/flashplayer.x86_64/ >> enabled=1 >>

Re: firefox

On Sunday 11 April 2010 04:50 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote: > You can create a file in yum.repos.d with the following content: > > [flash] > name=flash > baseurl=http://www.dfm.uninsubria.it/compiz/fusion-testing/flashplayer.x86_64/ > enabled=1 > gpgcheck=1 > gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-leig

Re: firefox

On 04/11/2010 04:32 PM, Michael Miles wrote: > On 04/11/2010 04:23 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > >> On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 16:19 -0700, Michael Miles wrote: >> >> >>> It's the flashplayer again so I need 32 bit firefox on a 64 bit fedora >>> 12 >>> >>> >> Why not use the 64-bit flash play

Re: firefox

On Sunday 11 April 2010 04:32 PM, Michael Miles wrote: > On 04/11/2010 04:23 PM, Frank Cox wrote: >> On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 16:19 -0700, Michael Miles wrote: >> >>> It's the flashplayer again so I need 32 bit firefox on a 64 bit fedora >>> 12 >>> >> Why not use the 64-bit flash player and avoid the

Re: firefox

On 04/11/2010 04:23 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 16:19 -0700, Michael Miles wrote: > >> It's the flashplayer again so I need 32 bit firefox on a 64 bit fedora >> 12 >> > Why not use the 64-bit flash player and avoid the grief? > Where do I get the 64 bit version All I

Re: firefox

On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 16:19 -0700, Michael Miles wrote: > It's the flashplayer again so I need 32 bit firefox on a 64 bit fedora > 12 Why not use the 64-bit flash player and avoid the grief? -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com -- users mailing list users@lists.

firefox

My system updated the firefox back to 64 bit I can remove it but I cant fint the firefox 32 bit package How do I 1. get the right 32 bit package 2. browse repo listings through yum It's the flashplayer again so I need 32 bit firefox on a 64 bit fedora 12 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedora

Re: slow installing software

On 04/12/2010 09:09 AM, Michael Miles wrote: > I have noticed a huge slowdown with installing software from add/remove > software > > An abnormal amount of time resolving dependents > > Since the last kernel update today 2.6.32.11-99 > > Anyone else? > > > Michael > I gave up using . Where yum

slow installing software

I have noticed a huge slowdown with installing software from add/remove software An abnormal amount of time resolving dependents Since the last kernel update today 2.6.32.11-99 Anyone else? Michael -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription opti

Re: Installing Downloaded software

On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 15:37 -0700, Michael Miles wrote: > thats kind of why I said to do it from add/remove software Yes you did. I missed the first line of your message. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedorap

Re: Installing Downloaded software

On 04/11/2010 03:34 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 15:21 -0700, Michael Miles wrote: > >> On 04/11/2010 03:11 PM, Henry Wyatt wrote: >> >>> Need to know basics of how o install downloaded programs ie, Mozilla >>> Firefox 3.6 and Open Office, both files end in .gz

Re: Installing Downloaded software

On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 15:21 -0700, Michael Miles wrote: > On 04/11/2010 03:11 PM, Henry Wyatt wrote: > > Need to know basics of how o install downloaded programs ie, Mozilla > > Firefox 3.6 and Open Office, both files end in .gz > > > > -- > > Henry E Wyatt Jr > both those files can be installed

Re: Installing Downloaded software

Hi Henry, Fedora has excellent documentation. Since you are new you should go through this once. http://docs.fedoraproject.org/user-guide/f12/en-US/html/ On Sunday 11 April 2010 03:11 PM, Henry Wyatt wrote: > Need to know basics of how o install downloaded programs ie, Mozilla > Firefox 3.6 an

Re: Installing Downloaded software

On 04/11/2010 03:11 PM, Henry Wyatt wrote: > Need to know basics of how o install downloaded programs ie, Mozilla > Firefox 3.6 and Open Office, both files end in .gz > > -- > Henry E Wyatt Jr both those files can be installed via add/remove software in the system tab if you must just download

Re: modprobe problem

Hi, I have resolved the problem with modprob -a thanks for all 2010/4/11 Joseph L. Casale > >The module hasn't installed properly. Look at the README in the tarball:) > >Install is left to the op, which he hasn't done as his working dir is > >still in the compilation dir... > > My bad:) All t

Installing Downloaded software

Need to know basics of how o install downloaded programs ie, Mozilla Firefox 3.6 and Open Office, both files end in .gz -- Henry E Wyatt Jr -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users G

Re: FPL steps down: what's the real story?

