Hi everyone,
I am running Kannel 1.4.3 in Fedora Core 10. For the moment, I am using a USB
GSM Modem and in my setting, I mapped the device to /dev/ttyUSB0. However, if I
unplugged and replug the GSM Modem to my PC, the port will change to ttyUSB1.
Therefore, my Kannel will not be able to loca
the KISS solution :
at the head of the kannel start/stop script include short bash script to detect
the latest device name of the modem
the script should remove if existing the old simlink and create new simlink to the real
usb device named like "/dev/MyUsbModem"
use that in the kannel config
Thanks for you immediate reply.
So you are saying that I should detect the device name and change the device
name in the kannel config accordingly?
I've tried to write a udev rule to map the usb port to use the port name
"/dev/GSMMODEM". It works well at first. When I unplug the modem, and re
i know udev rule is not reliable, because its executed at boot time
again,
parse the dmesg each time you start/stop kannel , reset proper simlink
and use cronted monitoring script to check the kannel state and according to
the state to use the start/stop srcipt
Dennis Low Weng Kin wrote:
Thanks
OK. I will try it.
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Low
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:25:44 +0300
> From: seik...@gmail.com
> CC: users@kannel.org
> Subject: Re: Unplugging USB GSM Modem and replugging
>
> i know udev rule is not reliable, because its executed at boot time
> again,
> parse the dmesg each
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 11:25, seikath wrote:
> i know udev rule is not reliable, because its executed at boot time
> again,
> parse the dmesg each time you start/stop kannel , reset proper simlink
> and use cronted monitoring script to check the kannel state and according to
> the state to use the
IMHO and based on my personal experience a serial modems is just what you
need. They are equally stable and 'fast'. Fast enough to manage your traffic
efficiently.
--
Kenny
e: ke...@nuobjects.com
w: www.nuObjects.com
Bulk SMS Solutions | Managed Hosting | Enterprise Application Development
On
Hi Milan,
Can you give me some guidance and link to accomplish what you've just mentioned?
Thanks in advance.
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:59:36 +0200
> From: m...@arvanta.net
> To: users@kannel.org
> Subject: Re: Unplugging USB GSM Modem and replugging
>
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 11:25, seikath
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 02:07, Dennis Low Weng Kin wrote:
> Can you give me some guidance and link to accomplish what you've just
> mentioned?
I don't have that for modem/phone or kannel but here is what I use for
mounting mp4 player (line from /etc/udev/rules.d/local.rules):
SUBSYSTEMS=="scsi", AT
There was a thread about this sometime ago. I'll try to look for it later.
Note that, for the workarround above, you might get into troubles if
you do have several equal usb modems.
Each modem will have its own sim with -maybe- different
carrier/service/plan/etc. With the above procedure, you wil
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 12:43, Alvaro Cornejo wrote:
> There was a thread about this sometime ago. I'll try to look for it later.
>
> Note that, for the workarround above, you might get into troubles if
> you do have several equal usb modems.
>
> Each modem will have its own sim with -maybe- differ
Thanks
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:44:46 +0200
> From: m...@arvanta.net
> To: users@kannel.org
> Subject: Re: Unplugging USB GSM Modem and replugging
>
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 12:43, Alvaro Cornejo wrote:
> > There was a thread about this sometime ago. I'll try to look for it later.
> >
> > No
I found the thread:
In kannel userlist the thread is called "Connecting USB GSM phones"
dated 8-10-06
Hope helps
Alvaro
|-|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y m
Hi All
I'm trying to migrate my kannel installation from fedora6 to fedora10,
but I when running ./configure it complains that the openssl I use is
not multithread
...
Configuring parameters ...
checking which malloc to use... native malloc
enabling local time
enabling cookies
enabling HTTP/1
hi there,
i've just received a report back from my aggregator that some of my
requests are coming through with "registered_delivery=0" in them which is
(alledgedly) causing droppage of large numbers of DLR messages.
i can't see anything about this in the userguide and what's most strange
is
Yeap,
That's about right. In most distros openssl is not multithrteaded. Download
latest sources and compile with:
config threads shared enable-rc5 --prefix=/usr/local/64
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Alvaro Cornejo"
To: "users"
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 5:18 AM
Subject:
hi all, i received some clarification back from the carrier: it was only
the first of a multipart message that got registered_delivery = 1, then
any subsequent parts of the multipart message had registered_delivery = 0.
this seems pretty sensible seeing as, from my perspective, a concatenated
m
registered_delivery gets set to nonzero when dlr-mask and dlr-url are
present.
Assuming that you're in fact setting those parameters, I see your point. I'm
not sure what the regular behaviour should be, when a message is being split
by kannel?
Let's analyze the facts further:
I assume the behavio
Yes,
That is correct behaviour and is SMSc depended.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Iain Dooley"
To:
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 8:28 AM
Subject: registered_delivery - clarification
hi all, i received some clarification back from the carrier: it was only
the first of a mult
Hi All,
I have a strange situation.
I set up kannel. It was a functional setup but it was on a computer whose IP
didn't have access to my SMSC's port.
Later I made the "real" setup on another computer and more or less abandoned
the other.
Bearerbox remained set to start at boot on the origin
Hi,
I don't think it makes much sense to have individual verification for each
part. The SMSc should respond with OK if message succesfully assembled and
delivered as a whole; else if any part fails, failure. After all, if any part
fails, correct behaviour would be to resend the whole SMS.
Add
Hi Alejandro,
present.
Assuming that you're in fact setting those parameters, I see your point. I'm
not sure what the regular behaviour should be, when a message is being split
by kannel?
Let's analyze the facts further:
I assume the behaviour now is only to set registered_delivery = 1 on the
I should add to my last email that I think that all messages (even single
part messages) should have entries in both message and message_part; ie.
the system treats a single part message as a special kind of multipart
message rather than the other way around.
cheers
iain
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009,
Hi,
The only thing that I can think of, is that an *smsbox* (or SQLbox) got active
somehow. I mean, you were sure that no network access was to the SMSc, and yet
there was. How difficult would be to start smsbox? Propably someone needed to
use it and enabled the network and smsbox.
The only co
24 matches
Mail list logo
