Re: Kafka 2.8.0 "KRaft" - advertised.listeners port mismatch?

2021-08-12 Thread Mike Pontillo
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 11:44 AM c...@uweeisele.eu wrote: > this is a bug which I also have already noticed. This has already been > fixed (https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10935) and it will be > released with Kafka 3.0.0 ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13003). Thank you fo

AW: Kafka 2.8.0 "KRaft" - advertised.listeners port mismatch?

2021-08-12 Thread c...@uweeisele.eu
on GitHub. github.com I hope this helps. Best Regards, Uwe Von: Mike Pontillo Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. August 2021 03:53 An: users@kafka.apache.org Betreff: Kafka 2.8.0 "KRaft" - advertised.listeners port mismatch? Greetings, I'm trying to c

Kafka 2.8.0 "KRaft" - advertised.listeners port mismatch?

2021-08-11 Thread Mike Pontillo
rs=CONTROLLER://127.0.0.1:9093,INTERNAL://127.0.0.1:9094,EXTERNAL:// 0.0.0.0:9092 inter.broker.listener.name=INTERNAL advertised.listeners=INTERNAL://127.0.0.1:9094,EXTERNAL://127.0.0.1:55032 controller.listener.names=CONTROLLER listener.security.protocol.map=CONTROLLER:PLAINTEXT,INTERNAL:PLAINTEXT,EX

Re: Advertised.listeners to be used behind VIP Load Balancer

2021-07-04 Thread Shilin Wu
t; On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 12:04 AM sunil chaudhari wrote: > Honestly I didnt get this question. > Please elaborate. > > > On Sun, 4 Jul 2021 at 5:34 PM, M. Manna wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Is it currently possible to use a single endpoint for > advertised.list

Re: Advertised.listeners to be used behind VIP Load Balancer

2021-07-04 Thread sunil chaudhari
Honestly I didnt get this question. Please elaborate. On Sun, 4 Jul 2021 at 5:34 PM, M. Manna wrote: > Hello, > > Is it currently possible to use a single endpoint for advertised.listeners, > which is in front of all my brokers? the flow for example > > broker1--

Advertised.listeners to be used behind VIP Load Balancer

2021-07-04 Thread M. Manna
Hello, Is it currently possible to use a single endpoint for advertised.listeners, which is in front of all my brokers? the flow for example broker1-->| V broker2-->| I broker3-->| P I was under the impression that I can reach any broker I wanted (assuming that

Re: advertised.listeners

2018-04-04 Thread Darshan
>> (org.apache.kafka.clients.NetworkClient)* >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *server.properties for our Kafka-1,2,3. They are identical >> except broker.id <http://broker.id/> and super.users properties.# ID and >> basic topic creationbroke

Re: advertised.listeners

2018-04-04 Thread Manikumar
t; > > > > > > > *server.properties for our Kafka-1,2,3. They are identical > except broker.id <http://broker.id/> and super.users properties.# ID and > basic topic creationbroker.id > <http://broker.id/>=1auto.create.topics.enable=truedelete.topic.enable=tru

Re: advertised.listeners

2018-04-04 Thread Darshan
190.176:9093 <http://172.21.190.176:9093/>advertised.listeners=INTERNAL://1.1.1.165:9092 <http://1.1.1.165:9092/>,EXTERNAL://172.21.190.176:9093 <http://172.21.190.176:9093/>listener.security.protocol.map=INTERNAL:PLAINTEXT,EXTERNAL:SSLinter.broker.listener.name <http://inter.b

Re: advertised.listeners

2018-04-04 Thread Martin Gainty
From: Joe Hammerman Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 10:40 PM To: users@kafka.apache.org Subject: Re: advertised.listeners Hi all, Is it possible to run mixed mode with PLAINTEXT and SSL with no SASL? MG>setup SSL on kafka https://github.com/edenhill/librdka

Re: advertised.listeners

2018-04-03 Thread Manikumar
;yes"))) { > > LOG.warn("Maintaining client connection despite SASL authentication > > failure."); > > } else { > > LOG.warn("Closing client connection due to SASL authentication > > failure."); > > cnxn.close(); >

