Hello
find /etc -size -1G
should return all files less than 1Giga byte in /etc, but return a
list of empty file (size=0)
find /etc -size -2G
work fine and return all the files
This works the same on my fedora11 and my centos 5 !
Did I miss something or is it a bug ?
Regards
--
Alain Spineu
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 18:47 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Ahh, the old "not using the latest version" trick.
Is that said with a Maxwell Smart or Inspector Clouseau voice? ;-)
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox
Since nobody seemed to report a problem playing DVDs, I decided to check my
settings.
Smplayer and Gmplayer were both set to play DVDs from /dev/dvd
I checked and there was no /dev/dvd. So, I did:
ls -l /dev/dvd*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 3 2010-03-24 12:52 /dev/dvd1 -> sr0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root
"On 01:22:23 pm Michael Miles said"
>
> Is there no way to get those custom libs off ?
>
> I know I had to completely wipe my machine and I had 4 tbit to loose
> Tell me I was not choked?
>
> It was exactly the same thing
>
> Black screen and no way to recover.
>
> Just remember Install fc12
> Ad
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:02:16 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 02:10 +, Vitorio Okio wrote:
>> > I'm new to Fedora and cannot figure it out myself, need you help,
>> folks.
>>
>> I've solved it. The problem had nothing to do either with Fedora or
>> SELenux but silly m
Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law
On 3/24/10, Roger wrote:
> On 03/24/2010 05:45 PM, charles zeitler wrote:
>> how's this for a hypothetical:
>>
>> some person (let's call him 'Marcel') enters his BIOS, (maybe makes
>> some changes), invokes password protection& reboots.
>>
>> s
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 02:10 +, Vitorio Okio wrote:
> > I'm new to Fedora and cannot figure it out myself, need you help,
> folks.
>
> I've solved it. The problem had nothing to do either with Fedora or
> SELenux but silly me. :-)
If you post a message entitled SOLVED you might give a little
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:48:05 +, Vitorio Okio wrote:
> I have 3 PCs running Hardy, Karmic, and Fedora 12, with Firefox on each
> of them: v. 3.0.18 on Hardy and v. 3.5.8 on both Karmic and Fedora.
>
> I created "shared" profile on each system and synchronize them using
> Unison. Ubuntu 8.04 is
Hello,
on my F12 x86_64 I have libgpod at level libgpod-0.7.2-8.fc12.x86_64 (as
from offical repo)
it seems from http://www.libimobiledevice.org/ that to manage iPod 3G/GS I
need >= 0.7.90
running the command
# yum update --enablerepo rawhide libgpod
I get
--> Running transaction check
---> Pack
On 03/24/2010 04:09 PM, Elliott Chapin wrote:
> Apology if this is old news:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py", line 391, in
> _do_search
> for (pkg, inst) in res:
> ValueError: too many values to unpack
>
>
Same problem he
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 18:39 +, mike cloaked wrote:
> Well guys, the mystery has resolved itself with the only action by me
> being an update at the TB end
Ahh, the old "not using the latest version" trick.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change sub
Apology if this is old news:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py", line 391, in
_do_search
for (pkg, inst) in res:
ValueError: too many values to unpack
--
Elliott Chapin
http://clients.teksavvy.com/~echapin
--
users mailing list
us
> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 13:33 +, T. Horsnell wrote:
>> Sorry people, I've just found a likely reference in Bugzilla.
>> Please ignore the stuff below for now...
>> Terry
>>
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> I'm using the Live version of FC12 to produce a bootable clone of an idle
>>> FC12
>>> system to a USB
On Wednesday 24 March 2010 03:29:06 am Tim wrote:
> A release or two back, that was the case. But since then, there's been
> movement against it as the protests stacked up by those who don't want
> to have anything with a Microsoft taint to it).
until MS buys up Novell - maybe be an internet phan
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 13:33 +, T. Horsnell wrote:
> Sorry people, I've just found a likely reference in Bugzilla.
> Please ignore the stuff below for now...
