; To: 'users@kafka.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: only-once consumer groups
>
> Right, Neha, consumer groups are from 7, while replicas are in 8. Does
this
> mean the simple consumer in 8 can recognize a leader change?
>
> Thanks,
> rob
>
> > -Original Mes
t; To: users@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: RE: only-once consumer groups
>
> Rob,
>
> A consumer rebalances whenever a consumer process dies or a new
> consumer process joins the group. The details of the algorithm can be
found
> here http://kafka.apache.org/07/design.html
>
> Thanks,
;
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Neha Narkhede [mailto:neha.narkh...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 7:32 AM
> > To: users@kafka.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: only-once consumer groups
> >
> > We spent some time thinking about consolidating
; From: Neha Narkhede [mailto:neha.narkh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 7:32 AM
> To: users@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: RE: only-once consumer groups
>
> We spent some time thinking about consolidating the high level and low
level
> consumer APIs. It will be great if y
users@kafka.apache.org
Subject: RE: only-once consumer groups
We spent some time thinking about consolidating the high level and low
level consumer APIs. It will be great if you can read the wiki and provide
feedback -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Consumer+Client+Re-Design
T
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Neha Narkhede [mailto:neha.narkh...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 10:03 PM
> > To: users@kafka.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: only-once consumer groups
> >
> > Can you describe your requirements in a l
rkh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 10:03 PM
> To: users@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: only-once consumer groups
>
> Can you describe your requirements in a little more detail?
>
> Thanks,
> Neha
> On May 16, 2013 6:11 AM, "Withers, Robert"
>
Can you describe your requirements in a little more detail?
Thanks,
Neha
On May 16, 2013 6:11 AM, "Withers, Robert" wrote:
> is it technically feasible to use an only-once simple consumer within a
> consumer group?
>
> thanks,
> rob