Hi Grant,
Thanks for the reply. Yes I meant data is received on the other end in
1sec while using asynchronous producer. We are using the new producer
and absolute ordering is our prime concern too.
Thanks,
Santhakumari
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Grant Henke wrote:
> The bottom line is sy
The bottom line is synchronous will never be as fast as asynchronous. When
using asynchronous mode you get the benefits of batching, compression,
reduced network roundtrips, etc. You do loose the ability to achieve
absolute ordering, but do you really need that? Can you design you system
not to?
W
Hi all,
We tested both Asynchronous and Synchronous producers by producing 10k messages.
Asynchronous producer took 1 sec to produce whereas synchronous took 50 secs.
Reliability is our primary concern hence we have planned to use
synchronous producer.
Please can any one of you suggest a way to