> Terry
>
>
> > Hi all,
> > I'm using the Live version of FC12 to produce a bootable clone of an idle
> > FC12
> > system to a USB stic
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:44:36 -0700,
Rick Stevens wrote:
>
> On the other hand, a partition table doesn't take any capacity away
> from a drive so there's really no need to skip partitioning other than
> laziness. :-) (and yes, I can be a lazy cuss)
This can make a difference for live usb
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:39 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> Well guys, the mystery has resolved itself with the only action by me
> being an update at the TB end - before doing the tests that were
> suggested I updated my version of TB - to Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux
> i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.2pre) Geck
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 14:18 -0400, gene.po...@macys.com wrote:
> Will Fedora ever have an install selection like RHEL or CentOS where
> you can select 'Server' and/or 'Server GUI'?
You can choose NOT to install a GUI; kickstart can be used to configure
machines uniformly.
What's your underlying
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 01:54 +1030, Tim wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 08:27 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> > possibly somewhere along the line the HTML is being reflowed or in
>> > some way modified, which would destroy the signa
Will Fedora ever have an install selection like RHEL or CentOS where you
can select 'Server' and/or 'Server GUI'?
Thanks,
Gene Poole
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guideline
Tim:
>> We've seen plenty of plain text message parts being transcoded in
>> transit by some allegedly "helpful" mail server (turning quoted
>> printable into 8-bit, etc.). I wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised
>> at a mail server doing the same sort of thing to text/html content.
Patrick O'C
When this kernel came out there was many people with the same problem
and it was the kmod
akmod would be a better choice
What if you can't boot to older kernel as I could not.
the Add remove worked on the first try.
Allow the Nvidia to install the kernel and kmod
On 03/24/2010 10:32 AM, P
Do not wipe and reinstall!
If you can boot to runlevel 3, you can get out. Here's what I did:
Boot to working older kernel, runlevel 1 or 3 if needed.
'rpm -q kernel' will list the installed kernel packages, note the newest kernel.
'yum remove kernel-2.6.whatever.from.above' will remove that ke
On 03/24/2010 10:14 AM, ka1ifq wrote:
> "On 03:57:39 am Mogens Kjaer said"
>
>> On 03/24/2010 06:57 AM, ka1ifq wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>
>>> If the system boots to a black screen, how do you run the add / remove
>>> software??
>>>
>> Can't you boot into runlevel 3?
>>
>> Mogens
>>
>>
"On 03:57:39 am Mogens Kjaer said"
> On 03/24/2010 06:57 AM, ka1ifq wrote:
> ...
>
> > If the system boots to a black screen, how do you run the add / remove
> > software??
>
> Can't you boot into runlevel 3?
>
> Mogens
>
I could. I did try booting previous kernels from the list at boot, but it
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 22:12 +0530, rajendra choudhary wrote:
> please don't send me further any mail...
Please remove yourself using the instructions posted at the end of every
message on this list.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscriptio
On 03/23/2010 03:55 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> Hello,
> sorry for the off-topic.
> Tipically when I work with LVM on Linux (RHEL/CentOS 5 and/or Fedora
> 11/12), I create the physical volume directly on the whole disk.
> Historically one created a partition on the disk, eventually big as the
> wh
>
> > Am I missing something? Anyone else have a cleaner way
> > of determining that it's a grace period login?
> I think it should return the pwexpired control. But according to this
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-behera-ldap-password-policy-10#section-7.4
> you should be able to determine h
please don't send me further any mail...
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
--- On Wed, 3/24/10, Thufir wrote:
> It seems impossible to upgrade FC5
> without a clean install -- is that
> essentially correct? If I did decide to stick with
> FC5, how, generally,
> would I go about installing java or other rpm's?
> Manually downloading?
By "upgrade", do you mean "updat
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 01:54 +1030, Tim wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 08:27 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > possibly somewhere along the line the HTML is being reflowed or in
> > some way modified, which would destroy the signature. I can't really
> > see how that could happen
>
> We've seen
On 03/23/2010 10:57 PM, ka1ifq wrote:
> "On 10:17:38 pm Michael Miles said"
>
>> Here is how I got the latest update in with 190.53 nvidia driver
>>
>> Install the driver from add remove software not yum
>>
> If the system boots to a black screen, how do you run the add / remove
> softwa
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 08:27 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> possibly somewhere along the line the HTML is being reflowed or in
> some way modified, which would destroy the signature. I can't really
> see how that could happen
We've seen plenty of plain text message parts being transcoded in
tr
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 08:12 +, mike cloaked wrote:
>> I do now know that if sending a plaintext mail from Evo to TB then the
>> signature verifies just fine, but changing to sending HTML but
>> otherwise leaving everything else the
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 10:59 +, John Austin wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have submitted a buzilla to sourceforge re dump/restore
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2964667&group_id=1306&atid=101306
>
> John
>
>
This problem has now been fixed in CVS!
