David - We're currently running 3.4.6 without issues, though our load is
modest.
Clark
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> Through our experience of operating zookeeper in production at LinkedIn, we
> found 3.3.4 to be very stable. It is likely at 3.4.x is stable now, but we
>
Through our experience of operating zookeeper in production at LinkedIn, we
found 3.3.4 to be very stable. It is likely at 3.4.x is stable now, but we
can't say for sure as we haven't had a chance to deploy 3.4.x in production
yet.
Thanks,
Neha
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:13 PM, David Peterson wr
Is there any compelling reason to use the latest stable ZooKeeper instead of
the 3.3.4 version included with the Kafka distribution?
We’re not using ZooKeeper for any other application - we’re only running it
because it’s a Kafka dependency.
Thank you,
-dave.
Thanks Jason.
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Jason Rosenberg wrote:
> Hi Pushkar,
>
> We've been using zk 3.4.5 for several months now, without any
> problems, in production.
>
> Jason
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:15 AM, pushkar priyadarshi
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am starting a fresh deplo
Hi Pushkar,
We've been using zk 3.4.5 for several months now, without any
problems, in production.
Jason
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:15 AM, pushkar priyadarshi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am starting a fresh deployment of kafka + zookeeper.Looking at zookeeper
> releases find 3.4.5 old and stable enough.Ha
Hi,
I am starting a fresh deployment of kafka + zookeeper.Looking at zookeeper
releases find 3.4.5 old and stable enough.Has anyone used this before in
production?
kafka ops wiki page says at Linkedin deployment still uses 3.3.4.Any
specific reason for the same.
Thanks And Regards,
Pushkar