As per your mail,
SMPP client -> smppserver -> Bearerbox -> SMSC 1 / SMSC2
Now if SMSC2 gives NACK, you want message should be route through SMSC1.
If that's the case, As sugested above you have to do customization.
if any other scenario, brief it.
Regards
Jyoti Ranjan Panda
On Mon, Jun 30,
Dear Sir,
You are absolutely correct, but the logic is implemented in smppbox
for providing multiple smsc and also
bearerbox setting is not to be changed.
My application communicates with smppbox and smppbox in turn
communicates with bearerbox.
Regards,
Ramesh Helai
2014-06-30 10:53 GMT+04:00 Ramesh G. Helaiya :
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> The option which u have provided is a not what I am looking for.
> Let me give an example of the same with format of access, below is
> what the process flow must be
>
> 2014-06-30 12:12:48 FAILED Send SMS [SMSC:smpp_
Dear Sir,
The option which u have provided is a not what I am looking for.
Let me give an example of the same with format of access, below is
what the process flow must be
2014-06-30 12:12:48 FAILED Send SMS [SMSC:smpp_g1] [SVC:x]
[ACT:smpp] [BINF:] [from:tester] [to:
2014-06-28 2:44 GMT+04:00 Ramesh G. Helaiya :
> Dear Team,
>
> How can we implement Fall Back SMSC Option in bearerbox.
> When one SMSC is rejecting the Message with NACK, the message must be
> retried with other SMSC.
>
There is no such option here.
You can implement yourself a simp
Dear sir,
Thanks for the option, but allowed and denied smsc option serves
different purpose altogether.
My concern is to by pass the message from second smsc if the first
smsc provides NACK (Negative ACK).
I do not want the message to be dropped or get rejected due to SMSC
Re
Hi
Use allow-smsc/denied-smsc; this way kannel will balance sms between
smsc´s with the same allowed-smsc´s
Regards
Alvaro
|-|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y de
