Thanks!
On 11/15/17 7:57 AM, Matt Farmer wrote:
> Yes, in memory stores are backed by a changelog topic as far as I'm aware.
> I have filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6214
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:53 PM Matthias J. Sax
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for reporting.
>>
>> Sounds like
Yes, in memory stores are backed by a changelog topic as far as I'm aware.
I have filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6214
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:53 PM Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> Thanks for reporting.
>
> Sounds like a bug to me. Please file a Jira.
>
> Question: even if you use
Thanks for reporting.
Sounds like a bug to me. Please file a Jira.
Question: even if you use an In-Memory store, it's still backed by a
changelog topic, right?
-Matthias
On 11/14/17 3:07 PM, Matt Farmer wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> We ran across a little bit of a landmine in Kafka Streams 0.11.
Hey everyone,
We ran across a little bit of a landmine in Kafka Streams 0.11.0.1.
We decided to flip num.standby.replicas to 1 so that we had a hot copy of
our state stores on other hosts to facilitate fast failover. However, one
of the applications we tried this on currently uses an in memory st
