this thread terminates.
>
> BR,
> Nikos - (not Nikkos)
> - Original Message -
> From: "dafodil"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 8:38 AM
> Subject: Re: kannel performance
>
>
>>
>> Hi
>> Nikkos,
>>
>> no my appl
f in doubt
check max detail smsbox logs.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "dafodil"
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
Hi
yes u r right is sb log.
i wonder when i sent once why does it goes 2 times.does any wrong
configuration causes
il smsbox logs.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message -
> From: "dafodil"
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 3:52 PM
> Subject: Re: kannel performance
>
>
>>
>> Hi
>> yes u r right is sb log.
>> i wonder when i sent
Nothing wrong with kannel. Your application sends them twice. If in doubt
check max detail smsbox logs.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "dafodil"
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
Hi
yes u r right is sb log.
i wonder when i
og. It doesn't prove
> anyting,
> except that you have sent twice the same SMS.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message -
> From: "dafodil"
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 10:17 AM
> Subject: Re: kannel performance
>
>
>>
This is not bb access log, but smsbox access log. It doesn't prove anyting,
except that you have sent twice the same SMS.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "dafodil"
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
Hi Nikkos,
Than
K indefinitely,
> it
> shouldn't resend the same sms again.
>
> I am assuming you are using the SMPP smsc. Try on sending a few SMS (~5),
> comment out log-file in smsc group and turn bb logs to maximum detail.
> Watch
> for anything unusual, especially ACKs. Post relevant
evant portions if you get any
problems.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "dafodil"
To:
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
Hi nikkos,
just to add more operator says that kannel is senindg submit_sm for same
number multiple times.
essages?
> Try changing store-type to spool.
> Describe test conditions. Were all of your smsc active during tests?
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message -
> From: "Willy Mularto"
> To: "dafodil"
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:5
to spool.
> Describe test conditions. Were all of your smsc active during tests?
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message -
> From: "Willy Mularto"
> To: "dafodil"
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:55 PM
> Subject: Re: kannel performance
itions. Were all of your smsc active during tests?
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message -
> From: "Willy Mularto"
> To: "dafodil"
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:55 PM
> Subject: Re: kannel performance
>
>
>
arto"
To: "dafodil"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
It would be helpful if you provide us your detailed log. Please set
log-level to 0.
sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/
On Oct 8, 2010, at 6:54
It would be helpful if you provide us your detailed log. Please set log-level
to 0.
sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/
On Oct 8, 2010, at 6:54 PM, dafodil wrote:
>
> Hi List,
> Good Day.
> While stress testing with kannel i found the follwing.i was trying to
Hi to add more i m using svn-r4845.
Br
daf
dafodil wrote:
>
> Hi List,
> Good Day.
> While stress testing with kannel i found the follwing.i was trying to send
> 10 k sms through HTTP/sendsms.
> storage internal queued grows to 230.
> kannel.store size keeps growing and now it seems to be 4
: Alejandro Guerrieri
Cc: Rene Kluwen; brett skinner; Users
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Currently I apply bearerbox-sqlbox-smsbox and use mysql as my dlr engine. On
Delll R710 Quadcore 2.2 Intel Xeon 16GB RAM it usually reduce to 5GB available
memory in just 6 days and must be
: Tuesday, 10 August, 2010 11:56
To: Alejandro Guerrieri
Cc: Users
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Thanks for your feedback.
Guess it is the age old tao of computer science. Space vs Time, always space vs
time. :)
Regards,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri
ne
>>
>> From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
>> Of brett skinner
>>
>> Sent: Tuesday, 10 August, 2010 11:56
>> To: Alejandro Guerrieri
>> Cc: Users
>> Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
>>
&
e which one works faster for you.
>
> == Rene
>
> *From:* users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] *On
> Behalf Of *brett skinner
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 10 August, 2010 11:56
> *To:* Alejandro Guerrieri
> *Cc:* Users
> *Subject:* Re: Kannel performance benchm
Tuesday, 10 August, 2010 11:56
> To: Alejandro Guerrieri
> Cc: Users
> Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> Guess it is the age old tao of computer science. Space vs Time, always space
> vs time. :)
>
> Regards,
&
: Alejandro Guerrieri
Cc: Users
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Thanks for your feedback.
Guess it is the age old tao of computer science. Space vs Time, always space vs
time. :)
Regards,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri
wrote:
Oh yes, I read that blog
-SMS
>>>> batch. Count was sufficient to reach sustainability and reproducibility,
>>>> yet
>>>> short enough to get results fast.
>>>>
>>>> When i submitted fakesmpp, I also released similar data from a 64bit
>>>> Solaris 10 server.
&
.)
>>>
>>> The figures I gave were sustained rates simulated with a 1-SMS batch.
>>> Count was sufficient to reach sustainability and reproducibility, yet short
>>> enough to get results fast.