>From Stelian
Date: 2010-03-19
On 03/24/2010 07:46 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> One of the things
> that Ubuntu brings to the table is a timely notification that the new
> release is available as a popup notification on the routine update. I
> don't recall if a similar one is in Fedora 12.
Yes, there is, via PackageKit.
Rahul
-
On 03/24/2010 04:34 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 06:49:43 + (UTC)
> Thufir wrote:
>
>
>> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:56:08 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
>>
>>
I guess what I am saying is there needs to be a way for the new user to
keep their machine updated without all t
On 03/23/2010 05:27 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> Which is another reason to back up your system. REGULARLY! If the
> defecation hits the impeller, you can restore.
>
I love your analogy but fully agree. Today, with low cost drives, a
regular backup is always a good alternative. We can debate wher
Quoting Thufir :
> It seems impossible to upgrade FC5 without a clean install -- is that
> essentially correct? If I did decide to stick with FC5, how, generally,
> would I go about installing java or other rpm's? Manually downloading?
>
> Can I connect up FC5 with:
>
> http://livna-dl.reloumirr
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 08:12 +, mike cloaked wrote:
> I do now know that if sending a plaintext mail from Evo to TB then the
> signature verifies just fine, but changing to sending HTML but
> otherwise leaving everything else the same then TB says it is a BAD
> signature. The question I do not
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 19:59 +1100, Roger wrote:
> On 03/24/2010 05:45 PM, charles zeitler wrote:
> > how's this for a hypothetical:
> >
> > some person (let's call him 'Marcel') enters his BIOS, (maybe makes
> > some changes), invokes password protection& reboots.
> >
> > some time later, he insta
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 18:04 +1030, Tim wrote:
> Tim:
> >> Is there a switch I am missing because I did not look deep
> >> enough or is it that Evolution just can't do PGP/Mime??
>
> Patrick O'Callaghan:
> > At the moment you can't. There's been a lot of resistance to it as
> > it's non-standard
>
On 03/23/2010 10:01 PM, Vitorio Okio wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:48:05 +, Vitorio Okio wrote:
>
>
>> I have 3 PCs running Hardy, Karmic, and Fedora 12, with Firefox on each
>> of them: v. 3.0.18 on Hardy and v. 3.5.8 on both Karmic and Fedora.
>>
>> I created "shared" profile on each sy
Am Mittwoch, den 24.03.2010, 07:07 + schrieb Thufir:
> It seems impossible to upgrade FC5 without a clean install -- is that
> essentially correct?
It all depends on time. If you want to spent days fixing upgrade issues
between versions, no. If you want to write "yum upgrade f12", yes.
> If
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 21:37:04 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 03/24/2010 01:26 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > Forgive my ignorance, but what is the story about RedHat, Gnome and Mono?
>
> There is no obvious link that explains everything so let me add my
> thoughts. Just to be clear, the following
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:24:39 +1030, Tim wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 07:07 +, Thufir wrote:
>> It seems impossible to upgrade FC5 without a clean install -- is that
>> essentially correct?
>
> Why don't you want to clean install? Someone may have a good answer to
> help you do it, or overc
On 03/24/2010 05:45 PM, charles zeitler wrote:
> how's this for a hypothetical:
>
> some person (let's call him 'Marcel') enters his BIOS, (maybe makes
> some changes), invokes password protection& reboots.
>
> some time later, he installs a fresh operating system. then he re-enters
> his BIOS (un
Hi, I have some queries which are showing in the logs as not being
indexed (notes=U right?). In the example below the accountid is indexed
but the authrole is not, but I would of expected the query to use the
accountid index?
conn=308 op=1 SRCH base="o=blah.com" scope=2
filter="(&(accountid=
On 03/24/2010 01:54 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
> KDE 3.5 -> 4 upgrade annoyed me to no end because KDE4 wasn't ready for
> prime time. The current version is pretty nice, but I've switched to XFCE.