On 04/09/2010 12:43 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > > Whether it's a laptop or a desktop, your computer is still a 32 bit. Strange - my desktop is 64 bit. But I used to have a 8 bit desktop at one time. So, what is your point? > It is also irrelevant to my demonstration. Until RHF proves the countrary,

Re: encfs unmounting with open fd

On 04/11/2010 01:28 PM, David L wrote: > I just started playing around with encfs and noticed > some behaviour that surprised me... not sure if > it's a bug or a bad design or if I have unreasonable > expectations. But if I mount a directory like this: > > encfs ~/.crypt ~/crypt > > Then start e

Re: Open Office 3.2 Issues in Fedora 12

Hello Alexis, On Sunday 11 April 2010, 17:51, Alexis Pardo wrote: > Thanks, Ariel: > > As you said, I'm using gnome under Fedora 12. My open office version is > 3.2. Please, look at the attached files. The second one (2.png) is my > problem. Look at these elements: menu bar, tool bar, scroll bars

Re: F12 Bug 540584 recrudesces -- Second Update : Surprise!

On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:38:29 + (UTC) BeartoothHOS wrote: > The present situation is just like the one, several releases > back, after installing or updating a release. Each machine had to have a > direct connection, free of the KVM switch, to autoconfigure X. I have to have my KVM swi

Re: Latest 2.6.33.1-24.fc13.x86_64 kernel still crashes on shutdown

Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 04/11/2010 02:15 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> I see all the reports of crash on shutdown have been marked as duplicates of >> 572868, but the latest kernel didn't help (I misunderstood "there's a patch" >> to >> mean "which fixes the problem") so if you test 64 bit fc13

Re: F12 Bug 540584 recrudesces -- Second Update : Surprise!

On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:01:30 +, BeartoothHOS wrote: On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:58:53 +, I Beartooth wrote: > [] > I've now established that all three machines run fine while out > from behind the KVM switch, as expected. > > Next I'll try rebooting them all, while back

Re: Fedora 12 Update Error

Yes it did,thanks you are a genius! Henry On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Sawrub wrote: > On 04/11/2010 08:47 PM, Henry Wyatt wrote: > > How do I become superuser "root" ? > > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 08:20:20 -0400, Henry wrote: >> >

Re: F12 Bug 540584 recrudesces -- Update

On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:58:53 +, I Beartooth wrote: [] > Yesterday having been a large occasion here, I have not yet tried > to ssh into a machine behind the switch from one not behind it. Even > before that, I want to make sure all machines still work normally when > not behin

Re: Open Office 3.2 Issues in Fedora 12

Hello Suvayu, On Sunday 11 April 2010, 16:06, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Sunday 11 April 2010 11:26 AM, Alexis Pardo wrote: > > Hello Ariel: > > > > I'm using the .tar.gz version of OOo 3.2. My desktop is gnome and it's > > under Fedora 12. > > > > What do you mean when you mention "the version comp

Re: Open Office 3.2 Issues in Fedora 12

On Sunday 11 April 2010 11:26 AM, Alexis Pardo wrote: > Hello Ariel: > > I'm using the .tar.gz version of OOo 3.2. My desktop is gnome and it's > under Fedora 12. > > What do you mean when you mention "the version compiled by OOo engineers"? > > is this the version? > > http://download.services.ope

RE: modprobe problem

>The module hasn't installed properly. Look at the README in the tarball:) >Install is left to the op, which he hasn't done as his working dir is >still in the compilation dir... My bad:) All this html/post craziness left me skimming through this to quickly. Seems he has copied it over. Does it w

RE: modprobe problem

>Excellent suggestion. That should take care of the problem if the module >installed correctly. The module hasn't installed properly. Look at the README in the tarball:) Install is left to the op, which he hasn't done as his working dir is still in the compilation dir... -- users mailing list u

Re: modprobe problem

--- On Sun, 4/11/10, François Patte wrote: > From: François Patte > Subject: Re: modprobe problem > To: "Community support for Fedora users" > Date: Sunday, April 11, 2010, 10:48 AM > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Le 11/04/2010 19:24, Adel ESSAFI a écrit : > > Thanks fo

Re: modprobe problem

What version of Fedora are you using? -Inline Attachment Follows- -- Looks like Fedora 12: From /lib/modules/2.6.32.10-90.fc12.i686 Regards, Antonio -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedora

encfs unmounting with open fd

I just started playing around with encfs and noticed some behaviour that surprised me... not sure if it's a bug or a bad design or if I have unreasonable expectations. But if I mount a directory like this: encfs ~/.crypt ~/crypt Then start editing a file in ~/crypt... eg: emacs ~/crypt/foo & T

