Thanks a lot!
-Matthias
On 5/21/23 7:27 PM, Luke Chen wrote:
Hi Matthias,
Yes, I agree we should get this hotfix into 3.4.1.
I've backported into the 3.4 branch.
I'll create a new RC for 3.4.1.
Thanks.
Luke
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 5:13 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote:
Hi Luke,
RC0 for 3.4.1 inc
Hi Matthias,
Yes, I agree we should get this hotfix into 3.4.1.
I've backported into the 3.4 branch.
I'll create a new RC for 3.4.1.
Thanks.
Luke
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 5:13 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> Hi Luke,
>
> RC0 for 3.4.1 includes a fix for
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA
Hi Luke,
RC0 for 3.4.1 includes a fix for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14862. We recently
discovered that tge fix itself introduces a regression. We have already
a PR to fix-forward the regression:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13734
I think we should get the open PR m
Hi Luke,
This gets a +1 from my end. I believe non-binding because if I understand
it correctly, binding votes for releases are only issued by PMCs (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Process#ReleaseProcess-Afterthevotepasses
).
I did the following validations:
- Verified s
Hi Luke,
I ran the tests from the source package you created and I didn't get any of
the test failures you had on your CI build. I got other flaky tests though,
that after being run in isolation ran successfully. I'll try to run
signature validation, and some further testing later today or later t
Hi Luke, thanks for running the release.
Looks like the Maven artifacts are not in staging:
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/kafka/kafka-clients/3.4.1/
Documentation still has 3.4.0, instead of 3.4.1 (not sure if this will
be aligned later):
https://kafka.apache.org