>
> But that doesn't mean that all change is bad. For instance, upstart
> integration has been way b
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 06:49:43 + (UTC)
Thufir wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:56:08 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
>
> >> I guess what I am saying is there needs to be a way for the new user to
> >> keep their machine updated without all the headaches. This is why some
> >> will stick with Window
On 03/24/2010 01:00 AM, Tim wrote:
> The churn (change/turn) being the constant turning over, from one thing
> to another, whatever it was, and however you did it. Upgrade or
> re-install, it's still churning. The more annoying aspect of churn is
> how rapidly you had to go through it.
>
KDE
On 03/24/2010 12:32 AM, Thufir wrote:
> >From the post I was responding to, though, I infer that one cannot
> upgrade without re-installing (at least, reliably). I'll have to check
>
You can upgrade, and I've heard people claim that it works smoothly.
So far I've upgraded several times using
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> I just sent myself a plain text signed message from Evo and verified the
> signature using TBird. Looking at the raw file, it does indeed have
> a .asc attachment containing the signature, as per spec. I haven't tried
> it in HTML as
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:40:08 -0400, Gene wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:13:57 -0400, Gene wrote:
> >> [...] how then do I install grub in /dev/sdb1? Easier to
> >> reinstall, I want /root and /usr both on their own partitions anyway.
> >
> >Y
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 07:32 +, Thufir wrote:
> From the post I was responding to, though, I infer that one cannot
> upgrade without re-installing (at least, reliably). I'll have to
> check the documentation. Wasn't that the "churn"?
The churn (change/turn) being the constant turning over, f
On 03/24/2010 06:57 AM, ka1ifq wrote:
...
> If the system boots to a black screen, how do you run the add / remove
> software??
Can't you boot into runlevel 3?
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Mobil
2010/3/23 Natr Brazell
> I think I would understand it more if I understood the following sections:
>
> cacertfile = /usr/local/etc/freeradius/certs/CA_certif.crt
> (If I am doing testing how to I make this file)
>
>
>
It's the public certificate of the CA that has signed (in our
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 07:07 +, Thufir wrote:
> It seems impossible to upgrade FC5 without a clean install -- is that
> essentially correct?
Why don't you want to clean install? Someone may have a good answer to
help you do it, or overcome the problem.
Upgrades over the top often involve ho
Tim:
>> Is there a switch I am missing because I did not look deep
>> enough or is it that Evolution just can't do PGP/Mime??
Patrick O'Callaghan:
> At the moment you can't. There's been a lot of resistance to it as
> it's non-standard
Other way around...
PGP as a MIME part is a standard way to
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:59:24 -0700, Konstantin Svist wrote:
> On 03/23/2010 11:49 PM, Thufir wrote:
>> Exactly why I no longer run FC. The sole reason I use ubuntu is that
>> you can upgrade without re-installing. Why hasn't this been
>> implemented in FC yet?
>>
>>
> Probably because Fed
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 13:21 -0600, Robin Laing wrote:
> Late to the discussion but I prefer KDE over Gnome and with Novell's
> push to get more Mono into Gnome, I will avoid it.
A release or two back, that was the case. But since then, there's been
movement against it as the protests stacked up
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 21:05 +, mike cloaked wrote:
> in Thunderbird I have the option of sending PGP/mime - but I can't see
> how to do this in Evolution?
Evolution does do PGP mime (message and signature are different MIME
parts of the message), you just don't get options about *how* it's don
It seems impossible to upgrade FC5 without a clean install -- is that
essentially correct? If I did decide to stick with FC5, how, generally,
would I go about installing java or other rpm's? Manually downloading?
Can I connect up FC5 with:
http://livna-dl.reloumirrors.net/fedora/5/i386/
tha
On 03/24/2010 12:29 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
> On 03/23/2010 11:49 PM, Thufir wrote:
>
>> Exactly why I no longer run FC. The sole reason I use ubuntu is that you
>> can upgrade without re-installing. Why hasn't this been implemented in
>> FC yet?
>>
>>
> Probably because Fedora Cor
On 03/23/2010 11:49 PM, Thufir wrote:
> Exactly why I no longer run FC. The sole reason I use ubuntu is that you
> can upgrade without re-installing. Why hasn't this been implemented in
> FC yet?
>
Probably because Fedora Core isn't maintained anymore ;)
--
users mailing list
users@list
65 matches
Mail list logo