Open Office 3.2 Issues in Fedora 12

Hello Ariel: I'm using the .tar.gz version of OOo 3.2. My desktop is gnome and it's under Fedora 12. What do you mean when you mention "the version compiled by OOo engineers"? is this the version? http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/localized/es/3.2.0/OOo_3.2.0_LinuxIntel_install_es.t

Re: modprobe problem

On 04/11/2010 09:02 PM, Adel ESSAFI wrote: F12 2010/4/11 Aioanei Rares > On 04/11/2010 08:39 PM, Adel ESSAFI wrote: 2010/4/11 Adel ESSAFI mailto:adeless...@gmail.com>> Thanks for replay [r...@localhost stk11xx-2.1.0]# cp /hom

Re: Amarok 2.3: how to change playlist order

On 10/04/10 15:39, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 08:38 +0100, Andrea wrote: >> On 06/04/10 16:47, Rex Dieter wrote: >>> Andrea wrote: >>> Can you choose where to drop them? In which position of the playlist? I cant. >>> >>> Yes, works fine here. Once I hover, there's

Re: modprobe problem

F12 2010/4/11 Aioanei Rares > On 04/11/2010 08:39 PM, Adel ESSAFI wrote: > > > > 2010/4/11 Adel ESSAFI > >> Thanks for replay >> >> [r...@localhost stk11xx-2.1.0]# cp /home/adel/stk11xx-2.1.0/stk11xx.ko >> /lib/modules/2.6.32.10-90.fc12.i686/kernel/drivers/media/video/ >> >> [r...@localhost st

Re: modprobe problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 11/04/2010 19:24, Adel ESSAFI a écrit : > Thanks for replay > > [r...@localhost stk11xx-2.1.0]# cp /home/adel/stk11xx-2.1.0/stk11xx.ko > /lib/modules/2.6.32.10-90.fc12.i686/kernel/drivers/media/video/ > [r...@localhost stk11xx-2.1.0]# modprobe stk1

Re: modprobe problem

On 04/11/2010 08:39 PM, Adel ESSAFI wrote: 2010/4/11 Adel ESSAFI mailto:adeless...@gmail.com>> Thanks for replay [r...@localhost stk11xx-2.1.0]# cp /home/adel/stk11xx-2.1.0/stk11xx.ko /lib/modules/2.6.32.10-90.fc12.i686/kernel/drivers/media/video/ [r...@localhost stk11xx-

Re: modprobe problem

2010/4/11 Adel ESSAFI > Thanks for replay > > [r...@localhost stk11xx-2.1.0]# cp /home/adel/stk11xx-2.1.0/stk11xx.ko > /lib/modules/2.6.32.10-90.fc12.i686/kernel/drivers/media/video/ > > [r...@localhost stk11xx-2.1.0]# modprobe stk11xx fps=30 > FATAL: Module stk11xx not found. > > > I tryed this,

Re: modprobe problem

Thanks for replay [r...@localhost stk11xx-2.1.0]# cp /home/adel/stk11xx-2.1.0/stk11xx.ko /lib/modules/2.6.32.10-90.fc12.i686/kernel/drivers/media/video/ [r...@localhost stk11xx-2.1.0]# modprobe stk11xx fps=30 FATAL: Module stk11xx not found. I tryed this, but still fails 2010/4/11 Patrick O'C

Re: modprobe problem

On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 19:05 +0200, Adel ESSAFI wrote: > Dear list > > I am trying to install syntex webcam driver, I have compiled the > kernel module but failed to load him. > > Can you help me please > > regards > > > > [r...@localhost stk11xx-2.1.0]# ls *.ko > stk11xx.ko > [r...@localhost

Re: modprobe problem

On 04/11/2010 08:05 PM, Adel ESSAFI wrote: > Dear list > > I am trying to install syntex webcam driver, I have compiled the > kernel module but failed to load him. > > Can you help me please > > regards > > > > [r...@localhost stk11xx-2.1.0]# ls *.ko > stk11xx.ko > [r...@localhost stk11xx-2.1.0]#

RE: modprobe problem

>Dear list > >I am trying to install syntex webcam driver, I have compiled the kernel module >but failed to load him. > >Can you help me please > >regards > > > >[r...@localhost stk11xx-2.1.0]# ls *.ko >stk11xx.ko >[r...@localhost stk11xx-2.1.0]# modprobe stk11xx fps=30 >FATAL: Module stk11xx not

modprobe problem

Dear list I am trying to install syntex webcam driver, I have compiled the kernel module but failed to load him. Can you help me please regards [r...@localhost stk11xx-2.1.0]# ls *.ko stk11xx.ko [r...@localhost stk11xx-2.1.0]# modprobe stk11xx fps=30 FATAL: Module stk11xx not found. --

