Re: Facing issue while producing

Hi Vikram, please share some more details: 1. producer version 2. broker version 3. broker side config you mentioned is "snappy", can you check what is it on topic level as well 4. do you face this issue when you use any other algorithm instead of snappy, say lz4? Try with topic

Re: Facing issue while producing

Also what is the version of Java you are running? On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 11:44 AM Akash Jain wrote: > Hi Vikram, please share some more details: > >1. producer version >2. broker version >3. broker side config you mentioned is "snappy", can you check what is >it on topic level a

[DISCUSS] `unclean.leader.election.enable` in KRaft behavior change

Hi all, In v3.9.0, we're planning to support the `unclean.leader.election.enable` config in KRaft. Currently, the implementation PR is under review now. But I'd like to raise the discussion to let you know there will be one behavior change when enabling

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Lianet Magrans

Congrats! Very well deserved! On 8/28/24 9:18 AM, Justine Olshan wrote: Congratulations Lianet!! Justine On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 8:58 AM David Arthur wrote: Congrats, Lianet! On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 11:48 AM Mickael Maison wrote: Congratulations Lianet! On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 5:40 PM J

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Lianet Magrans

Congrats Lianet! On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 12:32 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > Congrats! Very well deserved! > > On 8/28/24 9:18 AM, Justine Olshan wrote: > > Congratulations Lianet!! > > Justine > > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 8:58 AM David Arthur wrote: > > > >> Congrats, Lianet! > >> > >> On Wed

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Lianet Magrans

Well deserved! Best, Bruno On 8/28/24 6:37 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote: Congrats Lianet! On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 12:32 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote: Congrats! Very well deserved! On 8/28/24 9:18 AM, Justine Olshan wrote: Congratulations Lianet!! Justine On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 8:58 AM David Arthur

Re: [DISCUSS] `unclean.leader.election.enable` in KRaft behavior change

Hi Luke, I assume that unclean leader election exists as a static config in kafka kraft, but is still unavailable dynamically? Or is it unavailable in general? Thanks! ttyl Dima On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 3:45 AM Luke Chen wrote: > Hi all, > > In v3.9.0, we're planning to support the `unclean.l

Re: [DISCUSS] `unclean.leader.election.enable` in KRaft behavior change

Hi Dima, > I assume that unclean leader election exists as a static config in kafka kraft, but is still unavailable dynamically? Or is it unavailable in general? Let me make it clear. In v3.9.0, the `unclean.leader.election.enable` in KRaft will work, either static config or dynamic config. It's

Re: [DISCUSS] `unclean.leader.election.enable` in KRaft behavior change

Thanks Luke, I meant in pre 3.9.x, like 3.6.x or 3.7.x branch for example. ttyl Dima On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 7:36 PM Luke Chen wrote: > Hi Dima, > > > I assume that unclean leader election exists as a static config in kafka > kraft, but is still unavailable dynamically? Or is it unavailable

Re: [DISCUSS] `unclean.leader.election.enable` in KRaft behavior change

Hi Dima, Before v3.9.0, brokers in KRaft mode didn't honor `unclean.leader.election.enable` config. So, the static config and dynamic config didn't work. The only thing works before v3.9.0 is using he admin API or cli to run `kafka-leader-election.sh` with `unclean` option. Thanks. Luke On Thu,

Re: [DISCUSS] `unclean.leader.election.enable` in KRaft behavior change

Thank you! This helps alot Sent from Mobile On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 19:48 Luke Chen wrote: > Hi Dima, > > Before v3.9.0, brokers in KRaft mode didn't honor > `unclean.leader.election.enable` config. > So, the static config and dynamic config didn't work. > The only thing works before v3.9.0 i