anas
Cc: Latitude Test ; users
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: getting delivery report: delivery failure
not relevant !== optional. Where did you read "optional" or "can be removed"?
Again, this is NOT a standard, and it's documented by example, wh
t: . . . . . . . . .”*
> > > > >
> > > > > Kannel expects that format, a missing field will definitely confuse
> > > > sscanf.
> > > >
> > > > If the kannel relies on not standardized format then that _is_ the bug
> > > > in kann
fuse
> > > sscanf.
> > >
> > > If the kannel relies on not standardized format then that _is_ the bug
> > > in kannel.
> > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Alejandro
> > > >
> > > > 2009/10/19 N
;
> Let's stop the spam, until it's needed.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Alejandro Guerrieri <mailto:alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com>
> *To:* Latitude Test <mailto:latit
> > is
> > > > using *optional fields* like "sub" and "dlvrd". If thats true, then
> > isn't
> > > > is a bug?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Quoting Nokos
> > > >
> > > >
> &g
>
> Let's stop the spam, until it's needed.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Alejandro Guerrieri
> *To:* Latitude Test
> *Cc:* Nikos Balkanas ; users
> *Sent:* Monday, October 19, 2009 5:50 PM
> *Subject:* Re: getting de
s needed.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Alejandro Guerrieri
To: Latitude Test
Cc: Nikos Balkanas ; users
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: getting delivery report: delivery failure
Sorry, what optional fields are you talking about? sub: and dlvrd:
; > Hi,
> > >
> > > You seem to have the spec. Just read which fields are mandatory from
> there.
> > > Kannel requires mandatory fields. Kannel will use optional fields, if
> they
> > > exist, but it doesn't reuire them. Optional fields are: sub, dlvrd &
&
reuire them. Optional fields are: sub, dlvrd &
>> err. Read the spec.
>>
>> Nikos
>>
>> - Original Message -----
>> *From:* Latitude Test
>> *To:* users ; Nikos Balkanas
>> *Sent:* Monday, October 19, 2009 4:59 PM
>> *Subject:* Fwd: ge
uire them. Optional fields are: sub, dlvrd & err.
> > Read the spec.
> >
> > Nikos
> >
> > - Original Message -----
> > *From:* Latitude Test
> > *To:* users ; Nikos Balkanas
> > *Sent:* Monday, October 19, 2009 4:59 PM
> > *Subject:*
tional fields, if they
> exist, but it doesn't reuire them. Optional fields are: sub, dlvrd & err.
> Read the spec.
>
> Nikos
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Latitude Test
> *To:* users ; Nikos Balkanas
> *Sent:* Monday, October 19, 2009 4:59 PM
> *
Nikos Balkanas
> *Sent:* Monday, October 19, 2009 4:59 PM
> *Subject:* Fwd: getting delivery report: delivery failure
>
> I will contact my SMSC but I need to know exactly which fields are really
> being used by Kannel to return the DLR status?. Seems to me that Kannel is
> usin
-
From: Latitude Test
To: users ; Nikos Balkanas
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 4:59 PM
Subject: Fwd: getting delivery report: delivery failure
I will contact my SMSC but I need to know exactly which fields are really
being used by Kannel to return the DLR status?. Seems to me that
are missing, but also a required
> field: "Text". Without it kannel cannot understand the DLR.
>
> Contact your SMSc about it. They should comply to the SMPP spec.
>
>
>
> BR,
>
> Nikos
>
-- Forwarded message ------
From: Latitude Test
Date: Mon,
gt; *Sent:* Monday, October 19, 2009 2:49 PM
> *Subject:* Fwd: getting delivery report: delivery failure
>
> Adding to it, I saw Kannel sending me correct DLRs with another SMSC and in
> the logs I saw the following:
>
> dlvrd:001
> sub:001
> Text:.
>
> The mendator
Yes, but it is required to be there. I am not making the spec.
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Latitude Test
To: users ; Nikos Balkanas
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 2:49 PM
Subject: Fwd: getting delivery report: delivery failure
Adding to it, I saw Kannel sending me
but it is
worth a try.
Let me know how it works. I can not test it.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Latitude Test
To: users ; Nikos Balkanas
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: getting delivery report: delivery failure
Thanks Nikos. But I do get &q
ge then? Seems it uses the optional
>>> fields which are "sub" and "dlvrd".
>>>
>>> Please confirm.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> -- Forwarded message --
>>> From: Latitude Test
>>> Date: Mo
vrd".
>>
>> Please confirm.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> ------ Forwarded message --
>> From: Latitude Test
>> Date: Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:31 PM
>> Subject: Re: getting delivery report: delivery failure
>> To: users , Nikos Balkanas
t;
> Please confirm.
>
> Thanks.
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Latitude Test
> Date: Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:31 PM
> Subject: Re: getting delivery report: delivery failure
> To: users , Nikos Balkanas
>
>
>
> Thanks Nikos. But I do get "stat&
t;sub" and "dlvrd".
Please confirm.
Thanks.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Latitude Test
Date: Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: getting delivery report: delivery failure
To: users , Nikos Balkanas
Thanks Nikos. But I do get "stat" field which con
>
> BR,
>
> Nikos
>
> - Original Message -
>
> *From:* Latitude Test
> *To:* users ; Nikos Balkanas
> *Sent:* Monday, October 19, 2009 12:26 PM
> *Subject:* Re: getting delivery report: delivery failure
>
> Apologies for not sending the complete PDU
m: Latitude Test
To: users
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 11:21 AM
Subject: getting delivery report: delivery failure
This is what I see in the log:
DEBUG: data: 69 64 3a 32 34 35 31 37 33 33 31 33 34 20 73 75
id:2451733134 su
DEBUG: data: 62 6d 69 74 20 64
whole PDU entry from bb logs.
>
> Nikos
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Latitude Test
> *To:* users
> *Sent:* Friday, October 16, 2009 11:21 AM
> *Subject:* getting delivery report: delivery failure
>
>
>
>
> This is what I see in the log:
>
> DEB
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Latitude Test
To: users
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 11:21 AM
Subject: getting delivery report: delivery failure
This is what I see in the log:
DEBUG: data: 69 64 3a 32 34 35 31 37 33 33 31 33 34 20 73 75 id:2451733134 su
DEBUG: data
I
> suspect that your SMSc is sending the wrong DKR.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Latitude Test
> *To:* users
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 13, 2009 2:15 PM
> *Subject:* getting delivery report: delivery failure
>
> Hi all,
>
> M
c. I
> suspect that your SMSc is sending the wrong DKR.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Latitude Test
> *To:* users
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 13, 2009 2:15 PM
> *Subject:* getting delivery report: delivery failure
>
> Hi all,
>
>
Hi,
Please post detailed bb logs with the respond_sm PDU from your SMSc. I suspect
that your SMSc is sending the wrong DKR.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Latitude Test
To: users
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 2:15 PM
Subject: getting delivery report: delivery
Hi all,
My kannel is configured to send me delivery reports for the SMS messages:
?dlrStatus=%d&dlrData=%A&dlr-mask=7
>From Kannel docs:
1: delivery success
2: delivery failure
4: message buffered
8: smsc submit
16: smsc reject
I was getting the correct response co
29 matches
Mail list logo