Re: Fedora 12 Update Error

On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 18:28 +0300, Aioanei Rares wrote: > su - [enter password] && yum update yum\* PackageKit\* Wrong. Executing su gets a new shell, which will not read the rest of the line. On terminating that shell, the original shell will try to execute the rest of the line and fail since it'

Re: Fedora 12 Update Error

On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 08:49:36 -0700, Marvin wrote: > On 4/11/10, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 08:20:20 -0400, Henry wrote: > > > >> Just installed Fedora 12, much better than other operating systems. I am > >> new to this and have the following problem. I cannot update software

Re: Fedora 12 Update Error

On Sunday 11 April 2010 08:49 AM, Marvin Kosmal wrote: > On 4/11/10, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 08:20:20 -0400, Henry wrote: >> >>> Just installed Fedora 12, much better than other operating systems. I am >>> new to this and have the following problem. I cannot update softwar

Re: Fedora 12 Update Error

On 4/11/10, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 08:20:20 -0400, Henry wrote: > >> Just installed Fedora 12, much better than other operating systems. I am >> new to this and have the following problem. I cannot update software, >> update fails, I will send error mesage at next attempt

Re: Fedora 12 Update Error

On 04/11/2010 08:47 PM, Henry Wyatt wrote: How do I become superuser "root" ? On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Michael Schwendt > wrote: On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 08:20:20 -0400, Henry wrote: > Just installed Fedora 12, much better than other operating system

Re: Fedora 12 Update Error

On 04/11/2010 06:17 PM, Henry Wyatt wrote: How do I become superuser "root" ? On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Michael Schwendt > wrote: On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 08:20:20 -0400, Henry wrote: > Just installed Fedora 12, much better than other operating system

Re: Fedora 12 Update Error

How do I become superuser "root" ? On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 08:20:20 -0400, Henry wrote: > > > Just installed Fedora 12, much better than other operating systems. I am > > new to this and have the following problem. I cannot update software,

Re: Trying to play DVD video problems

On 04/11/2010 10:16 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > mplayer dvd:// > A whole lot of this; $ mplayer dvd:// MPlayer SVN-r29800-4.4.2 (C) 2000-2009 MPlayer Team mplayer: could not connect to socket mplayer: No such file or directory Failed to open LIRC support. You will not be able to use your remo

Re: Trying to play DVD video problems

On Sunday 11 April 2010 13:07:04 Aioanei Rares wrote: > On 04/10/2010 10:07 PM, Jim wrote: > > FC 12 /KDE/ X86_64 > > Trying to play a DVD videos the introduction of Video plays normal but > > when I click on play main video, sound breaks up and I get no Video. > > > > Libdvdcss is installed. > >

Re: VirtualBox is not started

On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 16:44 +0700, -andria- wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Paul Smith wrote: > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 6:19 AM, -andria- > wrote: > > $ uname -a > > Linux tambora 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE #1 SMP Sat Nov 7 > 21:25:57 EST 20

Re: Another yum update problem

On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 11:16 +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Sawrub wrote: > > try > > #yum clean all > > #yum clean metadata > > I guess "all" includes "metadata". I'd avoid the first if the second works. Correct. "yum clean all" will remove all your cached rpms,

F12 Bug 540584 recrudesces

RedHat Bugzilla Bug 540584 is suddenly biting again, harder than ever, since yesterday's PackageKit update on F12. Now, if behind the Trendnet TK-407 USB KVM switch, none of the three machines sees keyboard, mouse, nor even a login display. (I found a good home for the fourth m

Re: What is in include/linux/kernel.h line 158

On 10 April 2010 21:29, Antonio Olivares wrote: > Dear folks, > > I have encountered this so called sleeping function several times in a good > while > (kernel 2.6.27, 2.6.29, 2.6.30, 2.6.31, 2.6.32) Fedora based kernels and > compiled > kernels from kernel.org, > > I am asking this because I se

Re: Fedora 12 Update Error

On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 08:20:20 -0400, Henry wrote: > Just installed Fedora 12, much better than other operating systems. I am > new to this and have the following problem. I cannot update software, > update fails, I will send error mesage at next attempt to update. Might be an idea to open a term

