EMI XSer 02, GSM DCS information

2010-08-16 Thread Emanuele Carbone
Hi guys, i have an issue with EMI protocol for the MO scenario. Sometimes my gateway receive message with binary body. When received this type of message, i found flags:-1:2:-1:0:-1 , with coding set to UCS-2, and the XSer field with this information, 020100. In the emi specification 4.0, i foun

Re: EMI XSer 02, GSM DCS information

2010-08-16 Thread Emanuele Carbone
our SMSc and ask them what value they are > sending for the Xser field. Else post detailed bb logs with the MO > reception. > > BR, > Nikos > - Original Message - From: Emanuele Carbone > To: users@kannel.org > Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 11:03 AM > Subject: EMI

Re: EMI XSer 02, GSM DCS information

2010-08-16 Thread Emanuele Carbone
sion (>1.4.1) it should be > converted to utf-8. Please post detailed smsbox logs showing the syntax > error along with the corresponding bb logs. This time give a few lines > context. > > > BR, > Nikos > - Original Message - From: Emanuele Carbone > To: Nik

Re: EMI XSer 02, GSM DCS information

2010-08-16 Thread Emanuele Carbone
ok... mo-recode should be the solution... 2010/8/16 Emanuele Carbone > Hi, > > i'll show you what i see: > kannel version: 1.4.3 > > received an emi packet: > > EMI2[4883883]: Got packet from the main socket > EMI2[4883883]: emi2 parsing packet: >

Re: EMI XSer 02, GSM DCS information

2010-08-17 Thread Emanuele Carbone
Hi Nikos, at the moment, i resolved with mo-recode that works perfectly. thanks for your support. regards 2010/8/16 Nikos Balkanas > You can also try &keyword=%k&text=%r to see if it helps... > > > BR, > Nikos > - Original Message ----- From: Emanuele Carbone

Re: Kannel for Italian mobile operator

2010-03-10 Thread Emanuele Carbone
Yes, it works! 2010/3/10 Francesco Perfetto > Dear Patrik, > > thanks for your reply. I would like to use Kannel for support of MO > and MT messages, so I have to manage the Pull and Push services. I am > developing a Gateway for Mobile Terminal communication, where Terminal > there can be send

Re: Duplicated FID (foreign_id)

2010-03-10 Thread Emanuele Carbone
> Does the duplicated FID happened on the same MSISDN? Yes. I had this problem with italian telco. Often the FID is the timestampand with high load telco can you return the same FID (at least in italy) 2010/3/11 sangprabv > Thanks for the correction ;) > > > > sangprabv > sangpr...@gmail.com >

Re: Concatenated SMS sending

2010-03-12 Thread Emanuele Carbone
Hi, yes with udh. check the option in the sendsms-user group. 2010/3/12 Sergii Dryga > Hello! > > Please help me to find an answer on the question about concatenated SMS > (long messages) sending. > > Does it possible to send concatenated SMS (long messages) via SMPP > connection using Kannel s

Re: SMSC status is ONLINE but MT are queued

2011-09-08 Thread Emanuele Carbone
ovider seam's to be ok (SMSC > status is ONLINE) but sms MT are queued in my server. > > I found this message in my bearerbox log: WARNING: Cannot find SMSCConn for > message to , rejected. > -- * EMANUELE CARBONE : SOFTWARE ENGINEER A-TONO TECHNOLOGY : VIA BATTELLO, 44 -

how to set data_coding on smpp

2012-04-05 Thread Emanuele Carbone
Hi guys, i have a trouble with my carrier. Through SMPP it support two charset: iso-8859-1 (default) and i must set data_coding to 0 and gsm 03.38 with data_coding set to 1 The problem is, how to set input params for obtain data_coding setted to 1? thanks a lot br

Re: how to set data_coding on smpp

2012-04-05 Thread Emanuele Carbone
up being irrelevant to my > concerns). > > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Emanuele Carbone wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> i have a trouble with my carrier. Through SMPP it support two charset: >> >> iso-8859-1 (default) and i must set data_coding to 0

smsc vs best performance

2012-12-19 Thread Emanuele Carbone
Hi guys, I would like to calculate the optimal number of smsc connections that my server can handle for better performance. Can anyone suggest the best way to determine this value? Thanks a lot. BR

minimum validity period

2015-08-31 Thread Emanuele Carbone
Hi guys, I'm experiencing a "Not accepted - Short message validity period under minimum" NACK for message with 1 minute as VP. Looking at UCP/EMI specification (in my case) and GSM protocol specification 03.40, i didn't found nothing. It's really a GSM limitation o carrier specific issue? Thank