Cc: "ismail berrada" ; "users@kannel.org"
Subject: Re: Delete message from queue
Than i think someone from DEV team should be able to reply on this.
Already received MO from memory will be cleared on what basis should be
answered by DEV team.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:2
t to delete this MO without restarting kannel (production case)"
>
> ::Lamnt.
>
> --
> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:16:24 +0530
> Subject: Re: Delete message from queue
> From: tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com
> To: lam...@outlook.com
> CC: ismaberr.
No Tapan, the original question from Berrada is:
"I want to delete this MO without restarting kannel (production case)"
::Lamnt.
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:16:24 +0530
Subject: Re: Delete message from queue
From: tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com
To: lam...@outlook.com
CC: ismaberr...@yahoo
essage that bearerbox received from
> upstream SMSC. I've not tested for MT sent out message yet.
>
> ::Lamnt
>
> --
> From: tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:03:10 -0800
> Subject: RE: Delete message from queue
> To: lam
e for queued messages. Ah
sorry that i'm talking about the MO message that bearerbox received from
upstream SMSC. I've not tested for MT sent out message yet.
::Lamnt
From: tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:03:10 -0800
Subject: RE: Delete message from queue
To: lam
Have u given HUP singnal to bearerbox process Id after moving spool files?
Sent from my Windows Phone
--
From: Lam Nguyen Tuong
Sent: 14-11-2014 07:59
To: Tapan Kumar Thapa ; ismail berrada
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: RE: Delete message from queue
Unfortunately, it is not work, Tapan.
Event spool files has been deleted, bearerbox still keep the queue in mem until
it be restarted.
Any idea?
Thanks.
::Lamnt.
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:07:10 +0530
Subject: Re: Delete message from queue
From: tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com
To: ismaberr...@yahoo.fr
You can delete the file however you also need to send a HUP signal to
bearerbox.
ps -wef |grep bearerbox|grep -v grep // Check its process id
than
kill -HUP
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 7:26 PM, ismail berrada
wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have a MO that is not well formed and it is not sent to the ESME
> I