We plan to have a working prototype ready end of September.
Guozhang
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Jason Rosenberg wrote:
> Great, that's reassuring!
>
> What's the time frame for having a more or less stable version to try out?
>
> Jason
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Guozhang Wang
Great, that's reassuring!
What's the time frame for having a more or less stable version to try out?
Jason
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> I see your point now. The old consumer does have a hard-coded
> "round-robin-per-topic" logic which have this issue. In the new co
I see your point now. The old consumer does have a hard-coded
"round-robin-per-topic" logic which have this issue. In the new consumer,
we will make the assignment logic customizable so that people can specify
different rebalance algorithms they like.
Also I will soon send out a new consumer desig
Guozhang,
I'm not suggesting we parallelize within a partition
The problem with the current high-level consumer is, if you use a regex to
select multiple topics, and then have multiple consumers in the same group,
usually the first consumer will 'own' all the topics, and no amount of
sub-sequ
Hi Jason,
In the new design the consumption is still at the per-partition
granularity. The main rationale of doing this is ordering: Within a
partition we want to preserve the ordering such that message B produced
after message A will also be consumed and processed after message A. And
producers c