Fedora 12 Update Error

Just installed Fedora 12, much better than other operating systems. I am new to this and have the following problem. I cannot update software, update fails, I will send error mesage at next attempt to update. -- Henry E Wyatt Jr -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: What is in include/linux/kernel.h line 158

On 04/10/2010 11:29 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote: > Dear folks, > > I have encountered this so called sleeping function several times in a good > while (kernel 2.6.27, 2.6.29, 2.6.30, 2.6.31, 2.6.32) Fedora based kernels > and compiled kernels from kernel.org, > > I am asking this because I see thi

Re: Trying to play DVD video problems

On 04/10/2010 10:07 PM, Jim wrote: > FC 12 /KDE/ X86_64 > Trying to play a DVD videos the introduction of Video plays normal but > when I click on play main video, sound breaks up and I get no Video. > > Libdvdcss is installed. > > Same results on mplayer, xine > > > Here is /var/log/messages on X

Re: [Fwd: Re: CD/DVD automount in Fedora 12]

> I gave up and reinstalled the system. I then ran 'yum update' and also > installed MythTV from rpmfusion. Then I checked if automount works - > and it didn't! It is the same behavior with symlinks disappearing > when inserting a disc. Same thing (sometimes) happens to me. I gave up and chimed in

Re: [Fwd: Re: CD/DVD automount in Fedora 12]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 11/04/2010 08:34, Andrew Junev a écrit : >> I just checked on my other machine (mythbackend), symlinks are always >> there - no matter if the disc is in the drive or not. > >> So the fact that symlinks disappear is probably somehow related to my >>

Re: VirtualBox is not started

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Paul Smith wrote: > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 6:19 AM, -andria- wrote: > > $ uname -a > > Linux tambora 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE #1 SMP Sat Nov 7 21:25:57 EST > 2009 > > i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux > >> > >> 在2010-04-10 11:11:53，-andria- 写道： > >> > >> Dear all, > >

Re: events/0 eats 50% CPU when Network Manager runs

On 04/11/2010 10:50 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote: > I have a Lenovo X61s with F12, kernel 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.i686.PAE > > I normally use Network Manager to manage the wireless, however, > recently my events/0 process is using 50% CPU time (measured with top -d > 60). Booting kernels 2.6.32.10-90.fc12.i6

Re: Another yum update problem

On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Sawrub wrote: > try > #yum clean all > #yum clean metadata I guess "all" includes "metadata". I'd avoid the first if the second works. -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna -- users mailing list users@lists

events/0 eats 50% CPU when Network Manager runs

I have a Lenovo X61s with F12, kernel 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.i686.PAE I normally use Network Manager to manage the wireless, however, recently my events/0 process is using 50% CPU time (measured with top -d 60). The load stays high even if I disable the wireless and remove the iwlagn module. The machi

Re: Yum Update - Metadata does not match checksum

On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:26:08 +0200, Melanie wrote: > Am Samstag, den 10.04.2010, 15:52 -0700 schrieb Craig White: > > On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 00:02 +0200, Melanie wrote: > > > Am Samstag, den 10.04.2010, 12:47 -0700 schrieb Craig White: > > > > > Hi Craig! > > > > > > I am using the ext4 filesyste

Re: Deleting all image files with "small" keyword

On 11Apr2010 07:54, Joachim Backes wrote: | On 04/11/2010 01:04 AM, Leonard Adjei wrote: | >using | > sudo find AUDIO/ -name \*Small\*.jpg -exec rm {} \; | >worked fine for me. | > | >Thanks | | this will run the rm command separately for *each found* "small".jpg file. | | Probably faster: |

Re: Another yum update problem

On 04/11/2010 05:11 AM, david walcroft wrote: > I'm using FC12 i386 a fresh install, when trying to update all > programmes or individually I get this error. > > [da...@reddwarf ~]$ sudo yum update yum > Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit > fedora/metalink >

Re: Yum Update - Metadata does not match checksum

Am Samstag, den 10.04.2010, 15:52 -0700 schrieb Craig White: > On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 00:02 +0200, Melanie wrote: > > Am Samstag, den 10.04.2010, 12:47 -0700 schrieb Craig White: > > > Hi Craig! > > > > I am using the ext4 filesystem. > > > > To edit config files I just use "vi". > > > > I kno

Re: Thunderbird to Firefox url link

On 04/11/2010 05:18 AM, david walcroft wrote: > A fresh install of FC12 i386 and the link between a url in > thunderbird does not bring up that url in firefox. I don't know how the > link works ,can somebody help > > Thanks david > Launch TB and select Edit ->Preferences , On the far right and