Re: advertised.listeners

2018-04-03 Thread Joe Hammerman
} else { > LOG.warn("Closing client connection due to SASL authentication > failure."); > cnxn.close(); >.. > } > > > does this conform to your findings? > > M > __ > > > >

Re: advertised.listeners

2018-04-03 Thread Martin Gainty
t;); } else { LOG.warn("Closing client connection due to SASL authentication failure."); cnxn.close(); .. } does this conform to your findings? M __ From: Darshan Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 6

Re: advertised.listeners

2018-04-03 Thread Darshan
> Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 5:45 PM > To: rajinisiva...@gmail.com > Cc: users@kafka.apache.org > Subject: Re: advertised.listeners > > Hi Rajini > > The above configuration that you mentioned a while back helped me sort the > issue of listeners and I was also able t

Re: advertised.listeners

2018-04-03 Thread Martin Gainty
__ From: Darshan Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 5:45 PM To: rajinisiva...@gmail.com Cc: users@kafka.apache.org Subject: Re: advertised.listeners Hi Rajini The above configuration that you mentioned a while back helped me sort the issue of listeners and I

Re: advertised.listeners

2018-04-03 Thread Darshan
erties.* # ID and basic topic creation broker.id=1 auto.create.topics.enable=true delete.topic.enable=true # LISTERN Settings listeners=INTERNAL://1.1.1.165:9092,EXTERNAL://172.21.190.176:9093 advertised.listeners=INTERNAL://1.1.1.165:9092,EXTERNAL:// 172.21.190.176:9093 listener.security.protoc

Re: advertised.listeners

2017-05-31 Thread Darshan
rties for internal/external if you need. > > listeners=INTERNAL://1.x.x.x:9092,EXTERNAL://172.x.x.x:9093 > > advertised.listeners=INTERNAL://1.x.x.x:9092,EXTERNAL://172.x.x.x:9093 > > listener.security.protocol.map=INTERNAL:SSL,EXTERNAL:SSL > > inter.broker.listener.name=INTERNAL

Re: advertised.listeners

2017-05-31 Thread Rajini Sivaram
If you want to use different interfaces with the same security protocol, you can specify listener names. You can then also configure different security properties for internal/external if you need. listeners=INTERNAL://1.x.x.x:9092,EXTERNAL://172.x.x.x:9093 advertised.listeners=INTERNAL://1

Re: advertised.listeners

2017-05-31 Thread Raghav
t; eth0 has 172.x.x.x for external leg > eth1 has 1.x.x.x for internal leg > > > Kafka Producer is on 172.x.x.x subnet, and Kafka Consumer is on 1.x.x.x > subnet. > > If we use advertised.listeners=SSL://172.x.x.x:9093, then Producer can > producer the message, but Consum

advertised.listeners

2017-05-31 Thread Darshan
Hi Our Kafka broker has two IPs on two different interfaces. eth0 has 172.x.x.x for external leg eth1 has 1.x.x.x for internal leg Kafka Producer is on 172.x.x.x subnet, and Kafka Consumer is on 1.x.x.x subnet. If we use advertised.listeners=SSL://172.x.x.x:9093, then Producer can producer

Re: question about property advertised.listeners

2016-12-23 Thread Aki Yoshida
Hi Kaufman, I wasn't thinking of using listeners to switch the running port itself. That makes it very simple. It was stupid of me. thank you. regards, aki 2016-11-30 17:43 GMT+01:00 Kaufman Ng : > The advertised.listeners property would not help you to map a different > port. If

Re: question about property advertised.listeners

2016-11-30 Thread Kaufman Ng
The advertised.listeners property would not help you to map a different port. If you need to talk to brokers at a different port you should also set the listeners property accordingly. Say if you want the broker to listen at port 10092 as an example, the server.properties needs to contain these

question about property advertised.listeners

2016-11-29 Thread Aki Yoshida
I have a question regarding how to use advertised.listeners to expose a different port to the outside of the container where the broker is running. When using advertised.listeners to register a different port as the actual broker port, do we need a port forwarding from this configured port to the