>>>
>>> When i submitted fakesmpp, I also released sim
ail.com
> To: brett skinner ; users-boun...@kannel.org ; us...@kannel. Users@Kannel.Org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 11:21 AM
>
> Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
>
>
> Brett,
>
> The DLR engine uses SELECT COUNT(*) from the admin interface, whic
ver.
>>
>> BR,
>> Nikos
>> - Original Message - From: alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com
>> To: brett skinner ; users-boun...@kannel.org ; us...@kannel.users@Kannel.Org
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 11:21 AM
>>
>> Subject: Re: Kannel per
:21 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Brett,
The DLR engine uses SELECT COUNT(*) from the admin interface, which is
painfully slow on InnoDB for moderately big tables.
While InnoDB would theoretically be the best option, MyIsam performs quite
better in this case.
Regards,
Alex
oficin@
-Original Message-
From: brett skinner
Sender: users-boun...@kannel.org
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:13:54
To: Users
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Hi Nikos
Thanks for the extra information. What was the motivation for using MyISAM?
My reading lead me to believe that
uot;Nikos Balkanas"
> Cc: "brett skinner" ; "kannel users" <
> users@kannel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 3:35 AM
>
> Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
>
>
> Yeah I understand that. But when the there is no traffic. Kannel do
nominal levels once the traffic is gone.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message - From: sangprabv
> To: brett skinner
> Cc: Nikos Balkanas ; kannel users
> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
>
>
> Hi Nikos,
Try valgrind in linux.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "sangprabv"
To: "Nikos Balkanas"
Cc: "brett skinner" ; "kannel users"
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 3:35 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Yeah I understand that.
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Hi Nikos,
Do you experience memory problem? In my case Kannel is eating the memory on
high load traffics. I always need to restart the box to get more memory. I
even give 3 on /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches but still
- Original Message -
From: brett skinner
To: Nikos Balkanas
Cc: ha...@aeon.pk ; kannel users
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Hi Nikos
Out of curiosity can you go into more detail regarding what hardware you
were running and your setup
Hi Nikos,
Do you experience memory problem? In my case Kannel is eating the memory on
high load traffics. I always need to restart the box to get more memory. I even
give 3 on /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches but still Kannel eat the memory :(
sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
http://www.petitiononline.co
Hi Nikos
Out of curiosity can you go into more detail regarding what hardware you
were running and your setup for MySql? Were you using Innodb or MyIsam. If
you were using Innodb did you make any other configuration changes to MySql
to accommodate Innodb.
>From the user guide it is implied that t
Hi,
I have run some benchmarking for a client using fakesmpp. Using the default
service for MO's I got:
MO's: 1400 SMS/s
MT + DLRs (internal): 747 SMS/s
MT + DLRs (MySql): 434 SMS/s
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: ha...@aeon.pk
To: kannel users
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 4:2
How can I check Kannel performance using fakesms script?
Thanks,
- Ambrish
Has anyone attempted to use with litespeedtech.com instead of apache
to boost incoming http posts?
We're also noticing very slow http posts to our apache from our API
users and seeking ways to get performance increase.
Would it help maybe to have a proxy or use some other tools anyone
that can su
Hi
After adding eaccelerator to my server, i got speed boost about 2-3
times, now its about 1500 SMS/minute.
Checking /server-status under heavy load i see that apache has about
10-15 requests in process and
13-16 free idle workers all the time.
Kannel keep-alive has been switched off by me
Hi
After adding eaccelerator to my server, i got speed boost about 2-3
times, now its about 1500 SMS/minute.
Checking /server-status under heavy load i see that apache has about
10-15 requests in process and
13-16 free idle workers all the time.
Kannel keep-alive has been switched off by me
Can you share your conf files for kannel and apache so we can help you test?
/Garth
On Feb 13, 2008 3:32 PM, Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Bochkaryov schrieb:
> > Hi!
> >
> > First try to test only apache performance without kannel.
> > At least you'll be sure if it's apache+php
Michael Bochkaryov schrieb:
Hi!
First try to test only apache performance without kannel.
At least you'll be sure if it's apache+php problem or something else.
Some ideas (mostly about apache and php tuning):
1. Use eaccelerator to increase performance of PHP scripts.
2. Try to use some lightwe
Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com schrieb:
Hi
Im testing Kannel performance using fakesmsc.
I have set-up three fake connections and im sending 20 000 SMS per
connection
and kannel receives them in speed 2000 SMS/sec per connection and stores
the
messages in Kannel buffer.
Now i have Apache2
Hello,
Could you be more precise on the test environnement? Are you using mysql in
both? It could depend as well how you are coding your database request. If
you are asking for all the fields of each record or not Many things to
explain before we could advice if the issue is from kannel or not
Hi!
First try to test only apache performance without kannel.
At least you'll be sure if it's apache+php problem or something else.
Some ideas (mostly about apache and php tuning):
1. Use eaccelerator to increase performance of PHP scripts.
2. Try to use some lightweight HTTP daemon (lighttpd or
43 matches
Mail list logo
