Hi,
Sometimes aggregators offer both. You just have to ask.
You are correct HTTP smsc will only use GET.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Antti Karvonen"
To: "Malthe Borch"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2010 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: HTTP smsc and POST-metho
Thank you Malthe,
I can't change the SMS aggregator's server settings, so if they don't
use HTTPS then also the smsc-module of Kannel must also use HTTP.
I couldn't find post-url or get-url for smsc-group, only send-url.
Maybe I didn't explain the requirement clear enough: I don't mean sms-
POST accepts more that GET. :D
--
Kenny
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Malthe Borch wrote:
> On 17 April 2010 00:38, Antti Karvonen wrote:
> > But I still wonder if there was some undocumented way to configure the
> HTTP
> > interface of Kannel so that it would communicate via POST inste
On 17 April 2010 00:38, Antti Karvonen wrote:
> But I still wonder if there was some undocumented way to configure the HTTP
> interface of Kannel so that it would communicate via POST instead of GET.
Use ``post-url`` instead of ``get-url``.
That said, what's driving you to require POST? There's
Hi, I had a case where SMSs aggregator would have wanted to use HTTP
interface, and the requests (MO/MT) would have been sent and received
using HTTP POST. It seems that Kannel communicates only using GET
method, at least when you have selected HTTP SMSC with system-type
"generic".
Search