Hi,
Is there any progress on this doc bug?
This discourages us from using the new producer.
Thanks
On 2015/07/18 5:23, Sivananda Reddy wrote:
Hi Jay,
I found it here:
http://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html#newproducerconfigs, the same
link is reported by James.
@Joel: Thanks a lot for t
Hi James,
Thanks for the info. For my use case I have a custom partition key
assignment to the producers.
Regards,
Siva.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:36 PM, James Cheng wrote:
> Be aware that the old producer and new producer have different
> partitioning algorithms:
>
> http://mail-archives.apac
Be aware that the old producer and new producer have different partitioning
algorithms:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-users/201504.mbox/%3C4A6E5F2C-232E-4288-8F9F-3F9D9AE05718%40tivo.com%3E
This could bite you if you rely on key-based partitioning and are switching
from the old
Hi Jay,
I found it here:
http://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html#newproducerconfigs, the same
link is reported by James.
@Joel: Thanks a lot for the info, I will use new producer
Regards,
Siva.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:02 PM, James Cheng wrote:
> http://kafka.apache.org/documentation.htm
http://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html, Section 3.4.
> 3.4 New Producer Configs
>
> We are working on a replacement for our existing producer. The code is
> available in trunk now and can be considered beta quality. Below is the
> configuration for the new producer.
Sivananda might have se
It is pretty safe :) and adopting it now will save you the trouble
of migrating later.
At LinkedIn, we are using the new producer for all the producers that
the Kafka team directly own - this means mirror-maker pipelines, REST
proxies and some auditing tools. We have not yet migrated other
produce
Hey Sivananda,
That's actually no longer true and likely a documentation bug. Where did
you see that?
-Jay
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Sivananda Reddy
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kafka document ion says that the new producer is in Beta state, how safe is
> it to use the new producer in production?.