Nice catch--fixed.
-Jay
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Markus Roder wrote:
> Hi together,
>
> I have recognized following issue:
>
> https://kafka.apache.org/introduction.html in the "Getting
> started"-section
> the link to the design-page is broken.
> currently the link point to https://kafk
Hi together,
I have recognized following issue:
https://kafka.apache.org/introduction.html in the "Getting started"-section
the link to the design-page is broken.
currently the link point to https://kafka.apache.org/08/design.html but
should be https://kafka.apache.org/design.html
regards
2013
1. I think it is fine to do a one-off since it won't impact the APIs. It
would be *awesome* to get this working.
2. Let's sync up since I think we may be both working on the same page.
-Jay
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Sriram Subramanian <
srsubraman...@linkedin.com> wrote:
> Also,
>
> 1. I
Also,
1. I am trying to get the api stuff working but it is little but of work.
I need to make Kafka compile with Scala 2.10 first.
2. I have started a design page for kafka replication. The idea is that it
goes as a separate section under the current design page. I will update
the page today and
Yeah thanks for the feedback, that's helpful. Here was my thinking:
1. I think it just makes sense to have one design and implementation page
which describe the most recent release and live at the top level. You could
imagine wanting to read older design pages but that seems a bit unlikely
mostly,
Thanks for cleaning up the site. Overall, it looks cleaner. A few comments:
1. implementation: This is mostly about the 0.7 implementation. So it
probably should be added under 0.7.
2. 0.8 quickstart: Step 3, when the text says list topic, the command is
actually create topic. Step 4, not sure if
Ack, nice catch--that migration tool thing was due to bad html, I
forgot to close the link.
For the configuration I actually think that is not right. We need to
thoroughly document our configuration. Having the code/scaladoc be the
documentation is fine for kafka developers but not where we want t
Looks good overall - thanks a lot for the improvements.
Couple of comments: clicking on the 0.7 link goes to the migration
page (which should probably be on the 0.8 link)
Also, for the configuration.html file, I used to find the old scala
docs pointing to the actual *Config classes more current an
On 6/28/13 2:48 PM, "Sriram Subramanian"
wrote:
>1. I have moved the FAQ to a wiki. I have separated the sections into
>producer, consumers and broker related questions. I would still need to
>add replication FAQ. The main FAQ will now link to this. Let me know if
>you guys have better ways of
1. I have moved the FAQ to a wiki. I have separated the sections into
producer, consumers and broker related questions. I would still need to
add replication FAQ. The main FAQ will now link to this. Let me know if
you guys have better ways of representing the FAQ.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluen
Looks much better.
1. We need to update FAQ for 0.8
2. We should probably have a separate section for implementation.
3. The migration tool explanation seems to be hard to get to.
On 6/27/13 5:40 PM, "Jay Kreps" wrote:
>Hey Folks,
>
>I did a pass on the website. Changes:
>1. Rewrote the 0.8 q
Hey Folks,
I did a pass on the website. Changes:
1. Rewrote the 0.8 quickstart and included a section on running in
distributed mode.
2. Fixed up the styles a bit.
3. Fixed the bizarre menu thing with 0.7 and 0.8 specific docs.
4. Re-wrote the copy on the front page.
I would love to get any feedb
12 matches
Mail list logo
